From patchwork Thu Nov 14 21:50:33 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Alexis_Lothor=C3=A9_=28eBPF_Foundation=29?= X-Patchwork-Id: 13875655 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (relay7-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53B281AC444; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 21:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.200 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731621078; cv=none; b=T/GP0n1NOD5MWU8K08C8HhCFuH8ICWtI8nUSrSi+i2Ph62kQaNCQSUGmEcLhNBW0WdRr2fBNZoNpVyJ5X0WQircUwRigYmL9VS/rr4CwtwVlh8wz2HMy+2OHJcOiKfUk/QeWy8Ss7pBqIoTYpDM92UKmiVseGRo5+CC1LG+cz3o= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731621078; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7LQ3sRe9KPRrDSt0aVts+fljiqnBKcRZiqxa48tBwao=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=g2mDmQl/w6QZH/vyBAEdwVpNSBAjWcZtJvz7c0QkeM/5HjODcCv1yTm+nYc/GFby2YiyFFrF9eBp9c+Zhb83fD3nWOcMFyC5P4smiRZzL1L0xhDnpmz2V3xeGepbFEBZuA011Zd6LMcceTfFeRnCZTexaAin5LkcH8G6ntut9iY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=n5/KWV2b; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.200 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="n5/KWV2b" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D451820002; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 21:51:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1731621073; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OzgpZJtL6AQIpjzJhII2aKq1H2YQh+tDQ/EbQV9eSSM=; b=n5/KWV2b7eOyoMr+GCwuxIiqbJZdRt8jhyMJHtxED6McgtO5f9t7GAok16OPQzstB+9cBc dO7xPbgbW+DJq79p2jHwVi47y3nC3V4K3sNR6lJnnHiWXg5qHXK2WI5e20y1K3rQlOmxDI /d8MKVGshns0KWSktxNBYA1eQhVXd1uHaIaMFMYO7FW99k3ncvBkodnMz7v4MxGUkwJKXx d6d82m+NNoR5wAKF3tJ/Ob8p7eei3141Zl7NzIQdyHjwxP+7vlJDLOQ8SXzvTIMRqTg4Tm w5VJRAPrMVNRm18wg8fFWzSUnpH1izA4FYNznAZnYxqUZgCsCPW2pNCigkj9Wg== From: =?utf-8?q?Alexis_Lothor=C3=A9_=28eBPF_Foundation=29?= Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 22:50:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/13] selftests/bpf: use ASSERT_MEMEQ to compare bpf flow keys Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20241114-flow_dissector-v2-2-ee4a3be3de65@bootlin.com> References: <20241114-flow_dissector-v2-0-ee4a3be3de65@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: <20241114-flow_dissector-v2-0-ee4a3be3de65@bootlin.com> To: Andrii Nakryiko , Eduard Zingerman , Mykola Lysenko , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Shuah Khan , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Jesper Dangaard Brouer Cc: ebpf@linuxfoundation.org, Thomas Petazzoni , Bastien Curutchet , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?q?Alexis_Lothor=C3=A9_=28eBPF_Foundation?= =?utf-8?q?=29?= X-Mailer: b4 0.14.2 X-GND-Sasl: alexis.lothore@bootlin.com X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net The flow_dissector program currently compares flow keys returned by bpf program with the expected one thanks to a custom macro using memcmp. Use the new ASSERT_MEMEQ macro to perform this comparision. This update also allows to get rid of the unused bpf_test_run_opts variable in run_tests_skb_less (it was only used by the CHECK macro for its duration field) Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) --- Changes in v2: - fetch acked-by tag --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector.c | 36 ++++------------------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector.c index cfcc90cb7ffbe0fb6a1c8c3b1357f7b68ebe923f..3ea25ecdf3c92959f56ba0819130b453fd2379f7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector.c @@ -13,33 +13,6 @@ #define IP_MF 0x2000 #endif -#define CHECK_FLOW_KEYS(desc, got, expected) \ - _CHECK(memcmp(&got, &expected, sizeof(got)) != 0, \ - desc, \ - topts.duration, \ - "nhoff=%u/%u " \ - "thoff=%u/%u " \ - "addr_proto=0x%x/0x%x " \ - "is_frag=%u/%u " \ - "is_first_frag=%u/%u " \ - "is_encap=%u/%u " \ - "ip_proto=0x%x/0x%x " \ - "n_proto=0x%x/0x%x " \ - "flow_label=0x%x/0x%x " \ - "sport=%u/%u " \ - "dport=%u/%u\n", \ - got.nhoff, expected.nhoff, \ - got.thoff, expected.thoff, \ - got.addr_proto, expected.addr_proto, \ - got.is_frag, expected.is_frag, \ - got.is_first_frag, expected.is_first_frag, \ - got.is_encap, expected.is_encap, \ - got.ip_proto, expected.ip_proto, \ - got.n_proto, expected.n_proto, \ - got.flow_label, expected.flow_label, \ - got.sport, expected.sport, \ - got.dport, expected.dport) - struct ipv4_pkt { struct ethhdr eth; struct iphdr iph; @@ -545,7 +518,6 @@ static void run_tests_skb_less(int tap_fd, struct bpf_map *keys) /* Keep in sync with 'flags' from eth_get_headlen. */ __u32 eth_get_headlen_flags = BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR_F_PARSE_1ST_FRAG; - LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts); struct bpf_flow_keys flow_keys = {}; __u32 key = (__u32)(tests[i].keys.sport) << 16 | tests[i].keys.dport; @@ -567,7 +539,9 @@ static void run_tests_skb_less(int tap_fd, struct bpf_map *keys) err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(keys_fd, &key, &flow_keys); ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"); - CHECK_FLOW_KEYS(tests[i].name, flow_keys, tests[i].keys); + ASSERT_MEMEQ(&flow_keys, &tests[i].keys, + sizeof(struct bpf_flow_keys), + "returned flow keys"); err = bpf_map_delete_elem(keys_fd, &key); ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_delete_elem"); @@ -656,7 +630,9 @@ void test_flow_dissector(void) continue; ASSERT_EQ(topts.data_size_out, sizeof(flow_keys), "test_run data_size_out"); - CHECK_FLOW_KEYS(tests[i].name, flow_keys, tests[i].keys); + ASSERT_MEMEQ(&flow_keys, &tests[i].keys, + sizeof(struct bpf_flow_keys), + "returned flow keys"); } /* Do the same tests but for skb-less flow dissector.