@@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ s32 bpf_find_btf_id(const char *name, u32 kind, struct btf **btf_p)
spin_unlock_bh(&btf_idr_lock);
return ret;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_find_btf_id);
const struct btf_type *btf_type_skip_modifiers(const struct btf *btf,
u32 id, u32 *res_id)
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include "epilogue_tailcall.skel.h"
#include "pro_epilogue_goto_start.skel.h"
#include "epilogue_exit.skel.h"
+#include "pro_epilogue_with_kfunc.skel.h"
struct st_ops_args {
__u64 a;
@@ -55,6 +56,7 @@ void test_pro_epilogue(void)
RUN_TESTS(pro_epilogue);
RUN_TESTS(pro_epilogue_goto_start);
RUN_TESTS(epilogue_exit);
+ RUN_TESTS(pro_epilogue_with_kfunc);
if (test__start_subtest("tailcall"))
test_tailcall();
}
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2025 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+#include "../test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h"
+#include "../test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+void __kfunc_btf_root(void)
+{
+ bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10(NULL);
+}
+
+static __noinline __used int subprog(struct st_ops_args *args)
+{
+ args->a += 1;
+ return args->a;
+}
+
+__success
+/* prologue */
+__xlated("0: r8 = r1")
+__xlated("1: r1 = 0")
+__xlated("2: call kernel-function")
+__xlated("3: if r0 != 0x0 goto pc+5")
+__xlated("4: r6 = *(u64 *)(r8 +0)")
+__xlated("5: r7 = *(u64 *)(r6 +0)")
+__xlated("6: r7 += 1000")
+__xlated("7: *(u64 *)(r6 +0) = r7")
+__xlated("8: goto pc+2")
+__xlated("9: r1 = r0")
+__xlated("10: call kernel-function")
+__xlated("11: r1 = r8")
+/* main prog */
+__xlated("12: r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)")
+__xlated("13: r6 = r1")
+__xlated("14: call kernel-function")
+__xlated("15: r1 = r6")
+__xlated("16: call pc+1")
+__xlated("17: exit")
+SEC("struct_ops/test_prologue")
+__naked int test_kfunc_prologue(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0);"
+ "r6 = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10];"
+ "r1 = r6;"
+ "call subprog;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+__success
+/* save __u64 *ctx to stack */
+__xlated("0: *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1")
+/* main prog */
+__xlated("1: r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)")
+__xlated("2: r6 = r1")
+__xlated("3: call kernel-function")
+__xlated("4: r1 = r6")
+__xlated("5: call pc+")
+/* epilogue */
+__xlated("6: r1 = 0")
+__xlated("7: call kernel-function")
+__xlated("8: if r0 != 0x0 goto pc+6")
+__xlated("9: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)")
+__xlated("10: r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)")
+__xlated("11: r6 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)")
+__xlated("12: r6 += 10000")
+__xlated("13: *(u64 *)(r1 +0) = r6")
+__xlated("14: goto pc+2")
+__xlated("15: r1 = r0")
+__xlated("16: call kernel-function")
+__xlated("17: r0 = r6")
+__xlated("18: r0 *= 2")
+__xlated("19: exit")
+SEC("struct_ops/test_epilogue")
+__naked int test_kfunc_epilogue(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0);"
+ "r6 = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10];"
+ "r1 = r6;"
+ "call subprog;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+__success
+/* prologue */
+__xlated("0: r8 = r1")
+__xlated("1: r1 = 0")
+__xlated("2: call kernel-function")
+__xlated("3: if r0 != 0x0 goto pc+5")
+__xlated("4: r6 = *(u64 *)(r8 +0)")
+__xlated("5: r7 = *(u64 *)(r6 +0)")
+__xlated("6: r7 += 1000")
+__xlated("7: *(u64 *)(r6 +0) = r7")
+__xlated("8: goto pc+2")
+__xlated("9: r1 = r0")
+__xlated("10: call kernel-function")
+__xlated("11: r1 = r8")
+/* save __u64 *ctx to stack */
+__xlated("12: *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1")
+/* main prog */
+__xlated("13: r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)")
+__xlated("14: r6 = r1")
+__xlated("15: call kernel-function")
+__xlated("16: r1 = r6")
