diff mbox series

[bpf-next] bpf: bpf_local_storage: Always use bpf_mem_alloc in PREEMPT_RT

Message ID 20241218193000.2084281-1-martin.lau@linux.dev (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 8eef6ac4d70eb1f0099fff93321d90ce8fa49ee1
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next] bpf: bpf_local_storage: Always use bpf_mem_alloc in PREEMPT_RT | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-kernel / x86_64-gcc veristat_kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-meta / x86_64-gcc veristat_meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-43 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-45 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-44 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-46 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1 this patch: 1
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 12 maintainers not CCed: jolsa@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com bigeasy@linutronix.de yonghong.song@linux.dev eddyz87@gmail.com song@kernel.org sdf@fomichev.me clrkwllms@kernel.org kpsingh@kernel.org haoluo@google.com rostedt@goodmis.org linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 2 this patch: 2
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1 this patch: 1
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 14 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release

Commit Message

Martin KaFai Lau Dec. 18, 2024, 7:30 p.m. UTC
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

In PREEMPT_RT, kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) is still not safe in non preemptible
context. bpf_mem_alloc must be used in PREEMPT_RT. This patch is
to enforce bpf_mem_alloc in the bpf_local_storage when CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
is enabled.

[   35.118559] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48
[   35.118566] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1832, name: test_progs
[   35.118569] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
[   35.118571] RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 1
[   35.118577] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
    ...
[   35.118647]  __might_resched+0x433/0x5b0
[   35.118677]  rt_spin_lock+0xc3/0x290
[   35.118700]  ___slab_alloc+0x72/0xc40
[   35.118723]  __kmalloc_noprof+0x13f/0x4e0
[   35.118732]  bpf_map_kzalloc+0xe5/0x220
[   35.118740]  bpf_selem_alloc+0x1d2/0x7b0
[   35.118755]  bpf_local_storage_update+0x2fa/0x8b0
[   35.118784]  bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing+0x15a/0x1d0
[   35.118791]  bpf_prog_9a118d86fca78ebb_trace_inet_sock_set_state+0x44/0x66
[   35.118795]  bpf_trace_run3+0x222/0x400
[   35.118820]  __bpf_trace_inet_sock_set_state+0x11/0x20
[   35.118824]  trace_inet_sock_set_state+0x112/0x130
[   35.118830]  inet_sk_state_store+0x41/0x90
[   35.118836]  tcp_set_state+0x3b3/0x640

There is no need to adjust the gfp_flags passing to the
bpf_mem_cache_alloc_flags() which only honors the GFP_KERNEL.
The verifier has ensured GFP_KERNEL is passed only in sleepable context.

It has been an old issue since the first introduction of the
bpf_local_storage ~5 years ago, so this patch targets the bpf-next.

bpf_mem_alloc is needed to solve it, so the Fixes tag is set
to the commit when bpf_mem_alloc was first used in the bpf_local_storage.

Fixes: 08a7ce384e33 ("bpf: Use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free in bpf_local_storage_elem")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Dec. 18, 2024, 11:40 p.m. UTC | #1
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:30:00 -0800 you wrote:
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
> 
> In PREEMPT_RT, kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) is still not safe in non preemptible
> context. bpf_mem_alloc must be used in PREEMPT_RT. This patch is
> to enforce bpf_mem_alloc in the bpf_local_storage when CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> is enabled.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpf: bpf_local_storage: Always use bpf_mem_alloc in PREEMPT_RT
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8eef6ac4d70e

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index 7e6a0af0afc1..e94820f6b0cd 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -841,8 +841,12 @@  bpf_local_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr,
 	smap->elem_size = offsetof(struct bpf_local_storage_elem,
 				   sdata.data[attr->value_size]);
 
-	smap->bpf_ma = bpf_ma;
-	if (bpf_ma) {
+	/* In PREEMPT_RT, kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) is still not safe in non
+	 * preemptible context. Thus, enforce all storages to use
+	 * bpf_mem_alloc when CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is enabled.
+	 */
+	smap->bpf_ma = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) ? true : bpf_ma;
+	if (smap->bpf_ma) {
 		err = bpf_mem_alloc_init(&smap->selem_ma, smap->elem_size, false);
 		if (err)
 			goto free_smap;