diff mbox series

[v5,4/4] selftests: bpf: add missing cpumask test to runner and annotate existing tests

Message ID 20250307041738.6665-5-emil@etsalapatis.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: introduce helper for populating bpf_cpumask | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / GCC BPF / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-kernel / x86_64-gcc veristat_kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-meta / x86_64-gcc veristat_meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / GCC BPF / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / GCC BPF / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-43 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-44 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-45 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-46 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-47 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-48 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-49 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-50 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-51 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 26 (+0) this patch: 26 (+0)
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 11 maintainers not CCed: jolsa@kernel.org kpsingh@kernel.org linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org sdf@fomichev.me john.fastabend@gmail.com haoluo@google.com mykolal@fb.com houtao1@huawei.com thinker.li@gmail.com shuah@kernel.org song@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: From:/Signed-off-by: email comments mismatch: 'From: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>' != 'Signed-off-by: Emil Tsalapatis (Meta) <emil@etsalapatis.com>'
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Emil Tsalapatis March 7, 2025, 4:17 a.m. UTC 
The BPF cpumask selftests are supposed to be run twice, once to ensure
that they load properly and once to actually test their behavior. The
load test is triggered by annotating the tests with __success, while the
run test needs adding to tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
the name of the new test. However, most existing tests are missing the
__success annotation, and test_refcount_null_tracking is missing from the
main test file. Add the missing annotations and test name.

Signed-off-by: Emil Tsalapatis (Meta) <emil@etsalapatis.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c |  1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c      | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)

Comments

Hou Tao March 7, 2025, 11:51 a.m. UTC | #1 
Hi,

On 3/7/2025 12:17 PM, Emil Tsalapatis wrote:
> The BPF cpumask selftests are supposed to be run twice, once to ensure
> that they load properly and once to actually test their behavior. The
> load test is triggered by annotating the tests with __success, while the
> run test needs adding to tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
> the name of the new test. However, most existing tests are missing the
> __success annotation, and test_refcount_null_tracking is missing from the
> main test file. Add the missing annotations and test name.

