From patchwork Tue Oct 15 09:10:49 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jiri Olsa X-Patchwork-Id: 13835984 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3CAA1D5AC3 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728983604; cv=none; b=s3ho6RVYsZhSwBup/g9y0Rfd6LghVZeK7CN1OgZATzeUCBcjtOz8XTTp5U1GQ09AyvZnK04NWpm8USIgIDPTnixv5/tVSXE0Tg+EqRFFSEEjkSGInSMudqk35a6Vd1gaWzVn3oe8gsji9dfbypLoFaq3jMBy7L70A90V98v/Spo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728983604; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SRJ7iIqpFdc57svkJVfVWiyC4I6Wo1VBhjnyzeaFXpg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=LW9iU2j9XIW3RlU2Jp8zAT3hs4AMiPr6nQeiDJXiPwVlqXfUNHTeY6ab56IFscB+6YaJE2mPz8U9l6C3nGMU509nZSlbTA+uCcQ6+INXvf9IxWv2+vlpyPZDhz3S/MUEU/FWC2OPirvVAC72oDZkMfOi3Suqkc5g4vRXJWQk4Nk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Y9Eq2ng2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Y9Eq2ng2" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 857FEC4CEC6; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:13:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1728983603; bh=SRJ7iIqpFdc57svkJVfVWiyC4I6Wo1VBhjnyzeaFXpg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Y9Eq2ng2GsbBiPgD1y14z66g40LHNROsT4/Vf8nE8jbxwPfCIJOTiF9XHnJQYcU5j UrGsl1ttuyJQ/nSlfwgkTcp5Ru+p80f1W82PBOyslbJaPA3lYSaVpXVMVPNlPWZGMZ v2TeVJKp1hIgV841gjxcSTqpcnJ2DlCLmrH+KHGZaDHOGr/J2/v3fyrkD8xYVa29bi GLluWzN+i8gu7baI/NwULBex1s/ohE2fF3lpagCdogYpRTMiYWp5JDjqOFy/XHUYZ4 nKZcyENu7+f3cC/vb3o4Z1Z64IqbdBb787bxkXXLL14jSfqPk9iZNyvHZbfIvN8hyj kfCJizZp6kMBg== From: Jiri Olsa To: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo Subject: [PATCHv7 bpf-next 14/15] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe sessions to consumer test Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 11:10:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20241015091050.3731669-15-jolsa@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.2 In-Reply-To: <20241015091050.3731669-1-jolsa@kernel.org> References: <20241015091050.3731669-1-jolsa@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Adding uprobe session consumers to the consumer test, so we get the session into the test mix. In addition scaling down the test to have just 1 uprobe and 1 uretprobe, otherwise the test time grows and is unsuitable for CI even with threads. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa --- .../bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c | 68 +++++++++++++------ .../bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c | 6 +- 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c index 7e0228f8fcfc..e96b153a0f5d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c @@ -799,10 +799,13 @@ static int uprobe_attach(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int idx) return -1; /* - * bit/prog: 0,1 uprobe entry - * bit/prog: 2,3 uprobe return + * bit/prog: 0 uprobe entry + * bit/prog: 1 uprobe return + * bit/prog: 2 uprobe session without return + * bit/prog: 3 uprobe session with return */ - opts.retprobe = idx == 2 || idx == 3; + opts.retprobe = idx == 1; + opts.session = idx == 2 || idx == 3; *link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(prog, 0, "/proc/self/exe", "uprobe_consumer_test", @@ -867,29 +870,55 @@ static int consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, goto cleanup; for (idx = 0; idx < 4; idx++) { + unsigned long had_uretprobes; const char *fmt = "BUG"; __u64 val = 0; - if (idx < 2) { + switch (idx) { + case 0: /* * uprobe entry * +1 if define in 'before' */ if (test_bit(idx, before)) val++; - fmt = "prog 0/1: uprobe"; - } else { + fmt = "prog 0: uprobe"; + break; + case 1: /* * to trigger uretprobe consumer, the uretprobe needs to be installed, * which means one of the 'return' uprobes was alive when probe was hit: * - * idxs: 2/3 uprobe return in 'installed' mask + * idxs: 1/2 uprobe return in 'installed' mask */ - unsigned long had_uretprobes = before & 0b1100; /* is uretprobe installed */ + had_uretprobes = before & 0b0110; /* is uretprobe installed */ if (had_uretprobes && test_bit(idx, after)) val++; - fmt = "idx 2/3: uretprobe"; + fmt = "prog 1: uretprobe"; + break; + case 2: + /* + * session with return + * +1 if defined in 'before' + * +1 if defined in 'after' + */ + if (test_bit(idx, before)) { + val++; + if (test_bit(idx, after)) + val++; + } + fmt = "prog 2: session with return"; + break; + case 3: + /* + * session without return + * +1 if defined in 'before' + */ + if (test_bit(idx, before)) + val++; + fmt = "prog 3: session with NO return"; + break; } if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_result[idx], val, fmt)) @@ -918,8 +947,10 @@ static void test_consumers(void) * The idea of this test is to try all possible combinations of * uprobes consumers attached on single function. * - * - 2 uprobe entry consumer - * - 2 uprobe exit consumers + * - 1 uprobe entry consumer + * - 1 uprobe exit consumer + * - 1 uprobe session with return + * - 1 uprobe session without return * * The test uses 4 uprobes attached on single function, but that * translates into single uprobe with 4 consumers in kernel. @@ -927,25 +958,24 @@ static void test_consumers(void) * The before/after values present the state of attached consumers * before and after the probed function: * - * bit/prog 0,1 : uprobe entry - * bit/prog 2,3 : uprobe return + * bit/prog 0 : uprobe entry + * bit/prog 1 : uprobe return * * For example for: * - * before = 0b0101 - * after = 0b0110 + * before = 0b01 + * after = 0b10 * * it means that before we call 'uprobe_consumer_test' we attach * uprobes defined in 'before' value: * - * - bit/prog 0: uprobe entry - * - bit/prog 2: uprobe return + * - bit/prog 1: uprobe entry * * uprobe_consumer_test is called and inside it we attach and detach * uprobes based on 'after' value: * - * - bit/prog 0: stays untouched - * - bit/prog 2: uprobe return is detached + * - bit/prog 0: is detached + * - bit/prog 1: is attached * * uprobe_consumer_test returns and we check counters values increased * by bpf programs on each uprobe to match the expected count based on diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c index 7e0fdcbbd242..93752bb5690b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c @@ -24,16 +24,16 @@ int uprobe_1(struct pt_regs *ctx) return 0; } -SEC("uprobe.multi") +SEC("uprobe.session") int uprobe_2(struct pt_regs *ctx) { uprobe_result[2]++; return 0; } -SEC("uprobe.multi") +SEC("uprobe.session") int uprobe_3(struct pt_regs *ctx) { uprobe_result[3]++; - return 0; + return 1; }