Context |
Check |
Description |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR |
success
|
PR summary
|
netdev/series_format |
success
|
Posting correctly formatted
|
netdev/tree_selection |
success
|
Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
|
netdev/ynl |
success
|
Generated files up to date;
no warnings/errors;
no diff in generated;
|
netdev/fixes_present |
success
|
Fixes tag not required for -next series
|
netdev/header_inline |
success
|
No static functions without inline keyword in header files
|
netdev/build_32bit |
fail
|
Errors and warnings before: 103 this patch: 103
|
netdev/build_tools |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 0 (+0) this patch: 0 (+0)
|
netdev/cc_maintainers |
warning
|
9 maintainers not CCed: jolsa@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org yonghong.song@linux.dev eddyz87@gmail.com sdf@fomichev.me haoluo@google.com mykolal@fb.com shuah@kernel.org
|
netdev/build_clang |
fail
|
Errors and warnings before: 102 this patch: 102
|
netdev/verify_signedoff |
success
|
Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
|
netdev/deprecated_api |
success
|
None detected
|
netdev/check_selftest |
success
|
No net selftest shell script
|
netdev/verify_fixes |
success
|
No Fixes tag
|
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn |
fail
|
Errors and warnings before: 107 this patch: 107
|
netdev/checkpatch |
warning
|
CHECK: extern prototypes should be avoided in .h files
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
WARNING: const array should probably be static const
WARNING: line length of 81 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 87 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 88 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 91 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 92 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 93 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 94 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 95 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 99 exceeds 80 columns
|
netdev/build_clang_rust |
success
|
No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
|
netdev/kdoc |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
|
netdev/source_inline |
fail
|
Was 0 now: 1
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-47 |
pending
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-48 |
pending
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-49 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-kernel
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-50 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-meta
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 |
success
|
Logs for Lint
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 |
success
|
Logs for ShellCheck
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 |
success
|
Logs for Unittests
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 |
success
|
Logs for Validate matrix.py
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-kernel
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-meta
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-kernel
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-meta
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-kernel
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-meta
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-45 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-kernel
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-46 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-meta
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-kernel / x86_64-gcc veristat_kernel
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-meta / x86_64-gcc veristat_meta
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-44 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-43 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
@@ -87,4 +87,9 @@ struct dentry;
*/
extern int bpf_get_dentry_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name,
struct bpf_dynptr *value_ptr) __ksym __weak;
+
+extern int bpf_set_dentry_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name__str,
+ const struct bpf_dynptr *value_p, int flags) __ksym __weak;
+extern int bpf_remove_dentry_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name__str) __ksym __weak;
+
#endif
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <unistd.h>
#include <test_progs.h>
#include "test_get_xattr.skel.h"
+#include "test_set_remove_xattr.skel.h"
#include "test_fsverity.skel.h"
static const char testfile[] = "/tmp/test_progs_fs_kfuncs";
@@ -72,6 +73,127 @@ static void test_get_xattr(const char *name, const char *value, bool allow_acces
remove(testfile);
}
