Context |
Check |
Description |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR |
success
|
PR summary
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 |
success
|
Logs for ShellCheck
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 |
success
|
Logs for Lint
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 |
success
|
Logs for Validate matrix.py
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 |
success
|
Logs for Unittests
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
|
netdev/series_format |
success
|
Posting correctly formatted
|
netdev/tree_selection |
success
|
Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
|
netdev/ynl |
success
|
Generated files up to date;
no warnings/errors;
no diff in generated;
|
netdev/fixes_present |
success
|
Fixes tag not required for -next series
|
netdev/header_inline |
success
|
No static functions without inline keyword in header files
|
netdev/build_32bit |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
|
netdev/build_tools |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 0 (+0) this patch: 0 (+0)
|
netdev/cc_maintainers |
warning
|
15 maintainers not CCed: kpsingh@kernel.org andrii@kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org shuah@kernel.org ast@kernel.org eddyz87@gmail.com song@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com haoluo@google.com daniel@iogearbox.net yonghong.song@linux.dev martin.lau@linux.dev linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org mykolal@fb.com sdf@fomichev.me
|
netdev/build_clang |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 4 this patch: 4
|
netdev/verify_signedoff |
success
|
Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
|
netdev/deprecated_api |
success
|
None detected
|
netdev/check_selftest |
success
|
No net selftest shell script
|
netdev/verify_fixes |
success
|
No Fixes tag
|
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
|
netdev/checkpatch |
warning
|
CHECK: multiple assignments should be avoided
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
WARNING: line length of 101 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 81 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 84 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 88 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns
|
netdev/build_clang_rust |
success
|
No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
|
netdev/kdoc |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
|
netdev/source_inline |
fail
|
Was 0 now: 2
|
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+
+#include <linux/btf.h>
+#include <sys/syscall.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf.h>
+
+#include "../test_btf.h"
+
+static inline int _bpf_map_create(void)
+{
+ static union bpf_attr attr = {
+ .map_type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY,
+ .key_size = 4,
+ .value_size = 8,
+ .max_entries = 1,
+ };
+
+ return syscall(__NR_bpf, BPF_MAP_CREATE, &attr, sizeof(attr));
+}
+
+static int _btf_create(void)
+{
+ struct btf_blob {
+ struct btf_header btf_hdr;
+ __u32 types[8];
+ __u32 str;
+ } raw_btf = {
+ .btf_hdr = {
+ .magic = BTF_MAGIC,
+ .version = BTF_VERSION,
+ .hdr_len = sizeof(struct btf_header),
+ .type_len = sizeof(raw_btf.types),
+ .str_off = offsetof(struct btf_blob, str) - offsetof(struct btf_blob, types),
+ .str_len = sizeof(raw_btf.str),
+ },
+ .types = {
+ /* long */
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 64, 8), /* [1] */
+ /* unsigned long */
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, 0, 0, 64, 8), /* [2] */
+ },
+ };
+ static union bpf_attr attr = {
+ .btf_size = sizeof(raw_btf),
+ };
+
+ attr.btf = (long)&raw_btf;
+
+ return syscall(__NR_bpf, BPF_BTF_LOAD, &attr, sizeof(attr));
+}
+
+static bool map_exists(__u32 id)
+{
+ int fd;
+
+ fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(id);
+ if (fd >= 0) {
+ close(fd);
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+static inline int bpf_prog_get_map_ids(int prog_fd, __u32 *nr_map_ids, __u32 *map_ids)
+{
+ __u32 len = sizeof(struct bpf_prog_info);
+ struct bpf_prog_info info = {
+ .nr_map_ids = *nr_map_ids,
+ .map_ids = ptr_to_u64(map_ids),
+ };
+ int err;
+
+ err = bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(prog_fd, &info, &len);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd"))
+ return -1;
+
+ *nr_map_ids = info.nr_map_ids;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __load_test_prog(int map_fd, int *fd_array, int fd_array_cnt)
+{
+ /* A trivial program which uses one map */
+ struct bpf_insn insns[] = {
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, map_fd),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ };
+ union bpf_attr attr = {
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, /* we don't care */
+ .insns = ptr_to_u64(insns),
+ .insn_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(insns),
+ .license = ptr_to_u64("GPL"),
+ .fd_array = ptr_to_u64(fd_array),
+ .fd_array_cnt = fd_array_cnt,
+ };
+
+ return syscall(__NR_bpf, BPF_PROG_LOAD, &attr, sizeof(attr));
+}
+
+static int load_test_prog(int *fd_array, int fd_array_cnt)
+{
+ int map_fd;
+ int ret;
+
+ map_fd = _bpf_map_create();
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(map_fd, 0, "_bpf_map_create"))
+ return map_fd;
+
+ ret = __load_test_prog(map_fd, fd_array, fd_array_cnt);
+ close(map_fd);
+
+ /* switch back to returning the actual value */
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return -errno;
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static bool check_expected_map_ids(int prog_fd, int expected, __u32 *map_ids, __u32 *nr_map_ids)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = bpf_prog_get_map_ids(prog_fd, nr_map_ids, map_ids);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_get_map_ids"))
+ return false;
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(*nr_map_ids, expected, "unexpected nr_map_ids"))
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Load a program, which uses one map. No fd_array maps are present.
