diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2,6/6] selftests/bpf: Add test case for atomic update of fd htab

Message ID 20250308135110.953269-7-houtao@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Support atomic update for htab of maps | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 26 (+0) this patch: 26 (+0)
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 3 maintainers not CCed: mykolal@fb.com shuah@kernel.org linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1 this patch: 1
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: Macro argument 'err' may be better as '(err)' to avoid precedence issues WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? WARNING: line length of 83 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 87 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 91 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / GCC BPF / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-kernel / x86_64-gcc veristat_kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-meta / x86_64-gcc veristat_meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / GCC BPF / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / GCC BPF / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-43 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-44 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-50 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-51 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-45 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-46 fail Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-49 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-47 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-48 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Hou Tao March 8, 2025, 1:51 p.m. UTC
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>

Add a test case to verify the atomic update of existing elements in the
htab of maps. The test proceeds in three steps:

1) fill the outer map with keys in the range [0, 8]
For each inner array map, the value of its first element is set as the
key used to lookup the inner map.

2) create 16 threads to lookup these keys concurrently
Each lookup thread first lookups the inner map, then it checks whether
the first value of the inner array map is the same as the key used to
lookup the inner map.

3) create 8 threads to overwrite these keys concurrently
Each update thread first creates an inner array, it sets the first value
of the array to the key used to update the outer map, then it uses the
key and the inner map to update the outer map.

Without atomic update support, the lookup operation may return -ENOENT
during the lookup of outer map, or return -EINVAL during the comparison
of the first value in the inner map and the key used for inner map, and
the test will fail. After the atomic update change, both the lookup and
the comparison will succeed.

Given that the update of outer map is slow, the test case sets the loop
number for each thread as 5 to reduce the total running time. However,
the loop number could also be adjusted through FD_HTAB_LOOP_NR
environment variable.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fd_htab_lookup.c | 192 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/fd_htab_lookup.c      |  25 +++
 2 files changed, 217 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fd_htab_lookup.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fd_htab_lookup.c
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fd_htab_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fd_htab_lookup.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..ca46fdd6e1ae7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fd_htab_lookup.c
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (C) 2025. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd */
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "fd_htab_lookup.skel.h"
+
+struct htab_op_ctx {
+	int fd;
+	int loop;
+	unsigned int entries;
+	bool stop;
+};
+
+#define ERR_TO_RETVAL(where, err) ((void *)(long)(((where) << 12) | (-err)))
+
+static void *htab_lookup_fn(void *arg)
+{
+	struct htab_op_ctx *ctx = arg;
+	int i = 0;
+
+	while (i++ < ctx->loop && !ctx->stop) {
+		unsigned int j;
+
+		for (j = 0; j < ctx->entries; j++) {
+			unsigned int key = j, zero = 0, value;
+			int inner_fd, err;
+
+			err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(ctx->fd, &key, &value);
+			if (err) {
+				ctx->stop = true;
+				return ERR_TO_RETVAL(1, err);
+			}
+
+			inner_fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(value);
+			if (inner_fd < 0) {
+				/* The old map has been freed */
+				if (inner_fd == -ENOENT)
+					continue;
+				ctx->stop = true;
+				return ERR_TO_RETVAL(2, inner_fd);
+			}
+
+			err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(inner_fd, &zero, &value);
+			if (err) {
+				close(inner_fd);
+				ctx->stop = true;
+				return ERR_TO_RETVAL(3, err);
+			}
+			close(inner_fd);
+
+			if (value != key) {
+				ctx->stop = true;
+				return ERR_TO_RETVAL(4, -EINVAL);
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static void *htab_update_fn(void *arg)
+{
+	struct htab_op_ctx *ctx = arg;
+	int i = 0;
+
+	while (i++ < ctx->loop && !ctx->stop) {
+		unsigned int j;
+
+		for (j = 0; j < ctx->entries; j++) {
+			unsigned int key = j, zero = 0;
+			int inner_fd, err;
+
+			inner_fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, NULL, 4, 4, 1, NULL);
+			if (inner_fd < 0) {
+				ctx->stop = true;
+				return ERR_TO_RETVAL(1, inner_fd);
+			}
+
+			err = bpf_map_update_elem(inner_fd, &zero, &key, 0);
+			if (err) {
+				close(inner_fd);
+				ctx->stop = true;
+				return ERR_TO_RETVAL(2, err);
+			}
+
+			err = bpf_map_update_elem(ctx->fd, &key, &inner_fd, BPF_EXIST);
+			if (err) {
+				close(inner_fd);
+				ctx->stop = true;
+				return ERR_TO_RETVAL(3, err);
+			}
+			close(inner_fd);
+		}
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static int setup_htab(int fd, unsigned int entries)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < entries; i++) {
+		unsigned int key = i, zero = 0;
+		int inner_fd, err;
+
+		inner_fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, NULL, 4, 4, 1, NULL);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(inner_fd, "new array"))
+			return -1;
+
+		err = bpf_map_update_elem(inner_fd, &zero, &key, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "init array")) {
+			close(inner_fd);
+			return -1;
+		}
+
+		err = bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &key, &inner_fd, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "init outer")) {
+			close(inner_fd);
+			return -1;
+		}
+		close(inner_fd);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int get_int_from_env(const char *name, int dft)
+{
+	const char *value;
+
+	value = getenv(name);
+	if (!value)
+		return dft;
+
+	return atoi(value);
+}
+
+void test_fd_htab_lookup(void)
+{
+	unsigned int i, wr_nr = 8, rd_nr = 16;
+	pthread_t tids[wr_nr + rd_nr];
+	struct fd_htab_lookup *skel;
+	struct htab_op_ctx ctx;
+	int err;
+
+	skel = fd_htab_lookup__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "fd_htab_lookup__open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	ctx.fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_map);
+	ctx.loop = get_int_from_env("FD_HTAB_LOOP_NR", 5);
+	ctx.stop = false;
+	ctx.entries = 8;
+
+	err = setup_htab(ctx.fd, ctx.entries);
+	if (err)
+		goto destroy;
+
+	memset(tids, 0, sizeof(tids));
+	for (i = 0; i < wr_nr; i++) {
+		err = pthread_create(&tids[i], NULL, htab_update_fn, &ctx);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "pthread_create")) {
+			ctx.stop = true;
+			goto reap;
+		}
+	}
+	for (i = 0; i < rd_nr; i++) {
+		err = pthread_create(&tids[i + wr_nr], NULL, htab_lookup_fn, &ctx);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "pthread_create")) {
+			ctx.stop = true;
+			goto reap;
+		}
+	}
+
+reap:
+	for (i = 0; i < wr_nr + rd_nr; i++) {
+		void *ret = NULL;
+		char desc[32];
+
+		if (!tids[i])
+			continue;
+
+		snprintf(desc, sizeof(desc), "thread %u", i + 1);
+		err = pthread_join(tids[i], &ret);
+		ASSERT_OK(err, desc);
+		ASSERT_EQ(ret, NULL, desc);
+	}
+destroy:
+	fd_htab_lookup__destroy(skel);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fd_htab_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fd_htab_lookup.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..a4a9e1db626fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fd_htab_lookup.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (C) 2025. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd */
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+struct inner_map_type {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+	__uint(key_size, 4);
+	__uint(value_size, 4);
+	__uint(max_entries, 1);
+} inner_map SEC(".maps");
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS);
+	__uint(max_entries, 64);
+	__type(key, int);
+	__type(value, int);
+	__array(values, struct inner_map_type);
+} outer_map SEC(".maps") = {
+	.values = {
+		[0] = &inner_map,
+	},
+};