diff mbox series

[v2,bpf-next/net,4/8] selftests/bpf: Add push/pop checking for msg_verify_data in test_sockmap

Message ID 20241024201306.3429177-5-zijianzhang@bytedance.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Fixes to bpf_msg_push/pop_data and test_sockmap | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net
netdev/apply fail Patch does not apply to net-0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-net-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-net-VM_Test-12 pending Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-net-VM_Test-13 pending Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-net-VM_Test-14 pending Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-net-VM_Test-6 pending Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-net-VM_Test-9 pending Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-net-VM_Test-10 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-net-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-net-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-net-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-net-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-net-VM_Test-11 pending Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-net-VM_Test-4 pending Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-net-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-net-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-net-VM_Test-7 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release

Commit Message

Zijian Zhang Oct. 24, 2024, 8:13 p.m. UTC 
From: Zijian Zhang <zijianzhang@bytedance.com>

Add push/pop checking for msg_verify_data in test_sockmap, except for
pop/push with cork tests, in these tests the logic will be different.
1. With corking, pop/push might not be invoked in each sendmsg, it makes
the layout of the received data difficult
2. It makes it hard to calculate the total_bytes in the recvmsg
Temporarily skip the data integrity test for these cases now, added a TODO

Fixes: ee9b352ce465 ("selftests/bpf: Fix msg_verify_data in test_sockmap")
Signed-off-by: Zijian Zhang <zijianzhang@bytedance.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
index 5f4558f1f004..61a747afcd05 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
@@ -88,6 +88,10 @@  int ktls;
 int peek_flag;
 int skb_use_parser;
 int txmsg_omit_skb_parser;
+int verify_push_start;
+int verify_push_len;
+int verify_pop_start;
+int verify_pop_len;
 
 static const struct option long_options[] = {
 	{"help",	no_argument,		NULL, 'h' },
@@ -514,12 +518,41 @@  static int msg_alloc_iov(struct msghdr *msg,
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
 
-/* TODO: Add verification logic for push, pull and pop data */
+/* In push or pop test, we need to do some calculations for msg_verify_data */
+static void msg_verify_date_prep(void)
+{
+	int push_range_end = txmsg_start_push + txmsg_end_push - 1;
+	int pop_range_end = txmsg_start_pop + txmsg_pop - 1;
+
+	if (txmsg_end_push && txmsg_pop &&
+	    txmsg_start_push <= pop_range_end && txmsg_start_pop <= push_range_end) {
+		/* The push range and the pop range overlap */
+		int overlap_len;
+
+		verify_push_start = txmsg_start_push;
+		verify_pop_start = txmsg_start_pop;
+		if (txmsg_start_push < txmsg_start_pop)
+			overlap_len = min(push_range_end - txmsg_start_pop + 1, txmsg_pop);
+		else
+			overlap_len = min(pop_range_end - txmsg_start_push + 1, txmsg_end_push);
+		verify_push_len = max(txmsg_end_push - overlap_len, 0);
+		verify_pop_len = max(txmsg_pop - overlap_len, 0);
+	} else {
+		/* Otherwise */
+		verify_push_start = txmsg_start_push;
+		verify_pop_start = txmsg_start_pop;
+		verify_push_len = txmsg_end_push;
+		verify_pop_len = txmsg_pop;
+	}
+}
+
 static int msg_verify_data(struct msghdr *msg, int size, int chunk_sz,
-				 unsigned char *k_p, int *bytes_cnt_p)
+			   unsigned char *k_p, int *bytes_cnt_p,
+			   int *check_cnt_p, int *push_p)
 {
-	int i, j, bytes_cnt = *bytes_cnt_p;
+	int bytes_cnt = *bytes_cnt_p, check_cnt = *check_cnt_p, push = *push_p;
 	unsigned char k = *k_p;
+	int i, j;
 
 	for (i = 0, j = 0; i < msg->msg_iovlen && size; i++, j = 0) {
 		unsigned char *d = msg->msg_iov[i].iov_base;
@@ -538,6 +571,37 @@  static int msg_verify_data(struct msghdr *msg, int size, int chunk_sz,
 		}
 