+ * On return only one map is expected to be bound to prog.
+ */
+static void check_fd_array_cnt__no_fd_array(void)
+{
+ __u32 map_ids[16];
+ __u32 nr_map_ids;
+ int prog_fd = -1;
+
+ prog_fd = load_test_prog(NULL, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(prog_fd, 0, "BPF_PROG_LOAD"))
+ return;
+ nr_map_ids = ARRAY_SIZE(map_ids);
+ check_expected_map_ids(prog_fd, 1, map_ids, &nr_map_ids);
+ close(prog_fd);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Load a program, which uses one map, and pass two extra, non-equal, maps in
+ * fd_array with fd_array_cnt=2. On return three maps are expected to be bound
+ * to the program.
+ */
+static void check_fd_array_cnt__fd_array_ok(void)
+{
+ int extra_fds[2] = { -1, -1 };
+ __u32 map_ids[16];
+ __u32 nr_map_ids;
+ int prog_fd = -1;
+
+ extra_fds[0] = _bpf_map_create();
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(extra_fds[0], 0, "_bpf_map_create"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ extra_fds[1] = _bpf_map_create();
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(extra_fds[1], 0, "_bpf_map_create"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ prog_fd = load_test_prog(extra_fds, 2);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(prog_fd, 0, "BPF_PROG_LOAD"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ nr_map_ids = ARRAY_SIZE(map_ids);
+ if (!check_expected_map_ids(prog_fd, 3, map_ids, &nr_map_ids))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ /* maps should still exist when original file descriptors are closed */
+ close(extra_fds[0]);
+ close(extra_fds[1]);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(map_exists(map_ids[0]), true, "map_ids[0] should exist"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(map_exists(map_ids[1]), true, "map_ids[1] should exist"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ /* some fds might be invalid, so ignore return codes */
+cleanup:
+ close(extra_fds[1]);
+ close(extra_fds[0]);
+ close(prog_fd);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Load a program with a few extra maps duplicated in the fd_array.
+ * After the load maps should only be referenced once.
+ */
+static void check_fd_array_cnt__duplicated_maps(void)
+{
+ int extra_fds[4] = { -1, -1, -1, -1 };
+ __u32 map_ids[16];
+ __u32 nr_map_ids;
+ int prog_fd = -1;
+
+ extra_fds[0] = extra_fds[2] = _bpf_map_create();
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(extra_fds[0], 0, "_bpf_map_create"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ extra_fds[1] = extra_fds[3] = _bpf_map_create();
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(extra_fds[1], 0, "_bpf_map_create"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ prog_fd = load_test_prog(extra_fds, 4);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(prog_fd, 0, "BPF_PROG_LOAD"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ nr_map_ids = ARRAY_SIZE(map_ids);
+ if (!check_expected_map_ids(prog_fd, 3, map_ids, &nr_map_ids))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ /* maps should still exist when original file descriptors are closed */
+ close(extra_fds[0]);
+ close(extra_fds[1]);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(map_exists(map_ids[0]), true, "map should exist"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(map_exists(map_ids[1]), true, "map should exist"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ /* some fds might be invalid, so ignore return codes */
+cleanup:
+ close(extra_fds[1]);
+ close(extra_fds[0]);
+ close(prog_fd);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check that if maps which are referenced by a program are
+ * passed in fd_array, then they will be referenced only once
+ */
+static void check_fd_array_cnt__referenced_maps_in_fd_array(void)
+{
+ int extra_fds[1] = { -1 };
+ __u32 map_ids[16];
+ __u32 nr_map_ids;
+ int prog_fd = -1;
+
+ extra_fds[0] = _bpf_map_create();
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(extra_fds[0], 0, "_bpf_map_create"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ prog_fd = __load_test_prog(extra_fds[0], extra_fds, 1);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(prog_fd, 0, "BPF_PROG_LOAD"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ nr_map_ids = ARRAY_SIZE(map_ids);
+ if (!check_expected_map_ids(prog_fd, 1, map_ids, &nr_map_ids))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ /* map should still exist when original file descriptor is closed */
+ close(extra_fds[0]);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(map_exists(map_ids[0]), true, "map should exist"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ /* some fds might be invalid, so ignore return codes */
+cleanup:
+ close(extra_fds[0]);
+ close(prog_fd);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that a program with trash in fd_array can't be loaded:
+ * only map and BTF file descriptors should be accepted.