+__xlated("17: call pc+")
+/* epilogue */
+__xlated("18: r1 = 0")
+__xlated("19: call kernel-function")
+__xlated("20: if r0 != 0x0 goto pc+6")
+__xlated("21: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)")
+__xlated("22: r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)")
+__xlated("23: r6 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)")
+__xlated("24: r6 += 10000")
+__xlated("25: *(u64 *)(r1 +0) = r6")
+__xlated("26: goto pc+2")
+__xlated("27: r1 = r0")
+__xlated("28: call kernel-function")
+__xlated("29: r0 = r6")
+__xlated("30: r0 *= 2")
+__xlated("31: exit")
+SEC("struct_ops/test_pro_epilogue")
+__naked int test_kfunc_pro_epilogue(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0);"
+ "r6 = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10];"
+ "r1 = r6;"
+ "call subprog;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+__retval(1011) /* PROLOGUE_A [1000] + KFUNC_INC10 + SUBPROG_A [1] */
+int syscall_prologue(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct st_ops_args args = {};
+
+ return bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_prologue(&args);
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+__retval(20022) /* (KFUNC_INC10 + SUBPROG_A [1] + EPILOGUE_A [10000]) * 2 */
+int syscall_epilogue(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct st_ops_args args = {};
+
+ return bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_epilogue(&args);
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+__retval(22022) /* (PROLOGUE_A [1000] + KFUNC_INC10 + SUBPROG_A [1] + EPILOGUE_A [10000]) * 2 */
+int syscall_pro_epilogue(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct st_ops_args args = {};
+
+ return bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_pro_epilogue(&args);
+}
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_testmod_st_ops pro_epilogue_with_kfunc = {
+ .test_prologue = (void *)test_kfunc_prologue,
+ .test_epilogue = (void *)test_kfunc_epilogue,
+ .test_pro_epilogue = (void *)test_kfunc_pro_epilogue,
+};
@@ -1308,6 +1308,83 @@ static int bpf_test_mod_st_ops__test_pro_epilogue(struct st_ops_args *args)
return 0;
}
+static int bpf_cgroup_from_id_id;
+static int bpf_cgroup_release_id;
+
+static int st_ops_gen_prologue_with_kfunc(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, bool direct_write,
+ const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
+
+ /* r8 = r1; // r8 will be "u64 *ctx".
+ * r1 = 0;
+ * r0 = bpf_cgroup_from_id(r1);
+ * if r0 != 0 goto pc+5;
+ * r6 = r8[0]; // r6 will be "struct st_ops *args".
+ * r7 = r6->a;
+ * r7 += 1000;
+ * r6->a = r7;
+ * goto pc+2;
+ * r1 = r0;
+ * bpf_cgroup_release(r1);
+ * r1 = r8;
+ */
+ *insn++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_1);
+ *insn++ = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0);
+ *insn++ = BPF_CALL_KFUNC(0, bpf_cgroup_from_id_id);
+ *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 5);
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_8, 0);
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6, offsetof(struct st_ops_args, a));
+ *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, 1000);
+ *insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_7, offsetof(struct st_ops_args, a));
+ *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 2);
+ *insn++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0);
+ *insn++ = BPF_CALL_KFUNC(0, bpf_cgroup_release_id),
+ *insn++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_8);
+ *insn++ = prog->insnsi[0];
+
+ return insn - insn_buf;
+}
+
+static int st_ops_gen_epilogue_with_kfunc(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, const struct bpf_prog *prog,
+ s16 ctx_stack_off)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
+
+ /* r1 = 0;
+ * r0 = bpf_cgroup_from_id(r1);
+ * if r0 != 0 goto pc+6;
+ * r1 = stack[ctx_stack_off]; // r1 will be "u64 *ctx"
+ * r1 = r1[0]; // r1 will be "struct st_ops *args"
+ * r6 = r1->a;
+ * r6 += 10000;
+ * r1->a = r6;
+ * goto pc+2