 		for (; j < msg->msg_iov[i].iov_len && size; j++) {
+			if (push > 0 &&
+			    check_cnt == verify_push_start + verify_push_len - push) {
+				int skipped;
+revisit_push:
+				skipped = push;
+				if (j + push >= msg->msg_iov[i].iov_len)
+					skipped = msg->msg_iov[i].iov_len - j;
+				push -= skipped;
+				size -= skipped;
+				j += skipped - 1;
+				check_cnt += skipped;
+				continue;
+			}
+
+			if (verify_pop_len > 0 && check_cnt == verify_pop_start) {
+				bytes_cnt += verify_pop_len;
+				check_cnt += verify_pop_len;
+				k += verify_pop_len;
+
+				if (bytes_cnt == chunk_sz) {
+					k = 0;
+					bytes_cnt = 0;
+					check_cnt = 0;
+					push = verify_push_len;
+				}
+
+				if (push > 0 &&
+				    check_cnt == verify_push_start + verify_push_len - push)
+					goto revisit_push;
+			}
+
 			if (d[j] != k++) {
 				fprintf(stderr,
 					"detected data corruption @iov[%i]:%i %02x != %02x, %02x ?= %02x\n",
@@ -545,15 +609,20 @@  static int msg_verify_data(struct msghdr *msg, int size, int chunk_sz,
 				return -EDATAINTEGRITY;
 			}
 			bytes_cnt++;
+			check_cnt++;
 			if (bytes_cnt == chunk_sz) {
 				k = 0;
 				bytes_cnt = 0;
+				check_cnt = 0;
+				push = verify_push_len;
 			}
 			size--;
 		}
 	}
 	*k_p = k;
 	*bytes_cnt_p = bytes_cnt;
+	*check_cnt_p = check_cnt;
+	*push_p = push;
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -612,6 +681,8 @@  static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
 		struct timeval timeout;
 		unsigned char k = 0;
 		int bytes_cnt = 0;
+		int check_cnt = 0;
+		int push = 0;
 		fd_set w;
 
 		fcntl(fd, fd_flags);
@@ -637,6 +708,10 @@  static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
 		}
 		total_bytes += txmsg_push_total;
 		total_bytes -= txmsg_pop_total;
+		if (data) {
+			msg_verify_date_prep();
+			push = verify_push_len;
+		}
 		err = clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &s->start);
 		if (err < 0)
 			perror("recv start time");
@@ -712,7 +787,8 @@  static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
 						iov_length :
 						iov_length * iov_count;
 
-				errno = msg_verify_data(&msg, recv, chunk_sz, &k, &bytes_cnt);
+				errno = msg_verify_data(&msg, recv, chunk_sz, &k, &bytes_cnt,
+							&check_cnt, &push);
 				if (errno) {
 					perror("data verify msg failed");
 					goto out_errno;
@@ -722,7 +798,9 @@  static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
 								recvp,
 								chunk_sz,
 								&k,
-								&bytes_cnt);
+								&bytes_cnt,
+								&check_cnt,
+								&push);
 					if (errno) {
 						perror("data verify msg_peek failed");
 						goto out_errno;
@@ -1636,6 +1714,8 @@  static void test_txmsg_pull(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt)
 
 static void test_txmsg_pop(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt)
 {
+	bool data = opt->data_test;
+
 	/* Test basic pop */
 	txmsg_pass = 1;
 	txmsg_start_pop = 1;
@@ -1654,6 +1734,12 @@  static void test_txmsg_pop(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt)
 	txmsg_pop = 2;
 	test_send_many(opt, cgrp);
 
+	/* TODO: Test for pop + cork should be different,
+	 * - It makes the layout of the received data difficult
+	 * - It makes it hard to calculate the total_bytes in the recvmsg
+	 * Temporarily skip the data integrity test for this case now.
+	 */
+	opt->data_test = false;
 	/* Test pop + cork */
 	txmsg_redir = 0;
 	txmsg_cork = 512;
@@ -1667,10 +1753,13 @@  static void test_txmsg_pop(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt)
 	txmsg_start_pop = 1;
 	txmsg_pop = 2;
 	test_send_many(opt, cgrp);
+	opt->data_test = data;
 }
 
 static void test_txmsg_push(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt)
 {
+	bool data = opt->data_test;
+
 	/* Test basic push */
 	txmsg_pass = 1;
 	txmsg_start_push = 1;
@@ -1689,12 +1778,19 @@  static void test_txmsg_push(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt)
 	txmsg_end_push = 2;
 	test_send_many(opt, cgrp);
 
+	/* TODO: Test for push + cork should be different,
+	 * - It makes the layout of the received data difficult
+	 * - It makes it hard to calculate the total_bytes in the recvmsg
+	 * Temporarily skip the data integrity test for this case now.
+	 */
+	opt->data_test = false;
 	/* Test push + cork */
 	txmsg_redir = 0;
 	txmsg_cork = 512;
 	txmsg_start_push = 1;
 	txmsg_end_push = 2;
 	test_send_many(opt, cgrp);
+	opt->data_test = data;
 }
 
 static void test_txmsg_push_pop(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt)