diff mbox series

[v3,bpf-next,3/3] selftests/bpf: Add test for attaching kprobe with long event names

Message ID 20250414093402.384872-4-yangfeng59949@163.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series libbpf: Fix event name too long error and add tests | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
netdev/series_format warning Series does not have a cover letter
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 26 (+2) this patch: 26 (+2)
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 9 maintainers not CCed: mykolal@fb.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org linux@jordanrome.com yangfeng@kylinos.cn linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com shuah@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: No space is necessary after a cast WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-43 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-44 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-49 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-50 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-51 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / GCC BPF / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-kernel / x86_64-gcc veristat_kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-meta / x86_64-gcc veristat_meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / GCC BPF / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / GCC BPF / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-45 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-46 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-47 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-48 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Feng Yang April 14, 2025, 9:34 a.m. UTC 
From: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>

This test verifies that attaching kprobe/kretprobe with long event names
does not trigger EINVAL errors.

Signed-off-by: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c   | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c    |  5 +++
 .../bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h        |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)

Comments

Jiri Olsa April 14, 2025, 11:47 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 05:34:02PM +0800, Feng Yang wrote:
> From: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
> 
> This test verifies that attaching kprobe/kretprobe with long event names
> does not trigger EINVAL errors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c   | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c    |  5 +++
>  .../bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h        |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> index 9b7f36f39c32..633b5eb4379b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> @@ -168,6 +168,39 @@ static void test_attach_uprobe_long_event_name(void)
>  	test_attach_probe_manual__destroy(skel);
>  }
>  
> +/* attach kprobe/kretprobe long event name testings */
> +static void test_attach_kprobe_long_event_name(void)
> +{
> +	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_opts, kprobe_opts);
> +	struct bpf_link *kprobe_link, *kretprobe_link;
> +	struct test_attach_probe_manual *skel;
> +
> +	skel = test_attach_probe_manual__open_and_load();
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_kprobe_manual_open_and_load"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	/* manual-attach kprobe/kretprobe */
> +	kprobe_opts.attach_mode = PROBE_ATTACH_MODE_LEGACY;
> +	kprobe_opts.retprobe = false;
> +	kprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(skel->progs.handle_kprobe,
> +						      "bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name",
> +						      &kprobe_opts);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(kprobe_link, "attach_kprobe_long_event_name"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	skel->links.handle_kprobe = kprobe_link;
> +
> +	kprobe_opts.retprobe = true;
> +	kretprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(skel->progs.handle_kretprobe,
> +							 "bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name",
> +							 &kprobe_opts);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(kretprobe_link, "attach_kretprobe_long_event_name"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	skel->links.handle_kretprobe = kretprobe_link;
> +
> +cleanup:
> +	test_attach_probe_manual__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
>  static void test_attach_probe_auto(struct test_attach_probe *skel)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_link *uprobe_err_link;
> @@ -371,6 +404,8 @@ void test_attach_probe(void)
>  
>  	if (test__start_subtest("uprobe-long_name"))
>  		test_attach_uprobe_long_event_name();
> +	if (test__start_subtest("kprobe-long_name"))
> +		test_attach_kprobe_long_event_name();
>  
>  cleanup:
>  	test_attach_probe__destroy(skel);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
> index f38eaf0d35ef..439f6c2b2456 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
> @@ -1053,6 +1053,10 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10(struct st_ops_args *args)
>  	return args->a;
>  }
>  
> +__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name(void)
> +{
> +}

does it need to be a kfunc? IIUC it just needs to be a normal kernel/module function

jirka


> +
>  BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids)
>  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc)
>  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test1)
> @@ -1093,6 +1097,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_prologue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABL
>  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_epilogue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABLE)
>  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_pro_epilogue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABLE)
>  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
> +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name)
>  BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids)
>  
>  static int bpf_testmod_ops_init(struct btf *btf)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
> index b58817938deb..e5b833140418 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
> @@ -159,4 +159,6 @@ void bpf_kfunc_trusted_task_test(struct task_struct *ptr) __ksym;
>  void bpf_kfunc_trusted_num_test(int *ptr) __ksym;
>  void bpf_kfunc_rcu_task_test(struct task_struct *ptr) __ksym;
>  
> +void bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name(void) __ksym;
> +
>  #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_KFUNC_H */
> -- 
> 2.43.0
>
Feng Yang April 15, 2025, 2:52 a.m. UTC | #2 
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:47:55 +0200, Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 05:34:02PM +0800, Feng Yang wrote:
> > From: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
> > 
> > This test verifies that attaching kprobe/kretprobe with long event names
> > does not trigger EINVAL errors.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
> > ---
> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c   | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c    |  5 +++
> >  .../bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h        |  2 ++
> >  3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> > index 9b7f36f39c32..633b5eb4379b 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> > @@ -168,6 +168,39 @@ static void test_attach_uprobe_long_event_name(void)
> >  	test_attach_probe_manual__destroy(skel);
> >  }
> >  
> > +/* attach kprobe/kretprobe long event name testings */
> > +static void test_attach_kprobe_long_event_name(void)
> > +{
> > +	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_opts, kprobe_opts);
> > +	struct bpf_link *kprobe_link, *kretprobe_link;
> > +	struct test_attach_probe_manual *skel;
> > +
> > +	skel = test_attach_probe_manual__open_and_load();
> > +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_kprobe_manual_open_and_load"))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	/* manual-attach kprobe/kretprobe */
> > +	kprobe_opts.attach_mode = PROBE_ATTACH_MODE_LEGACY;
> > +	kprobe_opts.retprobe = false;
> > +	kprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(skel->progs.handle_kprobe,
> > +						      "bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name",
> > +						      &kprobe_opts);
> > +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(kprobe_link, "attach_kprobe_long_event_name"))
> > +		goto cleanup;
> > +	skel->links.handle_kprobe = kprobe_link;
> > +
> > +	kprobe_opts.retprobe = true;
> > +	kretprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(skel->progs.handle_kretprobe,
> > +							 "bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name",
> > +							 &kprobe_opts);
> > +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(kretprobe_link, "attach_kretprobe_long_event_name"))
> > +		goto cleanup;
> > +	skel->links.handle_kretprobe = kretprobe_link;
> > +
> > +cleanup:
> > +	test_attach_probe_manual__destroy(skel);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void test_attach_probe_auto(struct test_attach_probe *skel)
> >  {
> >  	struct bpf_link *uprobe_err_link;
> > @@ -371,6 +404,8 @@ void test_attach_probe(void)
> >  
> >  	if (test__start_subtest("uprobe-long_name"))
> >  		test_attach_uprobe_long_event_name();
> > +	if (test__start_subtest("kprobe-long_name"))
> > +		test_attach_kprobe_long_event_name();
> >  
> >  cleanup:
> >  	test_attach_probe__destroy(skel);
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
> > index f38eaf0d35ef..439f6c2b2456 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
> > @@ -1053,6 +1053,10 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10(struct st_ops_args *args)
> >  	return args->a;
> >  }
> >  
> > +__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name(void)
> > +{
> > +}
> 
> does it need to be a kfunc? IIUC it just needs to be a normal kernel/module function
> 
> jirka
> 

