@@ -3139,6 +3139,14 @@ static struct pernet_operations ipmr_net_ops = {
.exit_batch = ipmr_net_exit_batch,
};
+static const struct rtnl_msg_handler ipmr_rtnl_msg_handlers[] = {
+ {NULL, RTNL_FAMILY_IPMR, RTM_GETLINK, NULL, ipmr_rtm_dumplink, 0},
+ {NULL, RTNL_FAMILY_IPMR, RTM_NEWROUTE, ipmr_rtm_route, NULL, 0},
+ {NULL, RTNL_FAMILY_IPMR, RTM_DELROUTE, ipmr_rtm_route, NULL, 0},
+ {NULL, RTNL_FAMILY_IPMR, RTM_GETROUTE,
+ ipmr_rtm_getroute, ipmr_rtm_dumproute, 0},
+};
+
int __init ip_mr_init(void)
{
int err;
@@ -3159,15 +3167,8 @@ int __init ip_mr_init(void)
goto add_proto_fail;
}
#endif
- rtnl_register(RTNL_FAMILY_IPMR, RTM_GETROUTE,
- ipmr_rtm_getroute, ipmr_rtm_dumproute, 0);
- rtnl_register(RTNL_FAMILY_IPMR, RTM_NEWROUTE,
- ipmr_rtm_route, NULL, 0);
- rtnl_register(RTNL_FAMILY_IPMR, RTM_DELROUTE,
- ipmr_rtm_route, NULL, 0);
-
- rtnl_register(RTNL_FAMILY_IPMR, RTM_GETLINK,
- NULL, ipmr_rtm_dumplink, 0);
+ rtnl_register_many(ipmr_rtnl_msg_handlers);
+
return 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_PIMSM_V2
@@ -1369,6 +1369,11 @@ static struct pernet_operations ip6mr_net_ops = {
.exit_batch = ip6mr_net_exit_batch,
};
+static const struct rtnl_msg_handler ip6mr_rtnl_msg_handlers[] = {
+ {THIS_MODULE, RTNL_FAMILY_IP6MR, RTM_GETROUTE,
+ ip6mr_rtm_getroute, ip6mr_rtm_dumproute, 0},
+};
+
int __init ip6_mr_init(void)
{
int err;
@@ -1391,9 +1396,8 @@ int __init ip6_mr_init(void)
goto add_proto_fail;
}
#endif
- err = rtnl_register_module(THIS_MODULE, RTNL_FAMILY_IP6MR, RTM_GETROUTE,
- ip6mr_rtm_getroute, ip6mr_rtm_dumproute, 0);
- if (err == 0)
+ err = rtnl_register_many(ip6mr_rtnl_msg_handlers);
+ if (!err)
return 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_PIMSM_V2
@@ -1410,7 +1414,7 @@ int __init ip6_mr_init(void)
void ip6_mr_cleanup(void)
{
- rtnl_unregister(RTNL_FAMILY_IP6MR, RTM_GETROUTE);
+ rtnl_unregister_many(ip6mr_rtnl_msg_handlers);
#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_PIMSM_V2
inet6_del_protocol(&pim6_protocol, IPPROTO_PIM);
#endif
We will remove rtnl_register() and rtnl_register_module() in favour of rtnl_register_many(). When it succeeds for built-in callers, rtnl_register_many() guarantees all rtnetlink types in the passed array are supported, and there is no chance that a part of message types is not supported. Let's use rtnl_register_many() instead. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> --- net/ipv4/ipmr.c | 19 ++++++++++--------- net/ipv6/ip6mr.c | 12 ++++++++---- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)