diff mbox series

[bpf-next,4/6] selftests/bpf: add ipv4 and dual ipv4/ipv6 support in btf_skc_cls_ingress

Message ID 20241016-syncookie-v1-4-3b7a0de12153@bootlin.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series selftests/bpf: integrate test_tcp_check_syncookie.sh into test_progs | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 5 this patch: 5
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 0 (+1) this patch: 0 (+1)
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 17 of 17 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 5 this patch: 5
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 304 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) Oct. 16, 2024, 6:35 p.m. UTC
btf_skc_cls_ingress test currently checks that syncookie and
bpf_sk_assign/release helpers behave correctly in multiple scenarios,
but only with ipv4 socket.

Increase those helpers coverage by adding testing support for IPv6-only
sockets and IPv4/IPv6 sockets. The rework is mostly based on features
brought earlier in test_tcp_check_syncookie.sh to cover some fixes
performed on those helpers, but test_tcp_check_syncookie.sh is not
integrated in test_progs. The most notable changes linked to this are:
- some rework in the corresponding eBPF program to support both types of
  traffic
- the switch from start_server to start_server_str to allow to check
  some socket options
- the introduction of new subtests for ipv4 and ipv4/ipv6

Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
---
The rework has been tested in a local Qemu environment and in CI:
  # ./test_progs -a btf_skc_cls_ingress
  #38/1    btf_skc_cls_ingress/conn_ipv4:OK
  #38/2    btf_skc_cls_ingress/conn_ipv6:OK
  #38/3    btf_skc_cls_ingress/conn_dual:OK
  #38/4    btf_skc_cls_ingress/syncookie_ipv4:OK
  #38/5    btf_skc_cls_ingress/syncookie_ipv6:OK
  #38/6    btf_skc_cls_ingress/syncookie_dual:OK
  #38      btf_skc_cls_ingress:OK
  Summary: 1/6 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++---
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_btf_skc_cls_ingress.c |  81 +++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c
index a20d104f9909e5ba20ddc4c107b910956f042fc1..e0f8fe818f4230a1d5bf0118133c5a9fb50345e1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c
@@ -19,6 +19,15 @@ 
 
 #define TEST_NS "skc_cls_ingress"
 
+#define BIT(n)		(1 << (n))
+#define TEST_MODE_IPV4	BIT(0)
+#define TEST_MODE_IPV6	BIT(1)
+#define TEST_MODE_DUAL	(TEST_MODE_IPV4 | TEST_MODE_IPV6)
+
+#define SERVER_ADDR_IPV4	"127.0.0.1"
+#define SERVER_ADDR_IPV6	"::1"
+#define SERVER_ADDR_DUAL	"::0"
+
 static struct netns_obj *prepare_netns(struct test_btf_skc_cls_ingress *skel)
 {
 	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_hook, qdisc_lo, .attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS);
@@ -57,6 +66,7 @@  static struct netns_obj *prepare_netns(struct test_btf_skc_cls_ingress *skel)
 
 static void reset_test(struct test_btf_skc_cls_ingress *skel)
 {
+	memset(&skel->bss->srv_sa4, 0, sizeof(skel->bss->srv_sa4));
 	memset(&skel->bss->srv_sa6, 0, sizeof(skel->bss->srv_sa6));
 	skel->bss->listen_tp_sport = 0;
 	skel->bss->req_sk_sport = 0;
@@ -71,26 +81,84 @@  static void print_err_line(struct test_btf_skc_cls_ingress *skel)
 		printf("bpf prog error at line %u\n", skel->bss->linum);
 }
 
