diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v3,3/6] bpf: Zero former ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} args in case of error

Message ID 20240905134813.874-3-daniel@iogearbox.net (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next,v3,1/6] bpf: Fix helper writes to read-only maps | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
netdev/series_format warning Series does not have a cover letter
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 16 this patch: 16
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers fail 2 blamed authors not CCed: sdf@fomichev.me martin.lau@linux.dev; 13 maintainers not CCed: pabeni@redhat.com kuba@kernel.org edumazet@google.com netdev@vger.kernel.org sdf@fomichev.me haoluo@google.com eddyz87@gmail.com jolsa@kernel.org song@kernel.org yonghong.song@linux.dev kpsingh@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev john.fastabend@gmail.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 16 this patch: 16
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 96 this patch: 96
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 100 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 16 this patch: 16
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Daniel Borkmann Sept. 5, 2024, 1:48 p.m. UTC
For all non-tracing helpers which formerly had ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} as input
arguments, zero the value for the case of an error as otherwise it could leak
memory. For tracing, it is not needed given CAP_PERFMON can already read all
kernel memory anyway hence bpf_get_func_arg() and bpf_get_func_ret() is skipped
in here.

Also, rearrange the MTU checker helpers a bit to among other nit fixes
consolidate flag checks such that we only need to zero in one location with
regards to malformed flag inputs.

Fixes: 8a67f2de9b1d ("bpf: expose bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul to all program types")
Fixes: d7a4cb9b6705 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul helpers")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
---
 v1 -> v2:
 - only set *mtu_len in error path (Alexei)

 kernel/bpf/helpers.c |  2 ++
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c |  1 +
 net/core/filter.c    | 35 +++++++++++++++++------------------
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index d2c8945e8297..c0620bad5dc8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -523,6 +523,7 @@  BPF_CALL_4(bpf_strtol, const char *, buf, size_t, buf_len, u64, flags,
 	long long _res;
 	int err;
 
+	*res = 0;
 	err = __bpf_strtoll(buf, buf_len, flags, &_res);
 	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
@@ -551,6 +552,7 @@  BPF_CALL_4(bpf_strtoul, const char *, buf, size_t, buf_len, u64, flags,
 	bool is_negative;
 	int err;
 
+	*res = 0;
 	err = __bpf_strtoull(buf, buf_len, flags, &_res, &is_negative);
 	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index feb276771c03..513b4301a0af 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -5934,6 +5934,7 @@  static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_close_proto = {
 
 BPF_CALL_4(bpf_kallsyms_lookup_name, const char *, name, int, name_sz, int, flags, u64 *, res)
 {
+	*res = 0;
 	if (flags)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 4be175f84eb9..c219385e7bb4 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -6264,18 +6264,19 @@  BPF_CALL_5(bpf_skb_check_mtu, struct sk_buff *, skb,
 	int skb_len, dev_len;
 	int mtu;
 
-	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS)))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if (unlikely(flags & BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS && (len_diff || *mtu_len)))
+	if (unlikely((flags & ~(BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS)) ||
+		     (flags & BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS && (len_diff || *mtu_len)))) {
+		*mtu_len = 0;
 		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
 	dev = __dev_via_ifindex(dev, ifindex);
-	if (unlikely(!dev))
+	if (unlikely(!dev)) {
+		*mtu_len = 0;
 		return -ENODEV;
+	}
 
 	mtu = READ_ONCE(dev->mtu);
-
 	dev_len = mtu + dev->hard_header_len;
 
 	/* If set use *mtu_len as input, L3 as iph->tot_len (like fib_lookup) */
@@ -6286,10 +6287,10 @@  BPF_CALL_5(bpf_skb_check_mtu, struct sk_buff *, skb,
 		ret = BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_SUCCESS;
 		goto out;
 	}
-	/* At this point, skb->len exceed MTU, but as it include length of all
-	 * segments, it can still be below MTU.  The SKB can possibly get
-	 * re-segmented in transmit path (see validate_xmit_skb).  Thus, user
-	 * must choose if segs are to be MTU checked.
+	/* At this point, skb->len exceeds MTU, but as it includes the length
+	 * of all segments, it can still be below MTU. The skb can possibly
+	 * get re-segmented in transmit path (see validate_xmit_skb). Thus,
+	 * the user must choose if segments are to be MTU checked.
 	 */
 	if (skb_is_gso(skb)) {
 		ret = BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_SUCCESS;
@@ -6299,9 +6300,7 @@  BPF_CALL_5(bpf_skb_check_mtu, struct sk_buff *, skb,
 			ret = BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_SEGS_TOOBIG;
 	}
 out:
-	/* BPF verifier guarantees valid pointer */
 	*mtu_len = mtu;
-
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -6314,16 +6313,18 @@  BPF_CALL_5(bpf_xdp_check_mtu, struct xdp_buff *, xdp,
 	int mtu, dev_len;
 
 	/* XDP variant doesn't support multi-buffer segment check (yet) */
-	if (unlikely(flags))
+	if (unlikely(flags)) {
+		*mtu_len = 0;
 		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
 	dev = __dev_via_ifindex(dev, ifindex);
-	if (unlikely(!dev))
+	if (unlikely(!dev)) {
+		*mtu_len = 0;
 		return -ENODEV;
+	}
 
 	mtu = READ_ONCE(dev->mtu);
-
-	/* Add L2-header as dev MTU is L3 size */
 	dev_len = mtu + dev->hard_header_len;
 
 	/* Use *mtu_len as input, L3 as iph->tot_len (like fib_lookup) */
@@ -6334,9 +6335,7 @@  BPF_CALL_5(bpf_xdp_check_mtu, struct xdp_buff *, xdp,
 	if (xdp_len > dev_len)
 		ret = BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_FRAG_NEEDED;
 
-	/* BPF verifier guarantees valid pointer */
 	*mtu_len = mtu;
-
 	return ret;
 }