Indeed, so is it okay if I make the following modifications:

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -134,6 +134,10 @@ bpf_testmod_test_arg_ptr_to_struct(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_1 *a) {
 	return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
 }
 
+noinline void bpf_testmod_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name(void)
+{
+}
+
 __bpf_kfunc void
 bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc(int i)

Thanks.

> > +
> >  BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids)
> >  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc)
> >  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test1)
> > @@ -1093,6 +1097,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_prologue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABL
> >  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_epilogue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABLE)
> >  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_pro_epilogue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABLE)
> >  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
> > +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name)
> >  BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids)
> >  
> >  static int bpf_testmod_ops_init(struct btf *btf)
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
> > index b58817938deb..e5b833140418 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
> > @@ -159,4 +159,6 @@ void bpf_kfunc_trusted_task_test(struct task_struct *ptr) __ksym;
> >  void bpf_kfunc_trusted_num_test(int *ptr) __ksym;
> >  void bpf_kfunc_rcu_task_test(struct task_struct *ptr) __ksym;
> >  
> > +void bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name(void) __ksym;
> > +
> >  #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_KFUNC_H */
> > -- 
> > 2.43.0
> >
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
index 9b7f36f39c32..633b5eb4379b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
@@ -168,6 +168,39 @@  static void test_attach_uprobe_long_event_name(void)
 	test_attach_probe_manual__destroy(skel);
 }
 
+/* attach kprobe/kretprobe long event name testings */
+static void test_attach_kprobe_long_event_name(void)
+{
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_opts, kprobe_opts);
+	struct bpf_link *kprobe_link, *kretprobe_link;
+	struct test_attach_probe_manual *skel;
+
+	skel = test_attach_probe_manual__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_kprobe_manual_open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	/* manual-attach kprobe/kretprobe */
+	kprobe_opts.attach_mode = PROBE_ATTACH_MODE_LEGACY;
+	kprobe_opts.retprobe = false;
+	kprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(skel->progs.handle_kprobe,
+						      "bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name",
+						      &kprobe_opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(kprobe_link, "attach_kprobe_long_event_name"))
+		goto cleanup;
+	skel->links.handle_kprobe = kprobe_link;
+
+	kprobe_opts.retprobe = true;
+	kretprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(skel->progs.handle_kretprobe,
+							 "bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name",
+							 &kprobe_opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(kretprobe_link, "attach_kretprobe_long_event_name"))
+		goto cleanup;
+	skel->links.handle_kretprobe = kretprobe_link;
+
+cleanup:
+	test_attach_probe_manual__destroy(skel);
+}
+
 static void test_attach_probe_auto(struct test_attach_probe *skel)
 {
 	struct bpf_link *uprobe_err_link;
@@ -371,6 +404,8 @@  void test_attach_probe(void)
 
 	if (test__start_subtest("uprobe-long_name"))
 		test_attach_uprobe_long_event_name();
+	if (test__start_subtest("kprobe-long_name"))
+		test_attach_kprobe_long_event_name();
 
 cleanup:
 	test_attach_probe__destroy(skel);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
index f38eaf0d35ef..439f6c2b2456 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -1053,6 +1053,10 @@  __bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10(struct st_ops_args *args)
 	return args->a;
 }
 
+__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name(void)
+{
+}
+
 BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test1)
@@ -1093,6 +1097,7 @@  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_prologue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABL
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_epilogue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABLE)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_pro_epilogue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABLE)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name)
 BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids)
 
 static int bpf_testmod_ops_init(struct btf *btf)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
index b58817938deb..e5b833140418 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
@@ -159,4 +159,6 @@  void bpf_kfunc_trusted_task_test(struct task_struct *ptr) __ksym;
 void bpf_kfunc_trusted_num_test(int *ptr) __ksym;
 void bpf_kfunc_rcu_task_test(struct task_struct *ptr) __ksym;
 
+void bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name(void) __ksym;
+
 #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_KFUNC_H */