-static void run_test(struct test_btf_skc_cls_ingress *skel, bool gen_cookies)
+static int v6only_true(int fd, void *opts)
+{
+	int mode = true;
+
+	return setsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, &mode, sizeof(mode));
+}
+
+static int v6only_false(int fd, void *opts)
+{
+	int mode = false;
+
+	return setsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, &mode, sizeof(mode));
+}
+
+static void run_test(struct test_btf_skc_cls_ingress *skel, bool gen_cookies,
+		     int ip_mode)
 {
 	const char *tcp_syncookies = gen_cookies ? "2" : "1";
 	int listen_fd = -1, cli_fd = -1, srv_fd = -1, err;
+	struct network_helper_opts opts = { 0 };
+	struct sockaddr_storage *addr;
 	struct sockaddr_in6 srv_sa6;
-	socklen_t addrlen = sizeof(srv_sa6);
+	struct sockaddr_in srv_sa4;
+	socklen_t addr_len;
+	int sock_family;
+	char *srv_addr;
 	int srv_port;
 
+	switch (ip_mode) {
+	case TEST_MODE_IPV4:
+		sock_family = AF_INET;
+		srv_addr = SERVER_ADDR_IPV4;
+		addr = (struct sockaddr_storage *)&srv_sa4;
+		addr_len = sizeof(srv_sa4);
+		break;
+	case TEST_MODE_IPV6:
+		opts.post_socket_cb = v6only_true;
+		sock_family = AF_INET6;
+		srv_addr = SERVER_ADDR_IPV6;
+		addr = (struct sockaddr_storage *)&srv_sa6;
+		addr_len = sizeof(srv_sa6);
+		break;
+	case TEST_MODE_DUAL:
+		opts.post_socket_cb = v6only_false;
+		sock_family = AF_INET6;
+		srv_addr = SERVER_ADDR_DUAL;
+		addr = (struct sockaddr_storage *)&srv_sa6;
+		addr_len = sizeof(srv_sa6);
+		break;
+	default:
+			break;
+	}
+
 	if (write_sysctl("/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies", tcp_syncookies))
 		return;
 
-	listen_fd = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, "::1", 0, 0);
+	listen_fd = start_server_str(sock_family, SOCK_STREAM, srv_addr,  0,
+				     &opts);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(listen_fd, "start server"))
 		return;
 
-	err = getsockname(listen_fd, (struct sockaddr *)&srv_sa6, &addrlen);
+	err = getsockname(listen_fd, (struct sockaddr *)addr, &addr_len);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "getsockname(listen_fd)"))
 		goto done;
-	memcpy(&skel->bss->srv_sa6, &srv_sa6, sizeof(srv_sa6));
-	srv_port = ntohs(srv_sa6.sin6_port);
+
+	switch (ip_mode) {
+	case TEST_MODE_IPV4:
+		memcpy(&skel->bss->srv_sa4, &srv_sa4, sizeof(srv_sa4));
+		srv_port = ntohs(srv_sa4.sin_port);
+		break;
+	case TEST_MODE_IPV6:
+	case TEST_MODE_DUAL:
+		memcpy(&skel->bss->srv_sa6, &srv_sa6, sizeof(srv_sa6));
+		srv_port = ntohs(srv_sa6.sin6_port);
+		break;
+	default:
+			break;
+	}
 
 	cli_fd = connect_to_fd(listen_fd, 0);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(cli_fd, "connect client"))
@@ -127,14 +195,34 @@  static void run_test(struct test_btf_skc_cls_ingress *skel, bool gen_cookies)
 		close(srv_fd);
 }
 
-static void test_conn(struct test_btf_skc_cls_ingress *skel)
+static void test_conn_ipv4(struct test_btf_skc_cls_ingress *skel)
+{
+	run_test(skel, false, TEST_MODE_IPV4);
+}
+
+static void test_conn_ipv6(struct test_btf_skc_cls_ingress *skel)
+{
+	run_test(skel, false, TEST_MODE_IPV6);
+}
+
+static void test_conn_dual(struct test_btf_skc_cls_ingress *skel)
+{
+	run_test(skel, false, TEST_MODE_DUAL);
+}
+
+static void test_syncookie_ipv4(struct test_btf_skc_cls_ingress *skel)
+{
+	run_test(skel, true, TEST_MODE_IPV4);
+}
+
+static void test_syncookie_ipv6(struct test_btf_skc_cls_ingress *skel)
 {
-	run_test(skel, false);
+	run_test(skel, true, TEST_MODE_IPV6);
 }
 
