diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v4,4/8] bpf: Improve check_raw_mode_ok test for MEM_UNINIT-tagged types

Message ID 20240906135608.26477-4-daniel@iogearbox.net (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next,v4,1/8] bpf: Fix bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul helpers for 32bit | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format warning Series does not have a cover letter
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 16 this patch: 16
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 9 maintainers not CCed: sdf@fomichev.me eddyz87@gmail.com haoluo@google.com jolsa@kernel.org kpsingh@kernel.org song@kernel.org yonghong.song@linux.dev martin.lau@linux.dev john.fastabend@gmail.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 16 this patch: 16
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 26 this patch: 26
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 32 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Daniel Borkmann Sept. 6, 2024, 1:56 p.m. UTC
When checking malformed helper function signatures, also take other argument
types into account aside from just ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM.

This concerns (formerly) ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} given uninitialized memory can
be passed there, too.

The func proto sanity check goes back to commit 435faee1aae9 ("bpf, verifier:
add ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK type"), and its purpose was to detect wrong func protos
which had more than just one MEM_UNINIT-tagged type as arguments.

The reason more than one is currently not supported is as we mark stack slots with
STACK_MISC in check_helper_call() in case of raw mode based on meta.access_size to
allow uninitialized stack memory to be passed to helpers when they just write into
the buffer.

Probing for base type as well as MEM_UNINIT tagging ensures that other types do not
get missed (as it used to be the case for ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG}).

Fixes: 57c3bb725a3d ("bpf: Introduce ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} arg types")
Reported-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
---
 v1 -> v2:
 - new patch (Shung-Hsi)
 v2 -> v3:
 - base_type(type) was needed also

 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrii Nakryiko Sept. 6, 2024, 9:03 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 6:56 AM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
>
> When checking malformed helper function signatures, also take other argument
> types into account aside from just ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM.
>
> This concerns (formerly) ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} given uninitialized memory can
> be passed there, too.
>
> The func proto sanity check goes back to commit 435faee1aae9 ("bpf, verifier:
> add ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK type"), and its purpose was to detect wrong func protos
> which had more than just one MEM_UNINIT-tagged type as arguments.
>
> The reason more than one is currently not supported is as we mark stack slots with
> STACK_MISC in check_helper_call() in case of raw mode based on meta.access_size to
> allow uninitialized stack memory to be passed to helpers when they just write into
> the buffer.
>
> Probing for base type as well as MEM_UNINIT tagging ensures that other types do not
> get missed (as it used to be the case for ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG}).
>
> Fixes: 57c3bb725a3d ("bpf: Introduce ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} arg types")
> Reported-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> ---
>  v1 -> v2:
>  - new patch (Shung-Hsi)
>  v2 -> v3:
>  - base_type(type) was needed also
>
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>

LGTM (though I like straight unwrapped lines ;))

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>


> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 3a0801933a79..a1bbe4b401af 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -8291,6 +8291,12 @@ static bool arg_type_is_mem_size(enum bpf_arg_type type)
>                type == ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO;
>  }
>
> +static bool arg_type_is_raw_mem(enum bpf_arg_type type)
> +{
> +       return base_type(type) == ARG_PTR_TO_MEM &&
> +              type & MEM_UNINIT;
> +}
> +
>  static bool arg_type_is_release(enum bpf_arg_type type)
>  {
>         return type & OBJ_RELEASE;
> @@ -9343,15 +9349,15 @@ static bool check_raw_mode_ok(const struct bpf_func_proto *fn)
>  {
>         int count = 0;
>
> -       if (fn->arg1_type == ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM)
> +       if (arg_type_is_raw_mem(fn->arg1_type))
>                 count++;
> -       if (fn->arg2_type == ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM)
> +       if (arg_type_is_raw_mem(fn->arg2_type))
>                 count++;
> -       if (fn->arg3_type == ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM)
> +       if (arg_type_is_raw_mem(fn->arg3_type))
>                 count++;
> -       if (fn->arg4_type == ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM)
> +       if (arg_type_is_raw_mem(fn->arg4_type))
>                 count++;
> -       if (fn->arg5_type == ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM)
> +       if (arg_type_is_raw_mem(fn->arg5_type))
>                 count++;
>
>         /* We only support one arg being in raw mode at the moment,
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Shung-Hsi Yu Sept. 9, 2024, 12:24 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 03:56:04PM GMT, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> When checking malformed helper function signatures, also take other argument
> types into account aside from just ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM.
> 
> This concerns (formerly) ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} given uninitialized memory can
> be passed there, too.
> 
> The func proto sanity check goes back to commit 435faee1aae9 ("bpf, verifier:
> add ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK type"), and its purpose was to detect wrong func protos
> which had more than just one MEM_UNINIT-tagged type as arguments.
> 
> The reason more than one is currently not supported is as we mark stack slots with
> STACK_MISC in check_helper_call() in case of raw mode based on meta.access_size to
> allow uninitialized stack memory to be passed to helpers when they just write into
> the buffer.
> 
> Probing for base type as well as MEM_UNINIT tagging ensures that other types do not
> get missed (as it used to be the case for ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG}).
> 
> Fixes: 57c3bb725a3d ("bpf: Introduce ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} arg types")
> Reported-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 3a0801933a79..a1bbe4b401af 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -8291,6 +8291,12 @@  static bool arg_type_is_mem_size(enum bpf_arg_type type)
 	       type == ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO;
 }
 
+static bool arg_type_is_raw_mem(enum bpf_arg_type type)
+{
+	return base_type(type) == ARG_PTR_TO_MEM &&
+	       type & MEM_UNINIT;
+}
+
 static bool arg_type_is_release(enum bpf_arg_type type)
 {
 	return type & OBJ_RELEASE;
@@ -9343,15 +9349,15 @@  static bool check_raw_mode_ok(const struct bpf_func_proto *fn)
 {
 	int count = 0;
 
-	if (fn->arg1_type == ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM)
+	if (arg_type_is_raw_mem(fn->arg1_type))
 		count++;
-	if (fn->arg2_type == ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM)
+	if (arg_type_is_raw_mem(fn->arg2_type))
 		count++;
-	if (fn->arg3_type == ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM)
+	if (arg_type_is_raw_mem(fn->arg3_type))
 		count++;
-	if (fn->arg4_type == ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM)
+	if (arg_type_is_raw_mem(fn->arg4_type))
 		count++;
-	if (fn->arg5_type == ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM)
+	if (arg_type_is_raw_mem(fn->arg5_type))
 		count++;
 
 	/* We only support one arg being in raw mode at the moment,