diff mbox series

selftests: bpf: Replace sizeof(arr)/sizeof(arr[0]) with ARRAY_SIZE

Message ID 20240903072559.292607-1-yangfeng59949@163.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 23457b37ec3f9bb373d43cca61db371303726a1e
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series selftests: bpf: Replace sizeof(arr)/sizeof(arr[0]) with ARRAY_SIZE | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Not a local patch, async
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 fail Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release

Commit Message

yangfeng Sept. 3, 2024, 7:25 a.m. UTC 
From: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>

The ARRAY_SIZE macro is more compact and more formal in linux source.

Signed-off-by: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_stress.c        | 3 ++-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_buf.c             | 5 +++--
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c  | 3 ++-
 .../bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_reject_nbd_invalid.c      | 3 ++-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_test_run.c      | 5 +++--
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_opts.c             | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/unpriv_bpf_disabled.c | 3 ++-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/syscall.c                  | 3 ++-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_rdonly_maps.c         | 3 ++-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c       | 2 +-
 10 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Sept. 4, 2024, 8:30 p.m. UTC | #1 
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:

On Tue,  3 Sep 2024 15:25:59 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
> 
> The ARRAY_SIZE macro is more compact and more formal in linux source.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_stress.c        | 3 ++-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_buf.c             | 5 +++--
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c  | 3 ++-
>  .../bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_reject_nbd_invalid.c      | 3 ++-
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_test_run.c      | 5 +++--
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_opts.c             | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/unpriv_bpf_disabled.c | 3 ++-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/syscall.c                  | 3 ++-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_rdonly_maps.c         | 3 ++-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c       | 2 +-
>  10 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Here is the summary with links:
  - selftests: bpf: Replace sizeof(arr)/sizeof(arr[0]) with ARRAY_SIZE
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/23457b37ec3f

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_stress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_stress.c
index 49b1ffc9af1f..14c91b6f1e83 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_stress.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_stress.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ 
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /* Copyright (c) 2019 Facebook */
 #include <test_progs.h>
+#include "bpf_util.h"
 
 void serial_test_fexit_stress(void)
 {
@@ -36,7 +37,7 @@  void serial_test_fexit_stress(void)
 	for (i = 0; i < bpf_max_tramp_links; i++) {
 		fexit_fd[i] = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, NULL, "GPL",
 					    trace_program,
-					    sizeof(trace_program) / sizeof(struct bpf_insn),
+					    ARRAY_SIZE(trace_program),
 					    &trace_opts);
 		if (!ASSERT_GE(fexit_fd[i], 0, "fexit load"))
 			goto out;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_buf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_buf.c
index 0f7ea4d7d9f6..46611040dec3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_buf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_buf.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ 
 #include <bpf/btf.h>
 
 #include "test_log_buf.skel.h"
+#include "bpf_util.h"
 
 static size_t libbpf_log_pos;
 static char libbpf_log_buf[1024 * 1024];
@@ -143,11 +144,11 @@  static void bpf_prog_load_log_buf(void)
 		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
 		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 	};
-	const size_t good_prog_insn_cnt = sizeof(good_prog_insns) / sizeof(struct bpf_insn);
+	const size_t good_prog_insn_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(good_prog_insns);
 	const struct bpf_insn bad_prog_insns[] = {
 		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 	};
-	size_t bad_prog_insn_cnt = sizeof(bad_prog_insns) / sizeof(struct bpf_insn);
+	size_t bad_prog_insn_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(bad_prog_insns);
 	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts);
 	const size_t log_buf_sz = 1024 * 1024;
 	char *log_buf;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c
index aa9f67eb1c95..bea05f78de5f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ 
 #include <bpf/btf.h>
 #include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h"
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
+#include "bpf_util.h"
 
 static const char *module_name = "bpf_testmod";
 static const char *symbol_name = "bpf_fentry_shadow_test";
@@ -100,7 +101,7 @@  void test_module_fentry_shadow(void)
 		load_opts.attach_btf_obj_fd = btf_fd[i];
 		prog_fd[i] = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, NULL, "GPL",
 					   trace_program,
-					   sizeof(trace_program) / sizeof(struct bpf_insn),
+					   ARRAY_SIZE(trace_program),
 					   &load_opts);
 		if (!ASSERT_GE(prog_fd[i], 0, "bpf_prog_load"))
 			goto out;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_reject_nbd_invalid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_reject_nbd_invalid.c
index e2f1445b0e10..216b0dfac0fe 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_reject_nbd_invalid.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_reject_nbd_invalid.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ 
 
