diff mbox series

[bpf] selftests/bpf: Check for PREEMPTION instead of PREEMPT

Message ID 20241119161819.qvEcs-n_@linutronix.de (mailing list archive)
State New
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf] selftests/bpf: Check for PREEMPTION instead of PREEMPT | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present fail Series targets non-next tree, but doesn't contain any Fixes tags
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 0 (+0) this patch: 0 (+0)
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 14 maintainers not CCed: kpsingh@kernel.org clrkwllms@kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org ast@kernel.org song@kernel.org linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev john.fastabend@gmail.com daniel@iogearbox.net haoluo@google.com yonghong.song@linux.dev martin.lau@linux.dev rostedt@goodmis.org elver@google.com sdf@fomichev.me
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 4 this patch: 4
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: externs should be avoided in .c files
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Nov. 19, 2024, 4:18 p.m. UTC 
CONFIG_PREEMPT is a preemtion model the so called "Low-Latency Desktop".
A different preemption model is PREEMPT_RT the so called "Real-Time".
Both implement preemption in kernel and set CONFIG_PREEMPTION.
There is also the so called "LAZY PREEMPT" which the "Scheduler
controlled preemption model". Here we have also preemption in the kernel
the rules are slightly different.

Therefore the testsuite should not check for CONFIG_PREEMPT (as one
model) but for CONFIG_PREEMPTION to figure out if preemption in the
kernel is possible.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/task_storage_map.c      | 4 ++--
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_storage.c   | 2 +-
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/read_bpf_task_storage_busy.c  | 4 ++--
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_storage_nodeadlock.c   | 4 ++--
 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/task_storage_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/task_storage_map.c
index 7d050364efca1..5fd7c923544c3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/task_storage_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/task_storage_map.c
@@ -77,8 +77,8 @@  void test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup(void)
 	CHECK(err, "open_and_load", "error %d\n", err);
 
 	/* Only for a fully preemptible kernel */
-	if (!skel->kconfig->CONFIG_PREEMPT) {
-		printf("%s SKIP (no CONFIG_PREEMPT)\n", __func__);
+	if (!skel->kconfig->CONFIG_PREEMPTION) {
+		printf("%s SKIP (no CONFIG_PREEMPTION)\n", __func__);
 		read_bpf_task_storage_busy__destroy(skel);
 		skips++;
 		return;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_storage.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_storage.c
index c33c05161a9ea..acaeebf83f3ee 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_storage.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_storage.c
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@  static void test_nodeadlock(void)
 	/* Unnecessary recursion and deadlock detection are reproducible
 	 * in the preemptible kernel.
 	 */
-	if (!skel->kconfig->CONFIG_PREEMPT) {
+	if (!skel->kconfig->CONFIG_PREEMPTION) {
 		test__skip();
 		goto done;
 	}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/read_bpf_task_storage_busy.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/read_bpf_task_storage_busy.c
index 76556e0b42b24..69da05bb6c63e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/read_bpf_task_storage_busy.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/read_bpf_task_storage_busy.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ 
 #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
 
-extern bool CONFIG_PREEMPT __kconfig __weak;
+extern bool CONFIG_PREEMPTION __kconfig __weak;
 extern const int bpf_task_storage_busy __ksym;
 
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(read_bpf_task_storage_busy)
 {
 	int *value;
 
-	if (!CONFIG_PREEMPT)
+	if (!CONFIG_PREEMPTION)
 		return 0;
 
 	if (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32 != pid)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_storage_nodeadlock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_storage_nodeadlock.c
index ea2dbb80f7b3e..986829aaf73a6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_storage_nodeadlock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_storage_nodeadlock.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@  char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
 #define EBUSY 16
 #endif
 
-extern bool CONFIG_PREEMPT __kconfig __weak;
+extern bool CONFIG_PREEMPTION __kconfig __weak;
 int nr_get_errs = 0;
 int nr_del_errs = 0;
 
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(socket_post_create, struct socket *sock, int family, int type,
 	int ret, zero = 0;
 	int *value;
 
-	if (!CONFIG_PREEMPT)
+	if (!CONFIG_PREEMPTION)
 		return 0;
 
 	task = bpf_get_current_task_btf();