| Message ID | 20250219054247.733243-5-wei.fang@nxp.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Changes Requested |
| Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | net: enetc: fix some known issues | expand |
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 01:42:42PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote: > Actually ENETC VFs do not support HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC because only > ENETC PF can access PMa_SINGLE_STEP registers. And there will be a crash > if VFs are used to test one-step timestamp, the crash log as follows. > > [ 129.110909] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00000000000080c0 > [ 129.287769] Call trace: > [ 129.290219] enetc_port_mac_wr+0x30/0xec (P) > [ 129.294504] enetc_start_xmit+0xda4/0xe74 > [ 129.298525] enetc_xmit+0x70/0xec > [ 129.301848] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x98/0x118 > > Fixes: 41514737ecaa ("enetc: add get_ts_info interface for ethtool") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com> > --- Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Tested-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c index 83f9e8a9ab2b..77f8ef5358b6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c @@ -3229,6 +3229,9 @@ static int enetc_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *ndev, struct ifreq *ifr) new_offloads |= ENETC_F_TX_TSTAMP; break; case HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC: + if (!enetc_si_is_pf(priv->si)) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + new_offloads &= ~ENETC_F_TX_TSTAMP_MASK; new_offloads |= ENETC_F_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC_TSTAMP; break; diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c index bf34b5bb1e35..ece3ae28ba82 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c @@ -832,6 +832,7 @@ static int enetc_set_coalesce(struct net_device *ndev, static int enetc_get_ts_info(struct net_device *ndev, struct kernel_ethtool_ts_info *info) { + struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); int *phc_idx; phc_idx = symbol_get(enetc_phc_index); @@ -852,8 +853,10 @@ static int enetc_get_ts_info(struct net_device *ndev, SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE; info->tx_types = (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_OFF) | - (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ON) | - (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC); + (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ON); + + if (enetc_si_is_pf(priv->si)) + info->tx_types |= (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC); info->rx_filters = (1 << HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE) | (1 << HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL);
Actually ENETC VFs do not support HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC because only ENETC PF can access PMa_SINGLE_STEP registers. And there will be a crash if VFs are used to test one-step timestamp, the crash log as follows. [ 129.110909] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00000000000080c0 [ 129.287769] Call trace: [ 129.290219] enetc_port_mac_wr+0x30/0xec (P) [ 129.294504] enetc_start_xmit+0xda4/0xe74 [ 129.298525] enetc_xmit+0x70/0xec [ 129.301848] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x98/0x118 Fixes: 41514737ecaa ("enetc: add get_ts_info interface for ethtool") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 3 +++ drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c | 7 +++++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)