-static void test_syncookie(struct test_btf_skc_cls_ingress *skel)
+static void test_syncookie_dual(struct test_btf_skc_cls_ingress *skel)
 {
-	run_test(skel, true);
+	run_test(skel, true, TEST_MODE_DUAL);
 }
 
 struct test {
@@ -144,8 +232,12 @@  struct test {
 
 #define DEF_TEST(name) { #name, test_##name }
 static struct test tests[] = {
-	DEF_TEST(conn),
-	DEF_TEST(syncookie),
+	DEF_TEST(conn_ipv4),
+	DEF_TEST(conn_ipv6),
+	DEF_TEST(conn_dual),
+	DEF_TEST(syncookie_ipv4),
+	DEF_TEST(syncookie_ipv6),
+	DEF_TEST(syncookie_dual),
 };
 
 void test_btf_skc_cls_ingress(void)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_btf_skc_cls_ingress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_btf_skc_cls_ingress.c
index f0759efff6ef15d2663927400dd064c53b020f78..cd528f8792ff2eb14683cbc13e8b0f3fd38329e9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_btf_skc_cls_ingress.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_btf_skc_cls_ingress.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ 
 #endif
 
 struct sockaddr_in6 srv_sa6 = {};
+struct sockaddr_in srv_sa4 = {};
 __u16 listen_tp_sport = 0;
 __u16 req_sk_sport = 0;
 __u32 recv_cookie = 0;
@@ -18,8 +19,8 @@  __u32 linum = 0;
 
 #define LOG() ({ if (!linum) linum = __LINE__; })
 
-static void test_syncookie_helper(struct ipv6hdr *ip6h, struct tcphdr *th,
-				  struct tcp_sock *tp,
+static void test_syncookie_helper(void *iphdr, int iphdr_size,
+				  struct tcphdr *th, struct tcp_sock *tp,
 				  struct __sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	if (th->syn) {
@@ -38,7 +39,7 @@  static void test_syncookie_helper(struct ipv6hdr *ip6h, struct tcphdr *th,
 			return;
 		}
 
-		mss_cookie = bpf_tcp_gen_syncookie(tp, ip6h, sizeof(*ip6h),
+		mss_cookie = bpf_tcp_gen_syncookie(tp, iphdr, iphdr_size,
 						   th, 40);
 		if (mss_cookie < 0) {
 			if (mss_cookie != -ENOENT)
@@ -48,7 +49,7 @@  static void test_syncookie_helper(struct ipv6hdr *ip6h, struct tcphdr *th,
 		}
 	} else if (gen_cookie) {
 		/* It was in cookie mode */
-		int ret = bpf_tcp_check_syncookie(tp, ip6h, sizeof(*ip6h),
+		int ret = bpf_tcp_check_syncookie(tp, iphdr, iphdr_size,
 						  th, sizeof(*th));
 
 		if (ret < 0) {
@@ -60,26 +61,63 @@  static void test_syncookie_helper(struct ipv6hdr *ip6h, struct tcphdr *th,
 	}
 }
 
-static int handle_ip6_tcp(struct ipv6hdr *ip6h, struct __sk_buff *skb)
+static int handle_ip_tcp(struct ethhdr *eth, struct __sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	struct bpf_sock_tuple *tuple;
+	struct bpf_sock_tuple *tuple = NULL;
+	unsigned int tuple_len = 0;
 	struct bpf_sock *bpf_skc;
-	unsigned int tuple_len;
+	struct ipv6hdr *ip6h;
+	void *iphdr = NULL;
+	int iphdr_size = 0;
+	struct iphdr *ip4h;
 	struct tcphdr *th;
 	void *data_end;
 
 	data_end = (void *)(long)(skb->data_end);
 