+ * r1 = r0;
+ * bpf_cgroup_release(r1);
+ * r0 = r6;
+ * r0 *= 2;
+ * BPF_EXIT;
+ */
+ *insn++ = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0);
+ *insn++ = BPF_CALL_KFUNC(0, bpf_cgroup_from_id_id);
+ *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 6);
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_FP, ctx_stack_off);
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, 0);
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct st_ops_args, a));
+ *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, 10000);
+ *insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6, offsetof(struct st_ops_args, a));
+ *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 2);
+ *insn++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0);
+ *insn++ = BPF_CALL_KFUNC(0, bpf_cgroup_release_id),
+ *insn++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6);
+ *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, BPF_REG_0, 2);
+ *insn++ = BPF_EXIT_INSN();
+
+ return insn - insn_buf;
+}
+
+#define KFUNC_PRO_EPI_PREFIX "test_kfunc_"
static int st_ops_gen_prologue(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, bool direct_write,
const struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
@@ -1317,6 +1394,9 @@ static int st_ops_gen_prologue(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, bool direct_write,
strcmp(prog->aux->attach_func_name, "test_pro_epilogue"))
return 0;
+ if (!strncmp(prog->aux->name, KFUNC_PRO_EPI_PREFIX, strlen(KFUNC_PRO_EPI_PREFIX)))
+ return st_ops_gen_prologue_with_kfunc(insn_buf, direct_write, prog);
+
/* r6 = r1[0]; // r6 will be "struct st_ops *args". r1 is "u64 *ctx".
* r7 = r6->a;
* r7 += 1000;
@@ -1340,6 +1420,9 @@ static int st_ops_gen_epilogue(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, const struct bpf_prog
strcmp(prog->aux->attach_func_name, "test_pro_epilogue"))
return 0;
+ if (!strncmp(prog->aux->name, KFUNC_PRO_EPI_PREFIX, strlen(KFUNC_PRO_EPI_PREFIX)))
+ return st_ops_gen_epilogue_with_kfunc(insn_buf, prog, ctx_stack_off);
+
/* r1 = stack[ctx_stack_off]; // r1 will be "u64 *ctx"
* r1 = r1[0]; // r1 will be "struct st_ops *args"
* r6 = r1->a;
@@ -1410,6 +1493,13 @@ static void st_ops_unreg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
static int st_ops_init(struct btf *btf)
{
+ struct btf *kfunc_btf;
+
+ bpf_cgroup_from_id_id = bpf_find_btf_id("bpf_cgroup_from_id", BTF_KIND_FUNC, &kfunc_btf);
+ bpf_cgroup_release_id = bpf_find_btf_id("bpf_cgroup_release", BTF_KIND_FUNC, &kfunc_btf);
+ if (!bpf_cgroup_from_id_id || !bpf_cgroup_release_id)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
return 0;
}
Test gen_prologue and gen_epilogue that generate kfuncs that have not been seen in the main program. The main bpf program and return value checks are identical to pro_epilogue.c introduced in commit 47e69431b57a ("selftests/bpf: Test gen_prologue and gen_epilogue"). However, now when bpf_testmod_st_ops detects a program name with prefix "test_kfunc_", it generates slightly different prologue and epilogue: They still add 1000 to args->a in prologue, add 10000 to args->a and set r0 to 2 * args->a in epilogue, but involve kfuncs. At high level, the alternative version of prologue and epilogue look like this: cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(0); if (cgrp) bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp); else /* Perform what original bpf_testmod_st_ops prologue or * epilogue does */ Since 0 is never a valid cgroup id, the original prologue or epilogue logic will be performed. As a result, the __retval check should expect the exact same return value. Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com> --- kernel/bpf/btf.c | 1 + .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pro_epilogue.c | 2 + .../bpf/progs/pro_epilogue_with_kfunc.c | 182 ++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c | 90 +++++++++ 4 files changed, 275 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pro_epilogue_with_kfunc.c