diff mbox series

can: rcar: Drop unneeded ARM dependency

Message ID 362d9ced19f3524ee8917df5681b3880c13cac85.1630416373.git.geert+renesas@glider.be (mailing list archive)
State Awaiting Upstream
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series can: rcar: Drop unneeded ARM dependency | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Series ignored based on subject

Commit Message

Geert Uytterhoeven Aug. 31, 2021, 1:27 p.m. UTC
The dependency on ARM predates the dependency on ARCH_RENESAS.
The latter was introduced for Renesas arm64 SoCs first, and later
extended to cover Renesas ARM SoCs, too.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
---
 drivers/net/can/rcar/Kconfig | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Marc Kleine-Budde Aug. 31, 2021, 1:32 p.m. UTC | #1
On 31.08.2021 15:27:40, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The dependency on ARM predates the dependency on ARCH_RENESAS.
> The latter was introduced for Renesas arm64 SoCs first, and later
> extended to cover Renesas ARM SoCs, too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Applied to linux-can-next/testing.

regards,
Marc
Geert Uytterhoeven Oct. 18, 2021, 11:34 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Marc,

On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 3:32 PM Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> On 31.08.2021 15:27:40, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > The dependency on ARM predates the dependency on ARCH_RENESAS.
> > The latter was introduced for Renesas arm64 SoCs first, and later
> > extended to cover Renesas ARM SoCs, too.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>
> Applied to linux-can-next/testing.

Thanks!

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can-next.git/log/?h=testing
still predates my patch. Am I looking at the wrong tree?

Thanks again!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
Marc Kleine-Budde Oct. 18, 2021, 11:48 a.m. UTC | #3
On 18.10.2021 13:34:34, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 3:32 PM Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > On 31.08.2021 15:27:40, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > The dependency on ARM predates the dependency on ARCH_RENESAS.
> > > The latter was introduced for Renesas arm64 SoCs first, and later
> > > extended to cover Renesas ARM SoCs, too.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> >
> > Applied to linux-can-next/testing.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can-next.git/log/?h=testing
> still predates my patch. Am I looking at the wrong tree?

I've just updated the branch.

I'm working on can-next patches while waiting on other things, and I'm
not finished yet, so I haven't pushed it until now. More updates and
probably rebases will be done to the testing branch.

Regards,
Marc
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/Kconfig b/drivers/net/can/rcar/Kconfig
index 56320a7f828b6684..c66762ef631b0871 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/Kconfig
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ 
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 config CAN_RCAR
 	tristate "Renesas R-Car and RZ/G CAN controller"
-	depends on ARCH_RENESAS || ARM || COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST
 	help
 	  Say Y here if you want to use CAN controller found on Renesas R-Car
 	  or RZ/G SoCs.
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@  config CAN_RCAR
 
 config CAN_RCAR_CANFD
 	tristate "Renesas R-Car CAN FD controller"
-	depends on ARCH_RENESAS || ARM || COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST
 	help
 	  Say Y here if you want to use CAN FD controller found on
 	  Renesas R-Car SoCs. The driver puts the controller in CAN FD only