diff mbox series

[PATCHv5,bpf-next,05/13] bpf: Allow return values 0 and 1 for uprobe/kprobe session

Message ID 20240929205717.3813648-6-jolsa@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series uprobe, bpf: Add session support | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 5 maintainers not CCed: song@kernel.org yonghong.song@linux.dev eddyz87@gmail.com kpsingh@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 7 this patch: 7
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 17 this patch: 17
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 16 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Jiri Olsa Sept. 29, 2024, 8:57 p.m. UTC 
The uprobe and kprobe session program can return only 0 or 1,
instruct verifier to check for that.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

Comments

Andrii Nakryiko Sept. 30, 2024, 9:36 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 1:58 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> The uprobe and kprobe session program can return only 0 or 1,
> instruct verifier to check for that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>

Do we need Fixes: tag?

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>


> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 7d9b38ffd220..c4d7b7369259 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -15910,6 +15910,16 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, const char
>                         return -ENOTSUPP;
>                 }
>                 break;
> +       case BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE:
> +               switch (env->prog->expected_attach_type) {
> +               case BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION:
> +               case BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION:
> +                       range = retval_range(0, 1);
> +                       break;
> +               default:
> +                       return 0;
> +               }
> +               break;
>         case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP:
>                 range = retval_range(SK_DROP, SK_PASS);
>                 break;
> --
> 2.46.1
>
Jiri Olsa Oct. 1, 2024, 1:18 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 02:36:28PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 1:58 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The uprobe and kprobe session program can return only 0 or 1,
> > instruct verifier to check for that.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> 
> Do we need Fixes: tag?

right, for kprobe session, will add

thanks,
jirka

> 
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> 
> 
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > index 7d9b38ffd220..c4d7b7369259 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > @@ -15910,6 +15910,16 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, const char
> >                         return -ENOTSUPP;
> >                 }
> >                 break;
> > +       case BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE:
> > +               switch (env->prog->expected_attach_type) {
> > +               case BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION:
> > +               case BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION:
> > +                       range = retval_range(0, 1);
> > +                       break;
> > +               default:
> > +                       return 0;
> > +               }
> > +               break;
> >         case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP:
> >                 range = retval_range(SK_DROP, SK_PASS);
> >                 break;
> > --
> > 2.46.1
> >
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 7d9b38ffd220..c4d7b7369259 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -15910,6 +15910,16 @@  static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, const char
 			return -ENOTSUPP;
 		}
 		break;
+	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE:
+		switch (env->prog->expected_attach_type) {
+		case BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION:
+		case BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION:
+			range = retval_range(0, 1);
+			break;
+		default:
+			return 0;
+		}
+		break;
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP:
 		range = retval_range(SK_DROP, SK_PASS);
 		break;