+ */
+static void check_fd_array_cnt__fd_array_with_trash(void)
+{
+ int extra_fds[3] = { -1, -1, -1 };
+ int prog_fd = -1;
+
+ extra_fds[0] = _bpf_map_create();
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(extra_fds[0], 0, "_bpf_map_create"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ extra_fds[1] = _btf_create();
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(extra_fds[1], 0, "_btf_create"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ /* trash 1: not a file descriptor */
+ extra_fds[2] = 0xbeef;
+ prog_fd = load_test_prog(extra_fds, 3);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(prog_fd, -EBADF, "prog should have been rejected with -EBADF"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ /* trash 2: not a map or btf */
+ extra_fds[2] = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(extra_fds[2], 0, "socket"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ prog_fd = load_test_prog(extra_fds, 3);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(prog_fd, -EINVAL, "prog should have been rejected with -EINVAL"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ /* some fds might be invalid, so ignore return codes */
+cleanup:
+ close(extra_fds[2]);
+ close(extra_fds[1]);
+ close(extra_fds[0]);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that a program with zeroes (= holes) in fd_array can be loaded:
+ * only map and BTF file descriptors should be accepted.
+ */
+static void check_fd_array_cnt__fd_array_with_holes(void)
+{
+ int extra_fds[4] = { -1, -1, -1, -1 };
+ int prog_fd = -1;
+
+ extra_fds[0] = _bpf_map_create();
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(extra_fds[0], 0, "_bpf_map_create"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ /* punch a hole*/
+ extra_fds[1] = 0;
+ extra_fds[2] = _btf_create();
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(extra_fds[1], 0, "_btf_create"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ /* punch a hole*/
+ extra_fds[3] = 0;
+
+ prog_fd = load_test_prog(extra_fds, 4);
+ ASSERT_GE(prog_fd, 0, "prog with holes should have been loaded");
+
+ /* some fds might be invalid, so ignore return codes */
+cleanup:
+ close(extra_fds[2]);
+ close(extra_fds[0]);
+ close(prog_fd);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that a program with too big fd_array can't be loaded.
+ */
+static void check_fd_array_cnt__fd_array_too_big(void)
+{
+ int extra_fds[65];
+ int prog_fd = -1;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 65; i++) {
+ extra_fds[i] = _bpf_map_create();
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(extra_fds[i], 0, "_bpf_map_create"))
+ goto cleanup_fds;
+ }
+
+ prog_fd = load_test_prog(extra_fds, 65);
+ ASSERT_EQ(prog_fd, -E2BIG, "prog should have been rejected with -E2BIG");
+
+cleanup_fds:
+ while (i > 0)
+ close(extra_fds[--i]);
+}
+
+void test_fd_array_cnt(void)
+{
+ if (test__start_subtest("no-fd-array"))
+ check_fd_array_cnt__no_fd_array();
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("fd-array-ok"))
+ check_fd_array_cnt__fd_array_ok();
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("fd-array-dup-input"))
+ check_fd_array_cnt__duplicated_maps();
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("fd-array-ref-maps-in-array"))
+ check_fd_array_cnt__referenced_maps_in_fd_array();
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("fd-array-trash-input"))
+ check_fd_array_cnt__fd_array_with_trash();
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("fd-array-with-holes"))
+ check_fd_array_cnt__fd_array_with_holes();
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("fd-array-2big"))
+ check_fd_array_cnt__fd_array_too_big();
+}
Add a new set of tests to test the new field in PROG_LOAD-related part of bpf_attr: fd_array_cnt. Add the following test cases: * fd_array_cnt/no-fd-array: program is loaded in a normal way, without any fd_array present * fd_array_cnt/fd-array-ok: pass two extra non-used maps, check that they're bound to the program * fd_array_cnt/fd-array-dup-input: pass a few extra maps, only two of which are unique * fd_array_cnt/fd-array-ref-maps-in-array: pass a map in fd_array which is also referenced from within the program * fd_array_cnt/fd-array-trash-input: pass array with some trash * fd_array_cnt/fd-array-with-holes: pass an array with holes (fd=0) * fd_array_cnt/fd-array-2big: pass too large array All the tests above are using the bpf(2) syscall directly, no libbpf involved. Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com> --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fd_array.c | 381 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 381 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fd_array.c