Context |
Check |
Description |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR |
success
|
PR summary
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 |
success
|
Logs for Unittests
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 |
success
|
Logs for ShellCheck
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 |
success
|
Logs for Lint
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 |
success
|
Logs for Validate matrix.py
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-kernel
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-meta
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-kernel
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-meta
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-kernel
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-meta
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-44 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-45 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-kernel
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-46 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-meta
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-kernel / x86_64-gcc veristat_kernel
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-meta / x86_64-gcc veristat_meta
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-43 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
netdev/series_format |
success
|
Posting correctly formatted
|
netdev/tree_selection |
success
|
Guessed tree name to be net-next
|
netdev/ynl |
success
|
Generated files up to date;
no warnings/errors;
no diff in generated;
|
netdev/fixes_present |
success
|
Fixes tag not required for -next series
|
netdev/header_inline |
success
|
No static functions without inline keyword in header files
|
netdev/build_32bit |
fail
|
Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 1
|
netdev/build_tools |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 26 (+1) this patch: 26 (+1)
|
netdev/cc_maintainers |
success
|
CCed 13 of 13 maintainers
|
netdev/build_clang |
fail
|
Errors and warnings before: 204 this patch: 206
|
netdev/verify_signedoff |
success
|
Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
|
netdev/deprecated_api |
success
|
None detected
|
netdev/check_selftest |
success
|
No net selftest shell script
|
netdev/verify_fixes |
success
|
No Fixes tag
|
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn |
fail
|
Errors and warnings before: 63 this patch: 64
|
netdev/checkpatch |
warning
|
WARNING: 'unkown' may be misspelled - perhaps 'unknown'?
WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
|
netdev/build_clang_rust |
success
|
No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
|
netdev/kdoc |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
|
netdev/source_inline |
success
|
Was 0 now: 0
|
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ struct tnum tnum_intersect(struct tnum a, struct tnum b);
/* Return @a with all but the lowest @size bytes cleared */
struct tnum tnum_cast(struct tnum a, u8 size);
+/* Return @a sign-extended from @size bytes */
+struct tnum tnum_scast(struct tnum a, u8 size);
+
/* Returns true if @a is a known constant */
static inline bool tnum_is_const(struct tnum a)
{
@@ -157,6 +157,35 @@ struct tnum tnum_cast(struct tnum a, u8 size)
return a;
}
+struct tnum tnum_scast(struct tnum a, u8 size)
+{
+ u64 s = size * 8 - 1;
+ u64 sign_mask;
+ u64 value_mask;
+ u64 new_value, new_mask;
+ u64 sign_bit_unknown, sign_bit_value;
+ u64 mask;
+
+ if (size >= 8) {
+ return a;
+ }
+
+ sign_mask = 1ULL << s;
+ value_mask = (1ULL << (s + 1)) - 1;
+
+ new_value = a.value & value_mask;
+ new_mask = a.mask & value_mask;
+
+ sign_bit_unknown = (a.mask >> s) & 1;
+ sign_bit_value = (a.value >> s) & 1;
+
+ mask = ~value_mask;
+ new_mask |= mask & (0 - sign_bit_unknown);
+ new_value |= mask & (0 - ((sign_bit_unknown ^ 1) & sign_bit_value));
+
+ return TNUM(new_value, new_mask);
+}
+
bool tnum_is_aligned(struct tnum a, u64 size)
{
if (!size)
This patch introduces a new helper function - tnum_scast(), which sign-extends a tnum from a smaller integer size to the full 64-bit bpf register range. This is achieved by: Given a tnum (v, m) and target size S bytes: 1) Mask value/mask to S bytes: val = v & mask, msk = m & mask 2) If sign bit (bit S*8-1) is unknown (msk has bit set): - Extended bits become unknown (mask |= ~value_mask) - Sign possibilities constrain value (if sign could be 1, upper bits must allow both 0s and 1s) 3) If sign bit is known: - Upper bits follow sign extension of val - Mask upper bits then follow sign extension of msk a) When the sign bit is known: Assume a tnum with value = 0xFF, mask = 0x00, size = 1, which corresponds to an 8-bit subregister of value 0xFF. We extract the sign bit position, compute the value mask, apply it to the lower bits and check the sign bit at said position. s = size * 8 - 1 // 1 * 8 - 1 = 7. value_mask = (1ULL << (s + 1)) - 1; // (1 << (7 + 1)) - 1 = 0xFF new_value = a.value & value_mask; // 0xFF & 0xFF = 0xFF new_mask = a.mask & value_mask; // 0x00 & 0xFF = 0x00 sign_bit_unknown = (0x00 >> 7) & 1 = 0; // sign bit is known sign_bit_value = (0xFF >> 7) & 1 = 1; // with value 1 Because the sign bit is known to be 1, we sign-extend with 1s above bit 7, so all upper bits [63,8] become 1, new_value in 64 bits is 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF and new_mask for those bits is 0 (since we know for sure they are all 1). So after the tnum_scast call and the sign extension, the tnum is (0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0x0000000000000000), which corresponds to the 64-bit value -1. b) When the sign bit is unknown: Assume a tnum wih value = 0x7F, mask = 0x80, size = 1. In this case the lower 8 bits [6,0] are known to be 0x7F or b(0111 1111). Bit 7 is unknown (mask = 0x80), so it could be 0 or 1. This means the subregister could be 0x7F (+127) or 0xFF (-1), or otherwise anythnig that differs in bit 7. Following the same operations as the previous example, we get s = 7 and value_mask = 0xFF. Then: new_value = a.value & value_mask; // 0x7F & 0xFF = 0x7F new_mask = a.mask & value_mask; // 0x80 & 0xFF = 0x80 sign_bit_unknown = (0x80 >> 7) & 1 = 1; // bit 7 is unknown // sign bit is unkown, so we treat upper bits [63,8] as unknown new_mask |= ~value_mask; This leads to a new tnum with value=0x7F, mask=0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFF80 The lower 8 bits can be 0x7F or 0xFF, and the higher 56 bits are fully unknown. In 64-bit form, this tnum can represent anything from: 0x000000000000007F (+127) if the sign bit is 0 and all higher bits are 0, up to 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF (-1) if the sign bit and all higher bits are 1. Signed-off-by: Dimitar Kanaliev <dimitar.kanaliev@siteground.com> --- include/linux/tnum.h | 3 +++ kernel/bpf/tnum.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)