Context |
Check |
Description |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR |
success
|
PR summary
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 |
success
|
Logs for ShellCheck
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 |
success
|
Logs for Unittests
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 |
success
|
Logs for Validate matrix.py
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 |
success
|
Logs for Lint
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
|
netdev/series_format |
success
|
Posting correctly formatted
|
netdev/tree_selection |
success
|
Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
|
netdev/ynl |
success
|
Generated files up to date;
no warnings/errors;
no diff in generated;
|
netdev/fixes_present |
success
|
Fixes tag not required for -next series
|
netdev/header_inline |
success
|
No static functions without inline keyword in header files
|
netdev/build_32bit |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 5 this patch: 5
|
netdev/build_tools |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 0 (+0) this patch: 0 (+0)
|
netdev/cc_maintainers |
warning
|
8 maintainers not CCed: kpsingh@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev eddyz87@gmail.com shuah@kernel.org linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org song@kernel.org mykolal@fb.com yonghong.song@linux.dev
|
netdev/build_clang |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
|
netdev/verify_signedoff |
success
|
Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
|
netdev/deprecated_api |
success
|
None detected
|
netdev/check_selftest |
success
|
No net selftest shell script
|
netdev/verify_fixes |
success
|
No Fixes tag
|
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
|
netdev/checkpatch |
fail
|
CHECK: No space is necessary after a cast
CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
WARNING: Prefer __section("consumers") over __attribute__((section("consumers")))
WARNING: line length of 81 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 84 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 89 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 92 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 97 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: macros should not use a trailing semicolon
WARNING: please, no space before tabs
|
netdev/build_clang_rust |
success
|
No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
|
netdev/kdoc |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
|
netdev/source_inline |
success
|
Was 0 now: 0
|
@@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ get_link(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int link)
}
}
-static int uprobe_attach(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int idx)
+static int uprobe_attach(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int idx, unsigned long offset)
{
struct bpf_program *prog = get_program(skel, idx);
struct bpf_link **link = get_link(skel, idx);
@@ -798,6 +798,9 @@ static int uprobe_attach(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int idx)
if (!prog || !link)
return -1;
+ opts.offsets = &offset;
+ opts.cnt = 1;
+
/*
* bit/prog: 0 uprobe entry
* bit/prog: 1 uprobe return
@@ -807,9 +810,7 @@ static int uprobe_attach(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int idx)
opts.retprobe = idx == 1;
opts.session = idx == 2 || idx == 3;
- *link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(prog, 0, "/proc/self/exe",
- "uprobe_consumer_test",
- &opts);
+ *link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(prog, 0, "/proc/self/exe", NULL, &opts);
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(*link, "bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi"))
return -1;
return 0;
@@ -830,7 +831,8 @@ static bool test_bit(int bit, unsigned long val)
noinline int
uprobe_consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel,
- unsigned long before, unsigned long after)
+ unsigned long before, unsigned long after,
+ unsigned long offset)
{
int idx;
@@ -843,15 +845,43 @@ uprobe_consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel,
/* ... and attach all new programs in 'after' state */
for (idx = 0; idx < 4; idx++) {
if (!test_bit(idx, before) && test_bit(idx, after)) {
- if (!ASSERT_OK(uprobe_attach(skel, idx), "uprobe_attach_after"))
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(uprobe_attach(skel, idx, offset), "uprobe_attach_after"))
return -1;
}
}
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * We generate 16 consumer_testX functions that will have uprobe installed on
+ * and will be called in separate threads. All function pointer are stored in
+ * "consumers" section and each thread will pick one function based on index.
+ */
+
+extern const void *__start_consumers;
+
+#define __CONSUMER_TEST(func) \
+noinline int func(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, unsigned long before, \
+ unsigned long after, unsigned long offset) \
+{ \
+ return uprobe_consumer_test(skel, before, after, offset); \
+} \
+void *__ ## func __used __attribute__((section("consumers"))) = (void *) func;
+
+#define CONSUMER_TEST(func) __CONSUMER_TEST(func)
+
+#define C1 CONSUMER_TEST(__PASTE(consumer_test, __COUNTER__))
+#define C4 C1 C1 C1 C1
+#define C16 C4 C4 C4 C4
+
+C16
+
+typedef int (*test_t)(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *, unsigned long,
+ unsigned long, unsigned long);
+
static int consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel,
- unsigned long before, unsigned long after)
+ unsigned long before, unsigned long after,
+ test_t test, unsigned long offset)
{
int err, idx, ret = -1;
@@ -860,12 +890,12 @@ static int consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel,
/* 'before' is each, we attach uprobe for every set idx */
for (idx = 0; idx < 4; idx++) {
if (test_bit(idx, before)) {
- if (!ASSERT_OK(uprobe_attach(skel, idx), "uprobe_attach_before"))
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(uprobe_attach(skel, idx, offset), "uprobe_attach_before"))
goto cleanup;
}
}
- err = uprobe_consumer_test(skel, before, after);
+ err = test(skel, before, after, offset);
if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "uprobe_consumer_test"))
goto cleanup;
@@ -934,14 +964,46 @@ static int consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel,
return ret;
}
-static void test_consumers(void)
+#define CONSUMER_MAX 16
+
+/*
+ * Each thread runs 1/16 of the load by running test for single
+ * 'before' number (based on thread index) and full scale of
+ * 'after' numbers.
+ */
+static void *consumer_thread(void *arg)
{
+ unsigned long idx = (unsigned long) arg;
struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel;
- int before, after;
+ unsigned long offset;
+ const void *func;
+ int after;
skel = uprobe_multi_consumers__open_and_load();
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "uprobe_multi_consumers__open_and_load"))
- return;
+ return NULL;
+
+ func = *((&__start_consumers) + idx);
+
+ offset = get_uprobe_offset(func);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(offset, 0, "uprobe_offset"))
+ goto out;
+
+ for (after = 0; after < CONSUMER_MAX; after++)
+ if (consumer_test(skel, idx, after, func, offset))
+ goto out;
+
+out:
+ uprobe_multi_consumers__destroy(skel);
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+
+static void test_consumers(void)
+{
+ pthread_t pt[CONSUMER_MAX];
+ unsigned long idx;
+ int err;
/*
* The idea of this test is to try all possible combinations of
@@ -982,14 +1044,14 @@ static void test_consumers(void)
* before/after bits.
*/
- for (before = 0; before < 16; before++) {
- for (after = 0; after < 16; after++)
- if (consumer_test(skel, before, after))
- goto out;
+ for (idx = 0; idx < CONSUMER_MAX; idx++) {
+ err = pthread_create(&pt[idx], NULL, consumer_thread, (void *) idx);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "pthread_create"))
+ break;
}
-out:
- uprobe_multi_consumers__destroy(skel);
+ while (idx)
+ pthread_join(pt[--idx], NULL);
}
static struct bpf_program *uprobe_multi_program(struct uprobe_multi_pid_filter *skel, int idx)