diff mbox series

[bpf-next] libbpf: Fix expected_attach_type set when kernel not support

Message ID 20240913121627.153898-1-chen.dylane@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next] libbpf: Fix expected_attach_type set when kernel not support | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 7 this patch: 7
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 4 this patch: 4
netdev/cc_maintainers fail 1 blamed authors not CCed: ast@kernel.org; 1 maintainers not CCed: ast@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 7 this patch: 7
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 7 this patch: 7
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 8 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Tao Chen Sept. 13, 2024, 12:16 p.m. UTC 
The commit "5902da6d8a52" set expected_attach_type again with
filed of bpf_program after libpf_prepare_prog_load, which makes
expected_attach_type = 0 no sense when kenrel not support the
attach_type feature, so fix it.

Fixes: 5902da6d8a52 ("libbpf: Add uprobe multi link support to bpf_program__attach_usdt")
Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@gmail.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Jiri Olsa Sept. 13, 2024, 1:48 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 08:16:27PM +0800, Tao Chen wrote:
> The commit "5902da6d8a52" set expected_attach_type again with
> filed of bpf_program after libpf_prepare_prog_load, which makes
> expected_attach_type = 0 no sense when kenrel not support the
> attach_type feature, so fix it.
> 
> Fixes: 5902da6d8a52 ("libbpf: Add uprobe multi link support to bpf_program__attach_usdt")
> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 219facd0e66e..9035edf763a3 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -7343,7 +7343,7 @@ static int libbpf_prepare_prog_load(struct bpf_program *prog,
>  
>  	/* old kernels might not support specifying expected_attach_type */
>  	if ((def & SEC_EXP_ATTACH_OPT) && !kernel_supports(prog->obj, FEAT_EXP_ATTACH_TYPE))
> -		opts->expected_attach_type = 0;
> +		prog->expected_attach_type = 0;
>  
>  	if (def & SEC_SLEEPABLE)
>  		opts->prog_flags |= BPF_F_SLEEPABLE;
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

good catch! thanks

I can't remember why it was needed, perhaps we should go back to where it 
was before?

I'm guessing prog->expected_attach_type might not get updated properly and
that might cause issues, not sure

thanks,
jirka


---
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 219facd0e66e..df2244397ba1 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -7353,7 +7353,7 @@ static int libbpf_prepare_prog_load(struct bpf_program *prog,
 
 	/* special check for usdt to use uprobe_multi link */
 	if ((def & SEC_USDT) && kernel_supports(prog->obj, FEAT_UPROBE_MULTI_LINK))
-		prog->expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI;
+		opts->expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI;
 
 	if ((def & SEC_ATTACH_BTF) && !prog->attach_btf_id) {
 		int btf_obj_fd = 0, btf_type_id = 0, err;
@@ -7443,6 +7443,7 @@ static int bpf_object_load_prog(struct bpf_object *obj, struct bpf_program *prog
 	load_attr.attach_btf_id = prog->attach_btf_id;
 	load_attr.kern_version = kern_version;
 	load_attr.prog_ifindex = prog->prog_ifindex;
+	load_attr.expected_attach_type = prog->expected_attach_type;
 
 	/* specify func_info/line_info only if kernel supports them */
 	if (obj->btf && btf__fd(obj->btf) >= 0 && kernel_supports(obj, FEAT_BTF_FUNC)) {
@@ -7474,9 +7475,6 @@ static int bpf_object_load_prog(struct bpf_object *obj, struct bpf_program *prog
 		insns_cnt = prog->insns_cnt;
 	}
 
