diff mbox series

[bpf-next,1/2] libbpf: Add unique_match option for multi kprobe

Message ID 20241218225246.3170300-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next,1/2] libbpf: Add unique_match option for multi kprobe | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 2 (+0) this patch: 2 (+0)
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 13 maintainers not CCed: jolsa@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com ndesaulniers@google.com martin.lau@linux.dev justinstitt@google.com eddyz87@gmail.com llvm@lists.linux.dev sdf@fomichev.me morbo@google.com song@kernel.org kpsingh@kernel.org haoluo@google.com nathan@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 35 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 264 this patch: 264
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-45 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-46 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-kernel / x86_64-gcc veristat_kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-meta / x86_64-gcc veristat_meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-43 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-44 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17

Commit Message

Yonghong Song Dec. 18, 2024, 10:52 p.m. UTC
Jordan reported an issue in Meta production environment where func
try_to_wake_up() is renamed to try_to_wake_up.llvm.<hash>() by clang
compiler at lto mode. The original 'kprobe/try_to_wake_up' does not
work any more since try_to_wake_up() does not match the actual func
name in /proc/kallsyms.

There are a couple of ways to resolve this issue. For example, in
attach_kprobe(), we could do lookup in /proc/kallsyms so try_to_wake_up()
can be replaced by try_to_wake_up.llvm.<hach>(). Or we can force users
to use bpf_program__attach_kprobe() where they need to lookup
/proc/kallsyms to find out try_to_wake_up.llvm.<hach>(). But these two
approaches requires extra work by either libbpf or user.

Luckily, suggested by Andrii, multi kprobe already supports wildcard ('*')
for symbol matching. In the above example, 'try_to_wake_up*' can match
to try_to_wake_up() or try_to_wake_up.llvm.<hash>() and this allows
bpf prog works for different kernels as some kernels may have
try_to_wake_up() and some others may have try_to_wake_up.llvm.<hash>().

The original intention is to kprobe try_to_wake_up() only, so an optional
field unique_match is added to struct bpf_kprobe_multi_opts. If the
field is set to true, the number of matched functions must be one.
Otherwise, the attachment will fail. In the above case, multi kprobe
with 'try_to_wake_up*' and unique_match preserves user functionality.

Reported-by: Jordan Rome <linux@jordanrome.com>
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 10 +++++++++-
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h |  4 +++-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Jordan Rome Dec. 18, 2024, 11:12 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 5:53 PM Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> Jordan reported an issue in Meta production environment where func
> try_to_wake_up() is renamed to try_to_wake_up.llvm.<hash>() by clang
> compiler at lto mode. The original 'kprobe/try_to_wake_up' does not
> work any more since try_to_wake_up() does not match the actual func
> name in /proc/kallsyms.
>
> There are a couple of ways to resolve this issue. For example, in
> attach_kprobe(), we could do lookup in /proc/kallsyms so try_to_wake_up()
> can be replaced by try_to_wake_up.llvm.<hach>(). Or we can force users
> to use bpf_program__attach_kprobe() where they need to lookup
> /proc/kallsyms to find out try_to_wake_up.llvm.<hach>(). But these two
> approaches requires extra work by either libbpf or user.
>
> Luckily, suggested by Andrii, multi kprobe already supports wildcard ('*')
> for symbol matching. In the above example, 'try_to_wake_up*' can match
> to try_to_wake_up() or try_to_wake_up.llvm.<hash>() and this allows
> bpf prog works for different kernels as some kernels may have
> try_to_wake_up() and some others may have try_to_wake_up.llvm.<hash>().
>
> The original intention is to kprobe try_to_wake_up() only, so an optional
> field unique_match is added to struct bpf_kprobe_multi_opts. If the
> field is set to true, the number of matched functions must be one.
> Otherwise, the attachment will fail. In the above case, multi kprobe
> with 'try_to_wake_up*' and unique_match preserves user functionality.
>
> Reported-by: Jordan Rome <linux@jordanrome.com>
> Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h |  4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 66173ddb5a2d..649c6e92972a 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -11522,7 +11522,7 @@ bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog,
>         struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
>         const unsigned long *addrs;
>         int err, link_fd, prog_fd;
> -       bool retprobe, session;
> +       bool retprobe, session, unique_match;
>         const __u64 *cookies;
>         const char **syms;
>         size_t cnt;
> @@ -11558,6 +11558,14 @@ bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog,
>                         err = libbpf_available_kallsyms_parse(&res);
>                 if (err)
>                         goto error;
> +
> +               unique_match = OPTS_GET(opts, unique_match, false);
> +               if (unique_match && res.cnt != 1) {
> +                       pr_warn("prog '%s': failed to find unique match: cnt %lu\n",
> +                               prog->name, res.cnt);

nit: "failed to find a unique match. Num matches: %lu\n"
or "Failed to find a unique match for %s'. Num matches: %lu\n"

> +                       return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL);
> +               }
> +
>                 addrs = res.addrs;
>                 cnt = res.cnt;
>         }
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> index d45807103565..3020ee45303a 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> @@ -552,10 +552,12 @@ struct bpf_kprobe_multi_opts {
>         bool retprobe;
>         /* create session kprobes */
>         bool session;
> +       /* enforce unique match */
> +       bool unique_match;
>         size_t :0;
>  };
>
> -#define bpf_kprobe_multi_opts__last_field session
> +#define bpf_kprobe_multi_opts__last_field unique_match
>
>  LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
>  bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog,
> --
> 2.43.5
>

Ack. Thanks for the quick work, Yonghong!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 66173ddb5a2d..649c6e92972a 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -11522,7 +11522,7 @@  bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog,
 	struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
 	const unsigned long *addrs;
 	int err, link_fd, prog_fd;
-	bool retprobe, session;
+	bool retprobe, session, unique_match;
 	const __u64 *cookies;
 	const char **syms;
 	size_t cnt;
@@ -11558,6 +11558,14 @@  bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog,
 			err = libbpf_available_kallsyms_parse(&res);
 		if (err)
 			goto error;
+
+		unique_match = OPTS_GET(opts, unique_match, false);
+		if (unique_match && res.cnt != 1) {
+			pr_warn("prog '%s': failed to find unique match: cnt %lu\n",
+				prog->name, res.cnt);
+			return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL);
+		}
+
 		addrs = res.addrs;
 		cnt = res.cnt;
 	}
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
index d45807103565..3020ee45303a 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
@@ -552,10 +552,12 @@  struct bpf_kprobe_multi_opts {
 	bool retprobe;
 	/* create session kprobes */
 	bool session;
+	/* enforce unique match */
+	bool unique_match;
 	size_t :0;
 };
 
-#define bpf_kprobe_multi_opts__last_field session
+#define bpf_kprobe_multi_opts__last_field unique_match
 
 LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
 bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog,