From patchwork Sat Aug 31 02:36:43 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Pu Lehui X-Patchwork-Id: 13785909 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B3B1249E5; Sat, 31 Aug 2024 02:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725071654; cv=none; b=VnBtRft3gaLBdpHuAlFpaX40C51v+WpnYy9qZ9kNUAlKs4vYT9N/CmTGQf8vJPZ2Jws8jSsA2hVEAos2VpE1juo0lYQ+D+bUSINq2WNxKwRJusmt1Kf5o/9TTQsG3kKa0Awm8MnBoHs0mkeGxLtH+ichXCARZDQiSwCvEpt6qFo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725071654; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1KdrpYMkvJksvy8cxwlc4JQ1StZv1W7PWHgpyxS/Th0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=fCmrsCcnVy5lY9dP3xNMUGOXJBrXEivjs3yckIjhvX38PtHfhvc7hWZsL2Ai+vsRcsUhAxFClQJ6hzbpR4lB2zSMfGGq3Kbjvf1a6GPW2lokazF3l392Q5zKt1bRZ6g+AMuTyXU/xazLbUj60l0dK0mqQRalIIG3ANBirBFEp/U= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.235]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4WwfGT2Lxlz4f3jsg; Sat, 31 Aug 2024 10:33:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.128]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149AA1A06DA; Sat, 31 Aug 2024 10:34:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from ultra.huawei.com (unknown [10.90.53.71]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgDXSYAagdJmoPLJDA--.24950S3; Sat, 31 Aug 2024 10:34:07 +0800 (CST) From: Pu Lehui To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrii Nakryiko Cc: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , Ilya Leoshkevich , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Puranjay Mohan , Palmer Dabbelt , Pu Lehui Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] libbpf: Access first syscall argument with CO-RE direct read on s390 Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 02:36:43 +0000 Message-Id: <20240831023646.1558629-2-pulehui@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240831023646.1558629-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com> References: <20240831023646.1558629-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgDXSYAagdJmoPLJDA--.24950S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7uF17Zr1rWry5Xry3CFWUXFb_yoW8XrWUpF WUCa4xGr1rWr1jkasrKF4avF13Krn5trnrJF93Ww4S9FWUtws5X3429rZ8Aw1av3y5J3yU ZF9Fkr18G3W7Z37anT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUPYb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUGw A2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxS w2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW5JVW7JwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV WxJVW8Jr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_ GcCE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx 0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWU JVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwACI402YVCY1x02628vn2kIc2xKxwCY1x0262kKe7AKxV W8ZVWrXwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E 14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_GFv_WrylIx kGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAF wI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r 4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07jqYL9U UUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: psxovxtxl6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net From: Pu Lehui Currently PT_REGS_PARM1 SYSCALL(x) is consistent with PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE SYSCALL(x), which will introduce the overhead of BPF_CORE_READ(), taking into account the read pt_regs comes directly from the context, let's use CO-RE direct read to access the first system call argument. Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui --- tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h index 9314fa95f04e..e7d9382efeb3 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ struct pt_regs___s390 { unsigned long orig_gpr2; -}; +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); /* s390 provides user_pt_regs instead of struct pt_regs to userspace */ #define __PT_REGS_CAST(x) ((const user_pt_regs *)(x)) @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ struct pt_regs___s390 { #define __PT_PARM4_SYSCALL_REG __PT_PARM4_REG #define __PT_PARM5_SYSCALL_REG __PT_PARM5_REG #define __PT_PARM6_SYSCALL_REG gprs[7] -#define PT_REGS_PARM1_SYSCALL(x) PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE_SYSCALL(x) +#define PT_REGS_PARM1_SYSCALL(x) (((const struct pt_regs___s390 *)(x))->orig_gpr2) #define PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE_SYSCALL(x) \ BPF_CORE_READ((const struct pt_regs___s390 *)(x), __PT_PARM1_SYSCALL_REG)