-	th = (struct tcphdr *)(ip6h + 1);
-	if (th + 1 > data_end)
-		return TC_ACT_OK;
+	switch (eth->h_proto) {
+	case bpf_htons(ETH_P_IP):
+		ip4h = (struct iphdr *)(eth + 1);
+		if (ip4h + 1 > data_end)
+			return TC_ACT_OK;
+		if (ip4h->protocol != IPPROTO_TCP)
+			return TC_ACT_OK;
+		th = (struct tcphdr *)(ip4h + 1);
+		if (th + 1 > data_end)
+			return TC_ACT_OK;
+		/* Is it the testing traffic? */
+		if (th->dest != srv_sa4.sin_port)
+			return TC_ACT_OK;
+		tuple_len = sizeof(tuple->ipv4);
+		tuple = (struct bpf_sock_tuple *)&ip4h->saddr;
+		iphdr = ip4h;
+		iphdr_size = sizeof(*ip4h);
+		break;
+	case bpf_htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
+		ip6h = (struct ipv6hdr *)(eth + 1);
+		if (ip6h + 1 > data_end)
+			return TC_ACT_OK;
+		if (ip6h->nexthdr != IPPROTO_TCP)
+			return TC_ACT_OK;
+		th = (struct tcphdr *)(ip6h + 1);
+		if (th + 1 > data_end)
+			return TC_ACT_OK;
+		/* Is it the testing traffic? */
+		if (th->dest != srv_sa6.sin6_port)
+			return TC_ACT_OK;
+		tuple_len = sizeof(tuple->ipv6);
+		tuple = (struct bpf_sock_tuple *)&ip6h->saddr;
+		iphdr = ip6h;
+		iphdr_size = sizeof(*ip6h);
+		break;
+	default:
+			return TC_ACT_OK;
+	}
 
-	/* Is it the testing traffic? */
-	if (th->dest != srv_sa6.sin6_port)
+	if (!tuple) {
+		LOG();
 		return TC_ACT_OK;
-
-	tuple_len = sizeof(tuple->ipv6);
-	tuple = (struct bpf_sock_tuple *)&ip6h->saddr;
+	}
 	if ((void *)tuple + tuple_len > data_end) {
 		LOG();
 		return TC_ACT_OK;
@@ -126,7 +164,7 @@  static int handle_ip6_tcp(struct ipv6hdr *ip6h, struct __sk_buff *skb)
 
 		listen_tp_sport = tp->inet_conn.icsk_inet.sk.__sk_common.skc_num;
 
-		test_syncookie_helper(ip6h, th, tp, skb);
+		test_syncookie_helper(iphdr, iphdr_size, th, tp, skb);
 		bpf_sk_release(tp);
 		return TC_ACT_OK;
 	}
@@ -142,7 +180,6 @@  static int handle_ip6_tcp(struct ipv6hdr *ip6h, struct __sk_buff *skb)
 SEC("tc")
 int cls_ingress(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	struct ipv6hdr *ip6h;
 	struct ethhdr *eth;
 	void *data_end;
 
@@ -152,15 +189,11 @@  int cls_ingress(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 	if (eth + 1 > data_end)
 		return TC_ACT_OK;
 
-	if (eth->h_proto != bpf_htons(ETH_P_IPV6))
-		return TC_ACT_OK;
-
-	ip6h = (struct ipv6hdr *)(eth + 1);
-	if (ip6h + 1 > data_end)
+	if (eth->h_proto != bpf_htons(ETH_P_IP) &&
+	    eth->h_proto != bpf_htons(ETH_P_IPV6))
 		return TC_ACT_OK;
 
-	if (ip6h->nexthdr == IPPROTO_TCP)
-		return handle_ip6_tcp(ip6h, skb);
+	return handle_ip_tcp(eth, skb);
 
 	return TC_ACT_OK;
 }