It seems I have misled you. There is no need to run these programs
twice. __success() is used to annotate the test cases which will be run
through RUN_TESTS() macros. RUN_TESTS() will run these programs directly
through bpf_prog_test_run_opts(). However only specific program types
support being run through bpf_prog_test_run_opts(), and tp_btf doesn't
support being run through bpf_prog_test_run_opts(). Considering that
multiple successful test cases use err to check whether there is any
error during the running of program, I suggest only add
test_refcount_null_tracking in cpumask_success_testcases and remove the
__success annotation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emil Tsalapatis (Meta) <emil@etsalapatis.com>
> ---
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c |  1 +
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c      | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
> index 9b09beba988b..447a6e362fcd 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ static const char * const cpumask_success_testcases[] = {
>  	"test_global_mask_nested_deep_rcu",
>  	"test_global_mask_nested_deep_array_rcu",
>  	"test_cpumask_weight",
> +	"test_refcount_null_tracking",
>  	"test_populate_reject_small_mask",
>  	"test_populate_reject_unaligned",
>  	"test_populate",
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
> index 51f3dcf8869f..8abae7a59f92 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
> @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ static bool create_cpumask_set(struct bpf_cpumask **out1,
>  }
>  
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_alloc_free_cpumask, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask;
> @@ -152,6 +153,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_alloc_free_cpumask, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  }
>  
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_set_clear_cpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask;
> @@ -181,6 +183,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_set_clear_cpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  }
>  
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_setall_clear_cpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask;
> @@ -210,6 +213,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_setall_clear_cpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  }
>  
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_first_firstzero_cpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask;
> @@ -249,6 +253,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_first_firstzero_cpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags
>  }
>  
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_firstand_nocpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_cpumask *mask1, *mask2;
> @@ -281,6 +286,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_firstand_nocpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  }
>  
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_test_and_set_clear, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask;
> @@ -313,6 +319,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_test_and_set_clear, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  }
>  
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_and_or_xor, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_cpumask *mask1, *mask2, *dst1, *dst2;
> @@ -360,6 +367,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_and_or_xor, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  }
>  
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_intersects_subset, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_cpumask *mask1, *mask2, *dst1, *dst2;
> @@ -402,6 +410,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_intersects_subset, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  }
>  
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_copy_any_anyand, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_cpumask *mask1, *mask2, *dst1, *dst2;
> @@ -456,6 +465,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_copy_any_anyand, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  }
>  
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_insert_leave, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask;
> @@ -471,6 +481,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_insert_leave, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  }
>  
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_insert_remove_release, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask;
> @@ -501,6 +512,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_insert_remove_release, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_fla
>  }
>  
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_cpumask *local, *prev;
> @@ -534,6 +546,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  }
>  
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_array_one_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_cpumask *local, *prev;
> @@ -632,12 +645,14 @@ static int _global_mask_array_rcu(struct bpf_cpumask **mask0,
>  }
>  
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_array_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	return _global_mask_array_rcu(&global_mask_array[0], &global_mask_array[1]);
>  }
>  
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_array_l2_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	return _global_mask_array_rcu(&global_mask_array_l2[0][0], &global_mask_array_l2[1][0]);
> @@ -670,6 +685,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_nested_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_fl
>   * incorrect offset.
>   */
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_nested_deep_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	int r, i;
> @@ -689,6 +705,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_nested_deep_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clo
>  }
>  
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_nested_deep_array_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	int i;
> @@ -706,6 +723,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_nested_deep_array_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u
>  }
>  
>  SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> +__success
>  int BPF_PROG(test_cpumask_weight, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_cpumask *local;
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
index 9b09beba988b..447a6e362fcd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@  static const char * const cpumask_success_testcases[] = {
 	"test_global_mask_nested_deep_rcu",
 	"test_global_mask_nested_deep_array_rcu",
 	"test_cpumask_weight",
+	"test_refcount_null_tracking",
 	"test_populate_reject_small_mask",
 	"test_populate_reject_unaligned",
 	"test_populate",
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
index 51f3dcf8869f..8abae7a59f92 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@  static bool create_cpumask_set(struct bpf_cpumask **out1,
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_alloc_free_cpumask, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask;
@@ -152,6 +153,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_alloc_free_cpumask, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_set_clear_cpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask;
@@ -181,6 +183,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_set_clear_cpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_setall_clear_cpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask;
@@ -210,6 +213,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_setall_clear_cpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_first_firstzero_cpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask;
@@ -249,6 +253,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_first_firstzero_cpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_firstand_nocpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct bpf_cpumask *mask1, *mask2;
@@ -281,6 +286,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_firstand_nocpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_test_and_set_clear, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask;
@@ -313,6 +319,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_test_and_set_clear, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_and_or_xor, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct bpf_cpumask *mask1, *mask2, *dst1, *dst2;
@@ -360,6 +367,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_and_or_xor, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_intersects_subset, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct bpf_cpumask *mask1, *mask2, *dst1, *dst2;
@@ -402,6 +410,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_intersects_subset, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_copy_any_anyand, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct bpf_cpumask *mask1, *mask2, *dst1, *dst2;
@@ -456,6 +465,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_copy_any_anyand, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_insert_leave, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask;
@@ -471,6 +481,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_insert_leave, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_insert_remove_release, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask;
@@ -501,6 +512,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_insert_remove_release, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_fla
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct bpf_cpumask *local, *prev;
@@ -534,6 +546,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_array_one_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct bpf_cpumask *local, *prev;
@@ -632,12 +645,14 @@  static int _global_mask_array_rcu(struct bpf_cpumask **mask0,
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_array_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	return _global_mask_array_rcu(&global_mask_array[0], &global_mask_array[1]);
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_array_l2_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	return _global_mask_array_rcu(&global_mask_array_l2[0][0], &global_mask_array_l2[1][0]);
@@ -670,6 +685,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_nested_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_fl
  * incorrect offset.
  */
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_nested_deep_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	int r, i;
@@ -689,6 +705,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_nested_deep_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clo
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_nested_deep_array_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	int i;
@@ -706,6 +723,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_nested_deep_array_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
 int BPF_PROG(test_cpumask_weight, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct bpf_cpumask *local;