+/* xattr value we will set to security.bpf.foo */
+static const char value_foo[] = "hello";
+
+static void read_and_validate_foo(struct test_set_remove_xattr *skel)
+{
+ char value_out[32];
+ int err;
+
+ err = getxattr(testfile, skel->rodata->xattr_foo, value_out, sizeof(value_out));
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, sizeof(value_foo), "getxattr size foo");
+ ASSERT_EQ(strncmp(value_out, value_foo, sizeof(value_foo)), 0, "strncmp value_foo");
+}
+
+static void set_foo(struct test_set_remove_xattr *skel)
+{
+ ASSERT_OK(setxattr(testfile, skel->rodata->xattr_foo, value_foo, strlen(value_foo) + 1, 0),
+ "setxattr foo");
+}
+
+static void validate_bar_match(struct test_set_remove_xattr *skel)
+{
+ char value_out[32];
+ int err;
+
+ err = getxattr(testfile, skel->rodata->xattr_bar, value_out, sizeof(value_out));
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, sizeof(skel->data->value_bar), "getxattr size bar");
+ ASSERT_EQ(strncmp(value_out, skel->data->value_bar, sizeof(skel->data->value_bar)), 0,
+ "strncmp value_bar");
+}
+
+static void validate_bar_removed(struct test_set_remove_xattr *skel)
+{
+ char value_out[32];
+ int err;
+
+ err = getxattr(testfile, skel->rodata->xattr_bar, value_out, sizeof(value_out));
+ ASSERT_LT(err, 0, "getxattr size bar should fail");
+}
+
+static void test_set_remove_xattr(void)
+{
+ struct test_set_remove_xattr *skel = NULL;
+ int fd = -1, err;
+
+ fd = open(testfile, O_CREAT | O_RDONLY, 0644);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(fd, 0, "create_file"))
+ return;
+
+ close(fd);
+ fd = -1;
+
+ skel = test_set_remove_xattr__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_set_remove_xattr__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ /* Set security.bpf.foo to "hello" */
+ err = setxattr(testfile, skel->rodata->xattr_foo, value_foo, strlen(value_foo) + 1, 0);
+ if (err && errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ printf("%s:SKIP:local fs doesn't support xattr (%d)\n"
+ "To run this test, make sure /tmp filesystem supports xattr.\n",
+ __func__, errno);
+ test__skip();
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "setxattr"))
+ goto out;
+
+ skel->bss->monitored_pid = getpid();
+ err = test_set_remove_xattr__attach(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_set_remove_xattr__attach"))
+ goto out;
+
+ /* First, test not _locked version of the kfuncs with getxattr. */
+
+ /* Read security.bpf.foo and trigger test_inode_getxattr. This
+ * bpf program will set security.bpf.bar to "world".
+ */
+ read_and_validate_foo(skel);
+ validate_bar_match(skel);
+
+ /* Read security.bpf.foo and trigger test_inode_getxattr again.
+ * This will remove xattr security.bpf.bar.
+ */
+ read_and_validate_foo(skel);
+ validate_bar_removed(skel);
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(skel->bss->set_security_bpf_bar_success, "set_security_bpf_bar_success");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(skel->bss->remove_security_bpf_bar_success, "remove_security_bpf_bar_success");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(skel->bss->set_security_selinux_fail, "set_security_selinux_fail");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(skel->bss->remove_security_selinux_fail, "remove_security_selinux_fail");
+
+ /* Second, test _locked version of the kfuncs, with setxattr */
+
+ /* Set security.bpf.foo and trigger test_inode_setxattr. This
+ * bpf program will set security.bpf.bar to "world".
+ */
+ set_foo(skel);
+ validate_bar_match(skel);
+
+ /* Set security.bpf.foo and trigger test_inode_setxattr again.
+ * This will remove xattr security.bpf.bar.
+ */
+ set_foo(skel);
+ validate_bar_removed(skel);
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(skel->bss->locked_set_security_bpf_bar_success,
+ "locked_set_security_bpf_bar_success");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(skel->bss->locked_remove_security_bpf_bar_success,
+ "locked_remove_security_bpf_bar_success");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(skel->bss->locked_set_security_selinux_fail,
+ "locked_set_security_selinux_fail");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(skel->bss->locked_remove_security_selinux_fail,
+ "locked_remove_security_selinux_fail");
+
+out:
+ close(fd);
+ test_set_remove_xattr__destroy(skel);
+ remove(testfile);
+}
+
#ifndef SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE
#define SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE 32
#endif
@@ -161,6 +283,9 @@ void test_fs_kfuncs(void)
if (test__start_subtest("security_selinux_xattr_error"))
test_get_xattr("security.selinux", "hello", false);
+ if (test__start_subtest("set_remove_xattr"))
+ test_set_remove_xattr();
+
if (test__start_subtest("fsverity"))
