diff mbox series

[bpf-next,4/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_map_get_num_entries

Message ID 20250106145328.399610-5-charalampos.stylianopoulos@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series expose number of map entries to userspace | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-46 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-45 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-kernel / x86_64-gcc veristat_kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-meta / x86_64-gcc veristat_meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-44 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-43 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 0 (+0) this patch: 0 (+0)
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 14 maintainers not CCed: jolsa@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com houtao1@huawei.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev yonghong.song@linux.dev eddyz87@gmail.com andrii@kernel.org song@kernel.org sdf@fomichev.me kpsingh@kernel.org haoluo@google.com mykolal@fb.com shuah@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines WARNING: line length of 82 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 84 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Charalampos Stylianopoulos Jan. 6, 2025, 2:53 p.m. UTC
Extend the existing selftests for maps with checks that the number of
map entries returned by bpf_map_get_num_entries is as expected.

Co-developed-by: Nick Zavaritsky <mejedi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Zavaritsky <mejedi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Charalampos Stylianopoulos <charalampos.stylianopoulos@gmail.com>
---
 .../bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_basic_ops.c    |  5 +++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c       | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_basic_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_basic_ops.c
index d32e4edac930..40265b497791 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_basic_ops.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_basic_ops.c
@@ -434,6 +434,11 @@  static void test_lpm_ipaddr(void)
 	inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2a00:ffff::", key_ipv6->data);
 	assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv6, key_ipv6, &value) == -ENOENT);
 
+	unsigned int entries;
+	/* Check that the reported number of entries in the map is as expected. */
+	assert(bpf_map_get_num_entries(map_fd_ipv4, &entries) == 0 && entries == 5);
+	assert(bpf_map_get_num_entries(map_fd_ipv6, &entries) == 0 && entries == 1);
+
 	close(map_fd_ipv4);
 	close(map_fd_ipv6);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
index 8b40e9496af1..c61cf740a6b6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
@@ -109,6 +109,10 @@  static void test_hashmap(unsigned int task, void *data)
 	assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(fd, &next_key, &next_key) < 0 &&
 	       errno == ENOENT);
 
+	unsigned int entries;
+	/* Check that the number of entries in the map is 2. */
+	assert(bpf_map_get_num_entries(fd, &entries) == 0 && entries == 2);
+
 	/* Delete both elements. */
 	key = 1;
 	assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(fd, &key) == 0);
@@ -122,6 +126,7 @@  static void test_hashmap(unsigned int task, void *data)
 	       errno == ENOENT);
 	assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(fd, &key, &next_key) < 0 &&
 	       errno == ENOENT);
+	assert(bpf_map_get_num_entries(fd, &entries) == 0 && entries == 0);
 
 	close(fd);
 }
@@ -243,6 +248,11 @@  static void test_hashmap_percpu(unsigned int task, void *data)
 	key = 1;
 	assert(bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == 0);
 
+
+	unsigned int entries;
+	/* Check that the number of entries in the map is 2. */
+	assert(bpf_map_get_num_entries(fd, &entries) == 0 && entries == 2);
+
 	/* Delete both elements. */
 	key = 1;
 	assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(fd, &key) == 0);
@@ -256,6 +266,7 @@  static void test_hashmap_percpu(unsigned int task, void *data)
 	       errno == ENOENT);
 	assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(fd, &key, &next_key) < 0 &&
 	       errno == ENOENT);
+	assert(bpf_map_get_num_entries(fd, &entries) == 0 && entries == 0);
 
 	close(fd);
 }
@@ -529,6 +540,10 @@  static void test_devmap_hash(unsigned int task, void *data)
 		exit(1);
 	}
 
+	unsigned int entries;
+	/* Check that the number of entries in the map is 0. */
+	assert(bpf_map_get_num_entries(fd, &entries) == 0 && entries == 0);
+
 	close(fd);
 }
 
@@ -557,10 +572,17 @@  static void test_queuemap(unsigned int task, void *data)
 		exit(1);
 	}
 
+	unsigned int entries;
+	/* Check that the number of entries in the map is 0. */
+	assert(bpf_map_get_num_entries(fd, &entries) == 0 && entries == 0);
+
 	/* Push MAP_SIZE elements */
 	for (i = 0; i < MAP_SIZE; i++)
 		assert(bpf_map_update_elem(fd, NULL, &vals[i], 0) == 0);
 
+	/* Check that the number of entries in the map is MAP_SIZE. */
+	assert(bpf_map_get_num_entries(fd, &entries) == 0 && entries == MAP_SIZE);
+
 	/* Check that element cannot be pushed due to max_entries limit */
 	assert(bpf_map_update_elem(fd, NULL, &val, 0) < 0 &&
 	       errno == E2BIG);
@@ -581,6 +603,9 @@  static void test_queuemap(unsigned int task, void *data)
 	assert(bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_elem(fd, NULL, &val) < 0 &&
 	       errno == ENOENT);
 
+	/* Check that the number of entries in the map is 0. */
+	assert(bpf_map_get_num_entries(fd, &entries) == 0 && entries == 0);
+
 	/* Check that non supported functions set errno to EINVAL */
 	assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(fd, NULL) < 0 && errno == EINVAL);
 	assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(fd, NULL, NULL) < 0 && errno == EINVAL);
@@ -613,10 +638,17 @@  static void test_stackmap(unsigned int task, void *data)
 		exit(1);
 	}
 
+	unsigned int entries;
+	/* Check that the number of entries in the map is 0. */
+	assert(bpf_map_get_num_entries(fd, &entries) == 0 && entries == 0);
+
 	/* Push MAP_SIZE elements */
 	for (i = 0; i < MAP_SIZE; i++)
 		assert(bpf_map_update_elem(fd, NULL, &vals[i], 0) == 0);
 
+	/* Check that the number of entries in the map is MAP_SIZE. */
+	assert(bpf_map_get_num_entries(fd, &entries) == 0 && entries == MAP_SIZE);
+
 	/* Check that element cannot be pushed due to max_entries limit */
 	assert(bpf_map_update_elem(fd, NULL, &val, 0) < 0 &&
 	       errno == E2BIG);
@@ -637,6 +669,9 @@  static void test_stackmap(unsigned int task, void *data)
 	assert(bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_elem(fd, NULL, &val) < 0 &&
 	       errno == ENOENT);
 
+	/* Check that the number of entries in the map is 0. */
+	assert(bpf_map_get_num_entries(fd, &entries) == 0 && entries == 0);
+
 	/* Check that non supported functions set errno to EINVAL */
 	assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(fd, NULL) < 0 && errno == EINVAL);
 	assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(fd, NULL, NULL) < 0 && errno == EINVAL);