-	/* allow prog_prepare_load_fn to change expected_attach_type */
-	load_attr.expected_attach_type = prog->expected_attach_type;
-
 	if (obj->gen_loader) {
 		bpf_gen__prog_load(obj->gen_loader, prog->type, prog->name,
 				   license, insns, insns_cnt, &load_attr,
Tao Chen Sept. 13, 2024, 3:14 p.m. UTC | #2 
在 2024/9/13 21:48, Jiri Olsa 写道:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 08:16:27PM +0800, Tao Chen wrote:
>> The commit "5902da6d8a52" set expected_attach_type again with
>> filed of bpf_program after libpf_prepare_prog_load, which makes
>> expected_attach_type = 0 no sense when kenrel not support the
>> attach_type feature, so fix it.
>>
>> Fixes: 5902da6d8a52 ("libbpf: Add uprobe multi link support to bpf_program__attach_usdt")
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> index 219facd0e66e..9035edf763a3 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> @@ -7343,7 +7343,7 @@ static int libbpf_prepare_prog_load(struct bpf_program *prog,
>>   
>>   	/* old kernels might not support specifying expected_attach_type */
>>   	if ((def & SEC_EXP_ATTACH_OPT) && !kernel_supports(prog->obj, FEAT_EXP_ATTACH_TYPE))
>> -		opts->expected_attach_type = 0;
>> +		prog->expected_attach_type = 0;
>>   
>>   	if (def & SEC_SLEEPABLE)
>>   		opts->prog_flags |= BPF_F_SLEEPABLE;
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>>
> 
> good catch! thanks
> 
> I can't remember why it was needed, perhaps we should go back to where it
> was before?
> 
> I'm guessing prog->expected_attach_type might not get updated properly and
> that might cause issues, not sure
> 
> thanks,
> jirka
> 
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 219facd0e66e..df2244397ba1 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -7353,7 +7353,7 @@ static int libbpf_prepare_prog_load(struct bpf_program *prog,
>   
>   	/* special check for usdt to use uprobe_multi link */
>   	if ((def & SEC_USDT) && kernel_supports(prog->obj, FEAT_UPROBE_MULTI_LINK))
> -		prog->expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI;
> +		opts->expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI;
>   
>   	if ((def & SEC_ATTACH_BTF) && !prog->attach_btf_id) {
>   		int btf_obj_fd = 0, btf_type_id = 0, err;
> @@ -7443,6 +7443,7 @@ static int bpf_object_load_prog(struct bpf_object *obj, struct bpf_program *prog
>   	load_attr.attach_btf_id = prog->attach_btf_id;
>   	load_attr.kern_version = kern_version;
>   	load_attr.prog_ifindex = prog->prog_ifindex;
> +	load_attr.expected_attach_type = prog->expected_attach_type;
>   
>   	/* specify func_info/line_info only if kernel supports them */
>   	if (obj->btf && btf__fd(obj->btf) >= 0 && kernel_supports(obj, FEAT_BTF_FUNC)) {
> @@ -7474,9 +7475,6 @@ static int bpf_object_load_prog(struct bpf_object *obj, struct bpf_program *prog
>   		insns_cnt = prog->insns_cnt;
>   	}
>   
> -	/* allow prog_prepare_load_fn to change expected_attach_type */
> -	load_attr.expected_attach_type = prog->expected_attach_type;
> -
>   	if (obj->gen_loader) {
>   		bpf_gen__prog_load(obj->gen_loader, prog->type, prog->name,
>   				   license, insns, insns_cnt, &load_attr,


Hi, Jiri, thank you for your reply.
It looks better your way, i will send it in v2.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 219facd0e66e..9035edf763a3 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -7343,7 +7343,7 @@  static int libbpf_prepare_prog_load(struct bpf_program *prog,
 
 	/* old kernels might not support specifying expected_attach_type */
 	if ((def & SEC_EXP_ATTACH_OPT) && !kernel_supports(prog->obj, FEAT_EXP_ATTACH_TYPE))
-		opts->expected_attach_type = 0;
+		prog->expected_attach_type = 0;
 
 	if (def & SEC_SLEEPABLE)
 		opts->prog_flags |= BPF_F_SLEEPABLE;