diff mbox series

[bpf-next] docs, bpf: Ensure IETF's BPF mailing list gets copied for ISA doc changes

Message ID 57619c0dd8e354d82bf38745f99405e3babdc970.1676068387.git.daniel@iogearbox.net (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 7e2a9ebe8126206157056cca5dd30a656f3d8a81
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next] docs, bpf: Ensure IETF's BPF mailing list gets copied for ISA doc changes | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 fail Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on s390x with gcc
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 1 of 1 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 12 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16

Commit Message

Daniel Borkmann Feb. 10, 2023, 10:40 p.m. UTC
Given BPF is increasingly being used beyond just the Linux kernel, with
implementations in NICs and other hardware, Windows, etc, there is an
ongoing effort to document and standardize parts of the existing BPF
infrastructure such as its ISA. As "source of truth" we decided some
time ago to rely on the in-tree documentation, in particular, starting
out with the Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst as a base for later
RFC drafts on the ISA. Therefore, we want to ensure that changes to that
document have bpf@ietf.org in Cc, so add a MAINTAINERS file entry with
a section on documents related to standardization efforts. For now, this
only relates to instruction-set.rst, and later additional files will be
added.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Cc: bpf@ietf.org
Link: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bofreq-thaler-bpf-ebpf/
---
 MAINTAINERS | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Feb. 11, 2023, 3 a.m. UTC | #1
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 23:40:31 +0100 you wrote:
> Given BPF is increasingly being used beyond just the Linux kernel, with
> implementations in NICs and other hardware, Windows, etc, there is an
> ongoing effort to document and standardize parts of the existing BPF
> infrastructure such as its ISA. As "source of truth" we decided some
> time ago to rely on the in-tree documentation, in particular, starting
> out with the Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst as a base for later
> RFC drafts on the ISA. Therefore, we want to ensure that changes to that
> document have bpf@ietf.org in Cc, so add a MAINTAINERS file entry with
> a section on documents related to standardization efforts. For now, this
> only relates to instruction-set.rst, and later additional files will be
> added.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] docs, bpf: Ensure IETF's BPF mailing list gets copied for ISA doc changes
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7e2a9ebe8126

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index cb30e6b85b57..4741063eaf52 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -4019,6 +4019,12 @@  L:	bpf@vger.kernel.org
 S:	Maintained
 F:	tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
 
+BPF [DOCUMENTATION] (Related to Standardization)
+L:	bpf@vger.kernel.org
+L:	bpf@ietf.org
+S:	Maintained
+F:	Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
+
 BPF [MISC]
 L:	bpf@vger.kernel.org
 S:	Odd Fixes