diff mbox series

[v1,08/10] powerpc/bpf/32: Optimise some particular const operations

Message ID 3dce3db8a490a053b5e0bf11ddaa6665f95422c1.1669881248.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [v1,01/10] powerpc/bpf/32: Fix Oops on tail call tests | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Not a local patch
bpf/vmtest-bpf-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-7 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-14 fail Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-15 fail Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-16 fail Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-17 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-18 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-19 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-20 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-21 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-22 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-23 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-36 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-37 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-38 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16

Commit Message

Christophe Leroy Dec. 1, 2022, 7:56 a.m. UTC 
Simplify multiplications and divisions with constants when the
constant is 1 or -1.

When the constant is a power of 2, replace them by bit shits.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 6c45d953d4e8..e6e156c0c5d6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -391,7 +391,13 @@  int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
 			EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULW(dst_reg, dst_reg, src_reg));
 			break;
 		case BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_K: /* (u32) dst *= (u32) imm */
-			if (imm >= -32768 && imm < 32768) {
+			if (imm == 1)
+				break;
+			if (imm == -1) {
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUBFIC(dst_reg, dst_reg, 0));
+			} else if (is_power_of_2((u32)imm)) {
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_SLWI(dst_reg, dst_reg, ilog2(imm)));
+			} else if (imm >= -32768 && imm < 32768) {
 				EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULI(dst_reg, dst_reg, imm));
 			} else {
 				PPC_LI32(_R0, imm);
@@ -411,6 +417,13 @@  int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
 				EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUBFZE(dst_reg_h, dst_reg_h));
 				break;
 			}
+			if (imm > 0 && is_power_of_2(imm)) {
+				imm = ilog2(imm);
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM(dst_reg_h, dst_reg_h, imm, 0, 31 - imm));
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWIMI(dst_reg_h, dst_reg, imm, 32 - imm, 31));
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_SLWI(dst_reg, dst_reg, imm));
+				break;
+			}
 			bpf_set_seen_register(ctx, tmp_reg);
 			PPC_LI32(tmp_reg, imm);
 			EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULW(dst_reg_h, dst_reg_h, tmp_reg));
@@ -438,8 +451,12 @@  int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
 			if (imm == 1)
 				break;
 
-			PPC_LI32(_R0, imm);
-			EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVWU(dst_reg, dst_reg, _R0));
+			if (is_power_of_2((u32)imm)) {
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_SRWI(dst_reg, dst_reg, ilog2(imm)));
+			} else {
+				PPC_LI32(_R0, imm);
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVWU(dst_reg, dst_reg, _R0));
+			}
 			break;
 		case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_K: /* (u32) dst %= (u32) imm */
 			if (!imm)