 #include <test_progs.h>
 #include <linux/nbd.h>
+#include "bpf_util.h"
 
 void test_raw_tp_writable_reject_nbd_invalid(void)
 {
@@ -25,7 +26,7 @@  void test_raw_tp_writable_reject_nbd_invalid(void)
 	);
 
 	bpf_fd = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE, NULL, "GPL v2",
-			       program, sizeof(program) / sizeof(struct bpf_insn),
+			       program, ARRAY_SIZE(program),
 			       &opts);
 	if (CHECK(bpf_fd < 0, "bpf_raw_tracepoint_writable load",
 		  "failed: %d errno %d\n", bpf_fd, errno))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_test_run.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_test_run.c
index f4aa7dab4766..e3668058b7bb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_test_run.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_test_run.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ 
 
 #include <test_progs.h>
 #include <linux/nbd.h>
+#include "bpf_util.h"
 
 /* NOTE: conflict with other tests. */
 void serial_test_raw_tp_writable_test_run(void)
@@ -24,7 +25,7 @@  void serial_test_raw_tp_writable_test_run(void)
 	);
 
 	int bpf_fd = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE, NULL, "GPL v2",
-				   trace_program, sizeof(trace_program) / sizeof(struct bpf_insn),
+				   trace_program, ARRAY_SIZE(trace_program),
 				   &trace_opts);
 	if (CHECK(bpf_fd < 0, "bpf_raw_tracepoint_writable loaded",
 		  "failed: %d errno %d\n", bpf_fd, errno))
@@ -41,7 +42,7 @@  void serial_test_raw_tp_writable_test_run(void)
 	);
 
 	int filter_fd = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, NULL, "GPL v2",
-				      skb_program, sizeof(skb_program) / sizeof(struct bpf_insn),
+				      skb_program, ARRAY_SIZE(skb_program),
 				      &skb_opts);
 	if (CHECK(filter_fd < 0, "test_program_loaded", "failed: %d errno %d\n",
 		  filter_fd, errno))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_opts.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_opts.c
index 196abf223465..f77f604389aa 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_opts.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_opts.c
@@ -2384,7 +2384,7 @@  static int generate_dummy_prog(void)
 		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
 		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 	};
-	const size_t prog_insn_cnt = sizeof(prog_insns) / sizeof(struct bpf_insn);
+	const size_t prog_insn_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(prog_insns);
 	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts);
 	const size_t log_buf_sz = 256;
 	char log_buf[log_buf_sz];
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/unpriv_bpf_disabled.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/unpriv_bpf_disabled.c
index 0adf8d9475cb..472f4f9fa95f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/unpriv_bpf_disabled.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/unpriv_bpf_disabled.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ 
 #include "test_unpriv_bpf_disabled.skel.h"
 
 #include "cap_helpers.h"
+#include "bpf_util.h"
 
 /* Using CAP_LAST_CAP is risky here, since it can get pulled in from
  * an old /usr/include/linux/capability.h and be < CAP_BPF; as a result
@@ -146,7 +147,7 @@  static void test_unpriv_bpf_disabled_negative(struct test_unpriv_bpf_disabled *s
 		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
 		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 	};
-	const size_t prog_insn_cnt = sizeof(prog_insns) / sizeof(struct bpf_insn);
+	const size_t prog_insn_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(prog_insns);
 	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, load_opts);
 	struct bpf_map_info map_info = {};
 	__u32 map_info_len = sizeof(map_info);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/syscall.c
index 3d3cafdebe72..0f4dfb770c32 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/syscall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/syscall.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/btf.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <errno.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
 
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
 
@@ -119,7 +120,7 @@  int load_prog(struct args *ctx)
 	static __u64 value = 34;
 	static union bpf_attr prog_load_attr = {
 		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
-		.insn_cnt = sizeof(insns) / sizeof(insns[0]),
+		.insn_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(insns),
 	};
 	int ret;
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_rdonly_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_rdonly_maps.c
index fc8e8a34a3db..7035fb4d4165 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_rdonly_maps.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_rdonly_maps.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/ptrace.h>
 #include <linux/bpf.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
 
 const struct {
 	unsigned a[4];
@@ -64,7 +65,7 @@  int full_loop(struct pt_regs *ctx)
 {
 	/* prevent compiler to optimize everything out */
 	unsigned * volatile p = (void *)&rdonly_values.a;
-	int i = sizeof(rdonly_values.a) / sizeof(rdonly_values.a[0]);
+	int i = ARRAY_SIZE(rdonly_values.a);
 	unsigned iters = 0, sum = 0;
 
 	/* validate verifier can allow full loop as well */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c
index 716113c2bce2..f4da4d508ddb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@  int bits_memalloc(void)
 	int *bit;
 
 	__builtin_memset(&data, 0xf0, sizeof(data)); /* 4 * 16 */
-	bpf_for_each(bits, bit, &data[0], sizeof(data) / sizeof(u64))
+	bpf_for_each(bits, bit, &data[0], ARRAY_SIZE(data))
 		nr++;
 	return nr;
 }