diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2,1/2] libbpf: do not resolve size on duplicate FUNCs

Message ID 20240929-libbpf-dup-extern-funcs-v2-1-0cc81de3f79f@hack3r.moe (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series BPF static linker: fix failure when encountering duplicate extern functions | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 4 this patch: 4
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 10 maintainers not CCed: sdf@fomichev.me eddyz87@gmail.com haoluo@google.com jolsa@kernel.org daniel@iogearbox.net song@kernel.org yonghong.song@linux.dev kpsingh@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev john.fastabend@gmail.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 7 this patch: 7
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 7 this patch: 7
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 105 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 81 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 94 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Eric Long via B4 Relay Sept. 29, 2024, 9:31 a.m. UTC
From: Eric Long <i@hack3r.moe>

FUNCs do not have sizes, thus currently btf__resolve_size will fail
with -EINVAL. Add conditions so that we only update size when the BTF
object is not function or function prototype.

Signed-off-by: Eric Long <i@hack3r.moe>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/linker.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Alexei Starovoitov Sept. 29, 2024, 4:32 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 2:31 AM Eric Long via B4 Relay
<devnull+i.hack3r.moe@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Eric Long <i@hack3r.moe>
>
> FUNCs do not have sizes, thus currently btf__resolve_size will fail
> with -EINVAL. Add conditions so that we only update size when the BTF
> object is not function or function prototype.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Long <i@hack3r.moe>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/linker.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
> index 81dbbdd79a7c65a4b048b85e1dba99cb5f7cb56b..cffb388fa40ef054c2661b8363120f8a4d3c3784 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
> @@ -2452,17 +2452,20 @@ static int linker_append_btf(struct bpf_linker *linker, struct src_obj *obj)
>                                 __s64 sz;
>
>                                 dst_var = &dst_sec->sec_vars[glob_sym->var_idx];
> -                               /* Because underlying BTF type might have
> -                                * changed, so might its size have changed, so
> -                                * re-calculate and update it in sec_var.
> -                                */
> -                               sz = btf__resolve_size(linker->btf, glob_sym->underlying_btf_id);
> -                               if (sz < 0) {
> -                                       pr_warn("global '%s': failed to resolve size of underlying type: %d\n",
> -                                               name, (int)sz);
> -                                       return -EINVAL;
> +                               t = btf__type_by_id(linker->btf, glob_sym->underlying_btf_id);
> +                               if (btf_kind(t) != BTF_KIND_FUNC && btf_kind(t) != BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO) {
> +                                       /* Because underlying BTF type might have
> +                                        * changed, so might its size have changed, so
> +                                        * re-calculate and update it in sec_var.
> +                                        */
> +                                       sz = btf__resolve_size(linker->btf, glob_sym->underlying_btf_id);
> +                                       if (sz < 0) {
> +                                               pr_warn("global '%s': failed to resolve size of underlying type: %d\n",
> +                                                       name, (int)sz);
> +                                               return -EINVAL;
> +                                       }
> +                                       dst_var->size = sz;

Looks like a hack to me.

In the test you're using:
void *bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx(void *obj) __ksym;

but __weak is missing.
Is that the reason you're hitting this issue?
Eric Long Sept. 29, 2024, 5:45 p.m. UTC | #2
On 30/09/2024 00:32, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 2:31 AM Eric Long via B4 Relay
> <devnull+i.hack3r.moe@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> Looks like a hack to me.
> 
> In the test you're using:
> void *bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx(void *obj) __ksym;
> 
> but __weak is missing.
> Is that the reason you're hitting this issue?
> 

No. libbpf still returns -EINVAL (from the same path) even if the 
prototype is marked __weak, when the patch is not applied.

(Sorry for the off-list reply)
Andrii Nakryiko Sept. 30, 2024, 10:44 p.m. UTC | #3
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 2:31 AM Eric Long via B4 Relay
<devnull+i.hack3r.moe@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Eric Long <i@hack3r.moe>
>
> FUNCs do not have sizes, thus currently btf__resolve_size will fail
> with -EINVAL. Add conditions so that we only update size when the BTF
> object is not function or function prototype.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Long <i@hack3r.moe>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/linker.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
> index 81dbbdd79a7c65a4b048b85e1dba99cb5f7cb56b..cffb388fa40ef054c2661b8363120f8a4d3c3784 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
> @@ -2452,17 +2452,20 @@ static int linker_append_btf(struct bpf_linker *linker, struct src_obj *obj)
>                                 __s64 sz;
>
>                                 dst_var = &dst_sec->sec_vars[glob_sym->var_idx];
> -                               /* Because underlying BTF type might have
> -                                * changed, so might its size have changed, so
> -                                * re-calculate and update it in sec_var.
> -                                */
> -                               sz = btf__resolve_size(linker->btf, glob_sym->underlying_btf_id);
> -                               if (sz < 0) {
> -                                       pr_warn("global '%s': failed to resolve size of underlying type: %d\n",
> -                                               name, (int)sz);
> -                                       return -EINVAL;
> +                               t = btf__type_by_id(linker->btf, glob_sym->underlying_btf_id);
> +                               if (btf_kind(t) != BTF_KIND_FUNC && btf_kind(t) != BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO) {

this is sloppy, it can't be both.

