diff mbox series

include: btf: Guard inline function with CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL

Message ID 20241104060300.421403-1-alistair.francis@wdc.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 9a783139614fb837da4ccb2f8ec6f0ddc802b3d3
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series include: btf: Guard inline function with CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Not a local patch
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release

Commit Message

Alistair Francis Nov. 4, 2024, 6:03 a.m. UTC 
The static inline btf_type_is_struct_ptr() function calls
btf_type_skip_modifiers() which is guarded by CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL.
btf_type_is_struct_ptr() is also only called by CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
ifdef code, so let's only expose btf_type_is_struct_ptr() if
CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL is defined.

Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
---
 include/linux/btf.h | 21 ++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Nov. 4, 2024, 6:20 p.m. UTC | #1 
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Mon,  4 Nov 2024 16:03:00 +1000 you wrote:
> The static inline btf_type_is_struct_ptr() function calls
> btf_type_skip_modifiers() which is guarded by CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL.
> btf_type_is_struct_ptr() is also only called by CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> ifdef code, so let's only expose btf_type_is_struct_ptr() if
> CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL is defined.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - include: btf: Guard inline function with CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/9a783139614f

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/btf.h b/include/linux/btf.h
index b8a583194c4a9..66a816ba4f5d0 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf.h
@@ -581,6 +581,16 @@  int get_kern_ctx_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, enum bpf_prog_type prog_ty
 bool btf_types_are_same(const struct btf *btf1, u32 id1,
 			const struct btf *btf2, u32 id2);
 int btf_check_iter_arg(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *func, int arg_idx);
+
+static inline bool btf_type_is_struct_ptr(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t)
+{
+	if (!btf_type_is_ptr(t))
+		return false;
+
+	t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, t->type, NULL);
+
+	return btf_type_is_struct(t);
+}
 #else
 static inline const struct btf_type *btf_type_by_id(const struct btf *btf,
 						    u32 type_id)
@@ -660,15 +670,4 @@  static inline int btf_check_iter_arg(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *fun
 	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 }
 #endif
-
-static inline bool btf_type_is_struct_ptr(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t)
-{
-	if (!btf_type_is_ptr(t))
-		return false;
-
-	t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, t->type, NULL);
-
-	return btf_type_is_struct(t);
-}
-
 #endif