test_fsverity();
}
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include "bpf_kfuncs.h"
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+__u32 monitored_pid;
+
+const char xattr_foo[] = "security.bpf.foo";
+const char xattr_bar[] = "security.bpf.bar";
+const char xattr_linux[] = "security.selinux";
+char value_bar[] = "world";
+char read_value[32];
+
+bool set_security_bpf_bar_success;
+bool remove_security_bpf_bar_success;
+bool set_security_selinux_fail;
+bool remove_security_selinux_fail;
+
+char name_buf[32];
+
+static inline bool name_match_foo(const char *name)
+{
+ bpf_probe_read_kernel(name_buf, sizeof(name_buf), name);
+
+ return !bpf_strncmp(name_buf, sizeof(xattr_foo), xattr_foo);
+}
+
+/* Test bpf_set_dentry_xattr and bpf_remove_dentry_xattr */
+SEC("lsm.s/inode_getxattr")
+int BPF_PROG(test_inode_getxattr, struct dentry *dentry, char *name)
+{
+ struct bpf_dynptr value_ptr;
+ __u32 pid;
+ int ret;
+
+ pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
+ if (pid != monitored_pid)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Only do the following for security.bpf.foo */
+ if (!name_match_foo(name))
+ return 0;
+
+ bpf_dynptr_from_mem(read_value, sizeof(read_value), 0, &value_ptr);
+
+ /* read security.bpf.bar */
+ ret = bpf_get_dentry_xattr(dentry, xattr_bar, &value_ptr);
+
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ /* If security.bpf.bar doesn't exist, set it */
+ bpf_dynptr_from_mem(value_bar, sizeof(value_bar), 0, &value_ptr);
+
+ ret = bpf_set_dentry_xattr(dentry, xattr_bar, &value_ptr, 0);
+ if (!ret)
+ set_security_bpf_bar_success = true;
+ ret = bpf_set_dentry_xattr(dentry, xattr_linux, &value_ptr, 0);
+ if (ret)
+ set_security_selinux_fail = true;
+ } else {
+ /* If security.bpf.bar exists, remove it */
+ ret = bpf_remove_dentry_xattr(dentry, xattr_bar);
+ if (!ret)
+ remove_security_bpf_bar_success = true;
+
+ ret = bpf_remove_dentry_xattr(dentry, xattr_linux);
+ if (ret)
+ remove_security_selinux_fail = true;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+bool locked_set_security_bpf_bar_success;
+bool locked_remove_security_bpf_bar_success;
+bool locked_set_security_selinux_fail;
+bool locked_remove_security_selinux_fail;
+
+/* Test bpf_set_dentry_xattr_locked and bpf_remove_dentry_xattr_locked.
+ * It not necessary to differentiate the _locked version and the
+ * not-_locked version in the BPF program. The verifier will fix them up
+ * properly.
+ */
+SEC("lsm.s/inode_setxattr")
+int BPF_PROG(test_inode_setxattr, struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
+ struct dentry *dentry, const char *name,
+ const void *value, size_t size, int flags)
+{
+ struct bpf_dynptr value_ptr;
+ __u32 pid;
+ int ret;
+
+ pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
+ if (pid != monitored_pid)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Only do the following for security.bpf.foo */
+ if (!name_match_foo(name))
+ return 0;
+
+ bpf_dynptr_from_mem(read_value, sizeof(read_value), 0, &value_ptr);
+
+ /* read security.bpf.bar */
+ ret = bpf_get_dentry_xattr(dentry, xattr_bar, &value_ptr);
+
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ /* If security.bpf.bar doesn't exist, set it */
+ bpf_dynptr_from_mem(value_bar, sizeof(value_bar), 0, &value_ptr);
+
+ ret = bpf_set_dentry_xattr(dentry, xattr_bar, &value_ptr, 0);
+ if (!ret)
+ locked_set_security_bpf_bar_success = true;
+ ret = bpf_set_dentry_xattr(dentry, xattr_linux, &value_ptr, 0);
+ if (ret)
+ locked_set_security_selinux_fail = true;
+ } else {
+ /* If security.bpf.bar exists, remove it */
+ ret = bpf_remove_dentry_xattr(dentry, xattr_bar);
+ if (!ret)
+ locked_remove_security_bpf_bar_success = true;
+
+ ret = bpf_remove_dentry_xattr(dentry, xattr_linux);
+ if (ret)
+ locked_remove_security_selinux_fail = true;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
Two sets of tests are added to exercise the not _locked and _locked version of the kfuncs. For both tests, user space accesses xattr security.bpf.foo on a testfile. The BPF program is triggered by user space access (on LSM hook inode_[set|get]_xattr) and sets or removes xattr security.bpf.bar. Then user space then validates that xattr security.bpf.bar is set or removed as expected. Note that, in both tests, the BPF programs use the not _locked kfuncs. The verifier picks the proper kfuncs based on the calling context. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h | 5 + .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fs_kfuncs.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++ .../bpf/progs/test_set_remove_xattr.c | 133 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 263 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_set_remove_xattr.c