Why can't be it a much simpler and cleaner:

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
index 81dbbdd79a7c..f83c1c29982c 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
@@ -2451,6 +2451,10 @@ static int linker_append_btf(struct bpf_linker
*linker, struct src_obj *obj)
                        if (glob_sym && glob_sym->var_idx >= 0) {
                                __s64 sz;

+                               /* FUNCs don't have size, nothing to update */
+                               if (btf_is_func(t))
+                                       continue;
+
                                dst_var = &dst_sec->sec_vars[glob_sym->var_idx];
                                /* Because underlying BTF type might have
                                 * changed, so might its size have changed, so

?

pw-bot: cr

> +                                       /* Because underlying BTF type might have
> +                                        * changed, so might its size have changed, so
> +                                        * re-calculate and update it in sec_var.
> +                                        */
> +                                       sz = btf__resolve_size(linker->btf, glob_sym->underlying_btf_id);
> +                                       if (sz < 0) {
> +                                               pr_warn("global '%s': failed to resolve size of underlying type: %d\n",
> +                                                       name, (int)sz);
> +                                               return -EINVAL;
> +                                       }
> +                                       dst_var->size = sz;
>                                 }
> -                               dst_var->size = sz;
>                                 continue;
>                         }
>
>
> --
> 2.46.2
>
>
Andrii Nakryiko Sept. 30, 2024, 10:48 p.m. UTC | #4
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 9:32 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 2:31 AM Eric Long via B4 Relay
> <devnull+i.hack3r.moe@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Eric Long <i@hack3r.moe>
> >
> > FUNCs do not have sizes, thus currently btf__resolve_size will fail
> > with -EINVAL. Add conditions so that we only update size when the BTF
> > object is not function or function prototype.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Long <i@hack3r.moe>
> > ---
> >  tools/lib/bpf/linker.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
> > index 81dbbdd79a7c65a4b048b85e1dba99cb5f7cb56b..cffb388fa40ef054c2661b8363120f8a4d3c3784 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
> > @@ -2452,17 +2452,20 @@ static int linker_append_btf(struct bpf_linker *linker, struct src_obj *obj)
> >                                 __s64 sz;
> >
> >                                 dst_var = &dst_sec->sec_vars[glob_sym->var_idx];
> > -                               /* Because underlying BTF type might have
> > -                                * changed, so might its size have changed, so
> > -                                * re-calculate and update it in sec_var.
> > -                                */
> > -                               sz = btf__resolve_size(linker->btf, glob_sym->underlying_btf_id);
> > -                               if (sz < 0) {
> > -                                       pr_warn("global '%s': failed to resolve size of underlying type: %d\n",
> > -                                               name, (int)sz);
> > -                                       return -EINVAL;
> > +                               t = btf__type_by_id(linker->btf, glob_sym->underlying_btf_id);
> > +                               if (btf_kind(t) != BTF_KIND_FUNC && btf_kind(t) != BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO) {
> > +                                       /* Because underlying BTF type might have
> > +                                        * changed, so might its size have changed, so
> > +                                        * re-calculate and update it in sec_var.
> > +                                        */
> > +                                       sz = btf__resolve_size(linker->btf, glob_sym->underlying_btf_id);
> > +                                       if (sz < 0) {
> > +                                               pr_warn("global '%s': failed to resolve size of underlying type: %d\n",
> > +                                                       name, (int)sz);
> > +                                               return -EINVAL;
> > +                                       }
> > +                                       dst_var->size = sz;
>
> Looks like a hack to me.
>
> In the test you're using:
> void *bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx(void *obj) __ksym;
>
> but __weak is missing.
> Is that the reason you're hitting this issue?

This is the real issue, unfortunately. And the reason we have this
size update is due to weak *variables*. When the weak variable is
overridden by a "strong" variable or extern is resolved to a concrete
variable, its underlying type might change (e.g., FWD to STRUCT, but
probably there are other cases). Details are a bit hazy by now.

But in any case, this size updating logic should only apply to
variables, so filtering out FUNCs is the straightforward solution. It
can just be coded a bit more nicely, which I suggested in a separate
reply.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
index 81dbbdd79a7c65a4b048b85e1dba99cb5f7cb56b..cffb388fa40ef054c2661b8363120f8a4d3c3784 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
@@ -2452,17 +2452,20 @@  static int linker_append_btf(struct bpf_linker *linker, struct src_obj *obj)
 				__s64 sz;
 
 				dst_var = &dst_sec->sec_vars[glob_sym->var_idx];
-				/* Because underlying BTF type might have
-				 * changed, so might its size have changed, so
-				 * re-calculate and update it in sec_var.
-				 */
-				sz = btf__resolve_size(linker->btf, glob_sym->underlying_btf_id);
-				if (sz < 0) {
-					pr_warn("global '%s': failed to resolve size of underlying type: %d\n",
-						name, (int)sz);
-					return -EINVAL;
+				t = btf__type_by_id(linker->btf, glob_sym->underlying_btf_id);
+				if (btf_kind(t) != BTF_KIND_FUNC && btf_kind(t) != BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO) {
+					/* Because underlying BTF type might have
+					 * changed, so might its size have changed, so
+					 * re-calculate and update it in sec_var.
+					 */
+					sz = btf__resolve_size(linker->btf, glob_sym->underlying_btf_id);
+					if (sz < 0) {
+						pr_warn("global '%s': failed to resolve size of underlying type: %d\n",
+							name, (int)sz);
+						return -EINVAL;
+					}
+					dst_var->size = sz;
 				}
-				dst_var->size = sz;
 				continue;
 			}