Message ID | 20250204194624.46560-1-ericwouds@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2,net-next] net: ethernet: mtk_ppe_offload: Allow QinQ | expand |
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 08:46:24PM +0100, Eric Woudstra wrote: > mtk_foe_entry_set_vlan() in mtk_ppe.c already seems to support > double vlan tagging, but mtk_flow_offload_replace() in > mtk_ppe_offload.c only allows for 1 vlan tag, optionally in > combination with pppoe and dsa tags. > > This patch adds QinQ support to mtk_flow_offload_replace(). > > Only PPPoE-in-Q (as before) and Q-in-Q are allowed. A combination > of PPPoE and Q-in-Q is not allowed. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com> > --- > > Since the RFC v1 did not recieve any comments, I'm sending v2 as PATCH > unchanged. > > Tested on the BPI-R3(mini), on non-dsa-ports and dsa-ports. > > .../net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c | 21 +++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c > index f20bb390df3a..c19789883a9d 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c > @@ -34,8 +34,10 @@ struct mtk_flow_data { > u16 vlan_in; > > struct { > - u16 id; > - __be16 proto; > + struct { > + u16 id; > + __be16 proto; > + } vlans[2]; > u8 num; > } vlan; > struct { > @@ -349,18 +351,19 @@ mtk_flow_offload_replace(struct mtk_eth *eth, struct flow_cls_offload *f, > case FLOW_ACTION_CSUM: > break; > case FLOW_ACTION_VLAN_PUSH: > - if (data.vlan.num == 1 || > + if (data.vlan.num + data.pppoe.num == 2 || > act->vlan.proto != htons(ETH_P_8021Q)) > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > - data.vlan.id = act->vlan.vid; > - data.vlan.proto = act->vlan.proto; > + data.vlan.vlans[data.vlan.num].id = act->vlan.vid; > + data.vlan.vlans[data.vlan.num].proto = act->vlan.proto; > data.vlan.num++; > break; > case FLOW_ACTION_VLAN_POP: > break; > case FLOW_ACTION_PPPOE_PUSH: > - if (data.pppoe.num == 1) > + if (data.pppoe.num == 1 || > + data.vlan.num == 2) > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > data.pppoe.sid = act->pppoe.sid; > @@ -450,11 +453,11 @@ mtk_flow_offload_replace(struct mtk_eth *eth, struct flow_cls_offload *f, > if (offload_type == MTK_PPE_PKT_TYPE_BRIDGE) > foe.bridge.vlan = data.vlan_in; > > - if (data.vlan.num == 1) { > - if (data.vlan.proto != htons(ETH_P_8021Q)) > + for (i = 0; i < data.vlan.num; i++) { > + if (data.vlan.vlans[i].proto != htons(ETH_P_8021Q)) It is already checked in FLOW_ACTION_VLAN_PUSH, so data.vlan.num can't be increased if proto is different. No need to check it again. Other than that rest looks fine. > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > - mtk_foe_entry_set_vlan(eth, &foe, data.vlan.id); > + mtk_foe_entry_set_vlan(eth, &foe, data.vlan.vlans[i].id); > } > if (data.pppoe.num == 1) > mtk_foe_entry_set_pppoe(eth, &foe, data.pppoe.sid); > -- > 2.47.1 >
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c index f20bb390df3a..c19789883a9d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c @@ -34,8 +34,10 @@ struct mtk_flow_data { u16 vlan_in; struct { - u16 id; - __be16 proto; + struct { + u16 id; + __be16 proto; + } vlans[2]; u8 num; } vlan; struct { @@ -349,18 +351,19 @@ mtk_flow_offload_replace(struct mtk_eth *eth, struct flow_cls_offload *f, case FLOW_ACTION_CSUM: break; case FLOW_ACTION_VLAN_PUSH: - if (data.vlan.num == 1 || + if (data.vlan.num + data.pppoe.num == 2 || act->vlan.proto != htons(ETH_P_8021Q)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; - data.vlan.id = act->vlan.vid; - data.vlan.proto = act->vlan.proto; + data.vlan.vlans[data.vlan.num].id = act->vlan.vid; + data.vlan.vlans[data.vlan.num].proto = act->vlan.proto; data.vlan.num++; break; case FLOW_ACTION_VLAN_POP: break; case FLOW_ACTION_PPPOE_PUSH: - if (data.pppoe.num == 1) + if (data.pppoe.num == 1 || + data.vlan.num == 2) return -EOPNOTSUPP; data.pppoe.sid = act->pppoe.sid; @@ -450,11 +453,11 @@ mtk_flow_offload_replace(struct mtk_eth *eth, struct flow_cls_offload *f, if (offload_type == MTK_PPE_PKT_TYPE_BRIDGE) foe.bridge.vlan = data.vlan_in; - if (data.vlan.num == 1) { - if (data.vlan.proto != htons(ETH_P_8021Q)) + for (i = 0; i < data.vlan.num; i++) { + if (data.vlan.vlans[i].proto != htons(ETH_P_8021Q)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; - mtk_foe_entry_set_vlan(eth, &foe, data.vlan.id); + mtk_foe_entry_set_vlan(eth, &foe, data.vlan.vlans[i].id); } if (data.pppoe.num == 1) mtk_foe_entry_set_pppoe(eth, &foe, data.pppoe.sid);
mtk_foe_entry_set_vlan() in mtk_ppe.c already seems to support double vlan tagging, but mtk_flow_offload_replace() in mtk_ppe_offload.c only allows for 1 vlan tag, optionally in combination with pppoe and dsa tags. This patch adds QinQ support to mtk_flow_offload_replace(). Only PPPoE-in-Q (as before) and Q-in-Q are allowed. A combination of PPPoE and Q-in-Q is not allowed. Signed-off-by: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com> --- Since the RFC v1 did not recieve any comments, I'm sending v2 as PATCH unchanged. Tested on the BPI-R3(mini), on non-dsa-ports and dsa-ports. .../net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c | 21 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)