diff mbox series

[v5,bpf-next,8/9] selftests/bpf: A pro/epilogue test when the main prog jumps back to the 1st insn

Message ID 20240829210833.388152-9-martin.lau@linux.dev (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 42fdbbde6cf4159f77de13a40f8c0be6ef48bcc1
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Add gen_epilogue to bpf_verifier_ops | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/apply success Patch already applied to bpf-next-0

Commit Message

Martin KaFai Lau Aug. 29, 2024, 9:08 p.m. UTC
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

This patch adds a pro/epilogue test when the main prog has a goto insn
that goes back to the very first instruction of the prog. It is
to test the correctness of the adjust_jmp_off(prog, 0, delta)
after the verifier has applied the prologue and/or epilogue patch.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pro_epilogue.c   |   2 +
 .../bpf/progs/pro_epilogue_goto_start.c       | 149 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 151 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pro_epilogue_goto_start.c
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pro_epilogue.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pro_epilogue.c
index b82525c29de8..f974ae9ac610 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pro_epilogue.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pro_epilogue.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ 
 #include <test_progs.h>
 #include "pro_epilogue.skel.h"
 #include "epilogue_tailcall.skel.h"
+#include "pro_epilogue_goto_start.skel.h"
 
 struct st_ops_args {
 	__u64 a;
@@ -51,6 +52,7 @@  static void test_tailcall(void)
 void test_pro_epilogue(void)
 {
 	RUN_TESTS(pro_epilogue);
+	RUN_TESTS(pro_epilogue_goto_start);
 	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall"))
 		test_tailcall();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pro_epilogue_goto_start.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pro_epilogue_goto_start.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3529e53be355
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pro_epilogue_goto_start.c
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+#include "../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h"
+#include "../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+__success
+/* prologue */
+__xlated("0: r6 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)")
+__xlated("1: r7 = *(u64 *)(r6 +0)")
+__xlated("2: r7 += 1000")
+__xlated("3: *(u64 *)(r6 +0) = r7")
+/* main prog */
+__xlated("4: if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+5")
+__xlated("5: if r1 == 0x1 goto pc+2")
+__xlated("6: r1 = 1")
+__xlated("7: goto pc-3")
+__xlated("8: r1 = 0")
+__xlated("9: goto pc-6")
+__xlated("10: r0 = 0")
+__xlated("11: exit")
+SEC("struct_ops/test_prologue_goto_start")
+__naked int test_prologue_goto_start(void)
+{
+	asm volatile (
+	"if r1 == 0 goto +5;"
+	"if r1 == 1 goto +2;"
+	"r1 = 1;"
+	"goto -3;"
+	"r1 = 0;"
+	"goto -6;"
+	"r0 = 0;"
+	"exit;"
+	::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+__success
+/* save __u64 *ctx to stack */
+__xlated("0: *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1")
+/* main prog */
+__xlated("1: if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+5")
+__xlated("2: if r1 == 0x1 goto pc+2")
+__xlated("3: r1 = 1")
+__xlated("4: goto pc-3")
+__xlated("5: r1 = 0")
+__xlated("6: goto pc-6")
+__xlated("7: r0 = 0")
+/* epilogue */
+__xlated("8: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)")
+__xlated("9: r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)")
+__xlated("10: r6 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)")
+__xlated("11: r6 += 10000")
+__xlated("12: *(u64 *)(r1 +0) = r6")
+__xlated("13: r0 = r6")
+__xlated("14: r0 *= 2")
+__xlated("15: exit")
+SEC("struct_ops/test_epilogue_goto_start")
+__naked int test_epilogue_goto_start(void)
+{
+	asm volatile (
+	"if r1 == 0 goto +5;"
+	"if r1 == 1 goto +2;"
+	"r1 = 1;"
+	"goto -3;"
+	"r1 = 0;"
+	"goto -6;"
+	"r0 = 0;"
+	"exit;"
+	::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+__success
+/* prologue */
+__xlated("0: r6 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)")
+__xlated("1: r7 = *(u64 *)(r6 +0)")
+__xlated("2: r7 += 1000")
+__xlated("3: *(u64 *)(r6 +0) = r7")
+/* save __u64 *ctx to stack */
+__xlated("4: *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1")
+/* main prog */
+__xlated("5: if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+5")
+__xlated("6: if r1 == 0x1 goto pc+2")
+__xlated("7: r1 = 1")
+__xlated("8: goto pc-3")
+__xlated("9: r1 = 0")
+__xlated("10: goto pc-6")
+__xlated("11: r0 = 0")
+/* epilogue */
+__xlated("12: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)")
+__xlated("13: r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)")
+__xlated("14: r6 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)")
+__xlated("15: r6 += 10000")
+__xlated("16: *(u64 *)(r1 +0) = r6")
+__xlated("17: r0 = r6")
+__xlated("18: r0 *= 2")
+__xlated("19: exit")
+SEC("struct_ops/test_pro_epilogue_goto_start")
+__naked int test_pro_epilogue_goto_start(void)
+{
+	asm volatile (
+	"if r1 == 0 goto +5;"
+	"if r1 == 1 goto +2;"
+	"r1 = 1;"
+	"goto -3;"
+	"r1 = 0;"
+	"goto -6;"
+	"r0 = 0;"
+	"exit;"
+	::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_testmod_st_ops epilogue_goto_start = {
+	.test_prologue = (void *)test_prologue_goto_start,
+	.test_epilogue = (void *)test_epilogue_goto_start,
+	.test_pro_epilogue = (void *)test_pro_epilogue_goto_start,
+};
+
+SEC("syscall")
+__retval(0)
+int syscall_prologue_goto_start(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct st_ops_args args = {};
+
+	return bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_prologue(&args);
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+__retval(20000) /* (EPILOGUE_A [10000]) * 2 */
+int syscall_epilogue_goto_start(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct st_ops_args args = {};
+
+	return bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_epilogue(&args);
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+__retval(22000) /* (PROLOGUE_A [1000] + EPILOGUE_A [10000]) * 2 */
+int syscall_pro_epilogue_goto_start(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct st_ops_args args = {};
+
+	return bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_pro_epilogue(&args);
+}