diff mbox series

[v2,bpf-next,1/2] bpf: Add open coded version of kmem_cache iterator

Message ID 20241024074815.1255066-1-namhyung@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State New
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [v2,bpf-next,1/2] bpf: Add open coded version of kmem_cache iterator | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 6 this patch: 6
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 13 of 13 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 6 this patch: 6
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn fail Errors and warnings before: 60 this patch: 63
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!s" WARNING: Prefer __aligned(8) over __attribute__((aligned(8))) WARNING: line length of 87 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 11 this patch: 11
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Namhyung Kim Oct. 24, 2024, 7:48 a.m. UTC
Add a new open coded iterator for kmem_cache which can be called from a
BPF program like below.  It doesn't take any argument and traverses all
kmem_cache entries.

  struct kmem_cache *pos;

  bpf_for_each(kmem_cache, pos) {
      ...
  }

As it needs to grab slab_mutex, it should be called from sleepable BPF
programs only.

Also update the existing iterator code to use the open coded version
internally as suggested by Andrii.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
v2)
 * prevent restart after the last element  (Martin)
 * update existing code to use the open coded version (Andrii)

 kernel/bpf/helpers.c         |   3 +
 kernel/bpf/kmem_cache_iter.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index 5c3fdb29c1b1fe53..ddddb060835bac4b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -3112,6 +3112,9 @@  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_bits_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_bits_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_copy_from_user_str, KF_SLEEPABLE)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_get_kmem_cache)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_kmem_cache_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_SLEEPABLE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_kmem_cache_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL | KF_SLEEPABLE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_kmem_cache_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY | KF_SLEEPABLE)
 BTF_KFUNCS_END(common_btf_ids)
 
 static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set common_kfunc_set = {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/kmem_cache_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/kmem_cache_iter.c
index ebc101d7da51b57c..3ae2158d767f4526 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/kmem_cache_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/kmem_cache_iter.c
@@ -8,16 +8,116 @@ 
 
 #include "../../mm/slab.h" /* kmem_cache, slab_caches and slab_mutex */
 
+/* open-coded version */
+struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache {
+	__u64 __opaque[1];
+} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
+
+struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache_kern {
+	struct kmem_cache *pos;
+} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
+
+#define KMEM_CACHE_POS_START  ((void *)1L)
+
+__bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_kmem_cache_new(struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache *it)
+{
+	struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache_kern *kit = (void *)it;
+
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*kit) > sizeof(*it));
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(*kit) != __alignof__(*it));
+
+	kit->pos = KMEM_CACHE_POS_START;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc struct kmem_cache *bpf_iter_kmem_cache_next(struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache *it)
+{
+	struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache_kern *kit = (void *)it;
+	struct kmem_cache *prev = kit->pos;
+	struct kmem_cache *next;
+	bool destroy = false;
+
+	if (!prev)
+		return NULL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
+
+	if (list_empty(&slab_caches)) {
+		mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	if (prev == KMEM_CACHE_POS_START)
+		next = list_first_entry(&slab_caches, struct kmem_cache, list);
+	else if (list_last_entry(&slab_caches, struct kmem_cache, list) == prev)
+		next = NULL;
+	else
+		next = list_next_entry(prev, list);
+
+	/* boot_caches have negative refcount, don't touch them */
+	if (next && next->refcount > 0)
+		next->refcount++;
+
+	/* Skip kmem_cache_destroy() for active entries */
+	if (prev && prev != KMEM_CACHE_POS_START) {
+		if (prev->refcount > 1)
+			prev->refcount--;
+		else if (prev->refcount == 1)
+			destroy = true;
+	}
+
+	mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
+
+	if (destroy)
+		kmem_cache_destroy(prev);
+
+	kit->pos = next;
+	return next;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_kmem_cache_destroy(struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache *it)
+{
+	struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache_kern *kit = (void *)it;
+	struct kmem_cache *s = kit->pos;
+	bool destroy = false;
+
+	if (s == NULL || s == KMEM_CACHE_POS_START)
+		return;
+
+	mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
+
+	/* Skip kmem_cache_destroy() for active entries */
+	if (s->refcount > 1)
+		s->refcount--;
+	else if (s->refcount == 1)
+		destroy = true;
+
+	mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
+
+	if (destroy)
+		kmem_cache_destroy(s);
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
+
 struct bpf_iter__kmem_cache {
 	__bpf_md_ptr(struct bpf_iter_meta *, meta);
 	__bpf_md_ptr(struct kmem_cache *, s);
 };
 
+union kmem_cache_iter_priv {
+	struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache it;
+	struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache_kern kit;
+};
+
 static void *kmem_cache_iter_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
 {
 	loff_t cnt = 0;
 	bool found = false;
 	struct kmem_cache *s;
+	union kmem_cache_iter_priv *p = seq->private;
 
 	mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
 
@@ -43,8 +143,9 @@  static void *kmem_cache_iter_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
 	mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
 
 	if (!found)
-		return NULL;
+		s = NULL;
 
+	p->kit.pos = s;
 	return s;
 }
 
@@ -55,63 +156,24 @@  static void kmem_cache_iter_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 		.meta = &meta,
 		.s = v,
 	};
+	union kmem_cache_iter_priv *p = seq->private;
 	struct bpf_prog *prog;
-	bool destroy = false;
 
 	meta.seq = seq;
 	prog = bpf_iter_get_info(&meta, true);
 	if (prog && !ctx.s)
 		bpf_iter_run_prog(prog, &ctx);
 
-	if (ctx.s == NULL)
-		return;
-
-	mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
-
-	/* Skip kmem_cache_destroy() for active entries */
-	if (ctx.s->refcount > 1)
-		ctx.s->refcount--;
-	else if (ctx.s->refcount == 1)
-		destroy = true;
-
-	mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
-
-	if (destroy)
-		kmem_cache_destroy(ctx.s);
+	bpf_iter_kmem_cache_destroy(&p->it);
 }
 
 static void *kmem_cache_iter_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 {
-	struct kmem_cache *s = v;
-	struct kmem_cache *next = NULL;
-	bool destroy = false;
+	union kmem_cache_iter_priv *p = seq->private;
 
 	++*pos;
 
-	mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
-
-	if (list_last_entry(&slab_caches, struct kmem_cache, list) != s) {
-		next = list_next_entry(s, list);
-
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(next->refcount == 0);
-
-		/* boot_caches have negative refcount, don't touch them */
-		if (next->refcount > 0)
-			next->refcount++;
-	}
-
-	/* Skip kmem_cache_destroy() for active entries */
-	if (s->refcount > 1)
-		s->refcount--;
-	else if (s->refcount == 1)
-		destroy = true;
-
-	mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
-
-	if (destroy)
-		kmem_cache_destroy(s);
-
-	return next;
+	return bpf_iter_kmem_cache_next(&p->it);
 }
 
 static int kmem_cache_iter_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
@@ -143,6 +205,7 @@  BTF_ID_LIST_GLOBAL_SINGLE(bpf_kmem_cache_btf_id, struct, kmem_cache)
 
 static const struct bpf_iter_seq_info kmem_cache_iter_seq_info = {
 	.seq_ops		= &kmem_cache_iter_seq_ops,
+	.seq_priv_size		= sizeof(union kmem_cache_iter_priv),
 };
 
 static void bpf_iter_kmem_cache_show_fdinfo(const struct bpf_iter_aux_info *aux,