diff mbox series

[xfrm-next,v7,8/8] xfrm: document IPsec packet offload mode

Message ID 582d8f57e2faa56ba06ff24701413aa8c397be06.1667997522.git.leonro@nvidia.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series Extend XFRM core to allow packet offload configuration | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 3 maintainers not CCed: corbet@lwn.net pabeni@redhat.com linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 118 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Leon Romanovsky Nov. 9, 2022, 12:54 p.m. UTC
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>

Extend XFRM device offload API description with newly
added packet offload mode.

Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
---
 Documentation/networking/xfrm_device.rst | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Steffen Klassert Nov. 17, 2022, 12:15 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 02:54:36PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> 
>  
> +and for packetoffload

Maybe better 'packet offload'

>  
> +Full offload mode:

This is now 'Packet offload mode'
Leon Romanovsky Nov. 17, 2022, 12:33 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 01:15:44PM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 02:54:36PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > 
> >  
> > +and for packetoffload
> 
> Maybe better 'packet offload'
> 
> >  
> > +Full offload mode:
> 
> This is now 'Packet offload mode'


I'll fix.

Thanks
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/networking/xfrm_device.rst b/Documentation/networking/xfrm_device.rst
index 01391dfd37d9..40ea565812f6 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/xfrm_device.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/xfrm_device.rst
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@  XFRM device - offloading the IPsec computations
 ===============================================
 
 Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@oracle.com>
+Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
 
 
 Overview
@@ -18,10 +19,21 @@  can radically increase throughput and decrease CPU utilization.  The XFRM
 Device interface allows NIC drivers to offer to the stack access to the
 hardware offload.
 
+Right now, there are two types of hardware offload that kernel supports.
+ * IPsec crypto offload:
+   * NIC performs encrypt/decrypt
+   * Kernel does everything else
+ * IPsec packet offload:
+   * NIC performs encrypt/decrypt
+   * NIC does encapsulation
+   * Kernel and NIC have SA and policy in-sync
+   * NIC handles the SA and policies states
+   * The Kernel talks to the keymanager
+
 Userland access to the offload is typically through a system such as
 libreswan or KAME/raccoon, but the iproute2 'ip xfrm' command set can
 be handy when experimenting.  An example command might look something
-like this::
+like this for crypto offload:
 
   ip x s add proto esp dst 14.0.0.70 src 14.0.0.52 spi 0x07 mode transport \
      reqid 0x07 replay-window 32 \
@@ -29,6 +41,17 @@  like this::
      sel src 14.0.0.52/24 dst 14.0.0.70/24 proto tcp \
      offload dev eth4 dir in
 
+and for packetoffload
+
+  ip x s add proto esp dst 14.0.0.70 src 14.0.0.52 spi 0x07 mode transport \
+     reqid 0x07 replay-window 32 \
+     aead 'rfc4106(gcm(aes))' 0x44434241343332312423222114131211f4f3f2f1 128 \
+     sel src 14.0.0.52/24 dst 14.0.0.70/24 proto tcp \
+     offload packet dev eth4 dir in
+
+  ip x p add src 14.0.0.70 dst 14.0.0.52 offload packet dev eth4 dir in
+  tmpl src 14.0.0.70 dst 14.0.0.52 proto esp reqid 10000 mode transport
+
 Yes, that's ugly, but that's what shell scripts and/or libreswan are for.
 
 
@@ -40,17 +63,24 @@  Callbacks to implement
 
   /* from include/linux/netdevice.h */
   struct xfrmdev_ops {
+        /* Crypto and Full offload callbacks */
 	int	(*xdo_dev_state_add) (struct xfrm_state *x);
 	void	(*xdo_dev_state_delete) (struct xfrm_state *x);
 	void	(*xdo_dev_state_free) (struct xfrm_state *x);
 	bool	(*xdo_dev_offload_ok) (struct sk_buff *skb,
 				       struct xfrm_state *x);
 	void    (*xdo_dev_state_advance_esn) (struct xfrm_state *x);
+
+        /* Solely packet offload callbacks */
+	void    (*xdo_dev_state_update_curlft) (struct xfrm_state *x);
+	int	(*xdo_dev_policy_add) (struct xfrm_policy *x);
+	void	(*xdo_dev_policy_delete) (struct xfrm_policy *x);
+	void	(*xdo_dev_policy_free) (struct xfrm_policy *x);
   };
 
-The NIC driver offering ipsec offload will need to implement these
-callbacks to make the offload available to the network stack's
-XFRM subsystem.  Additionally, the feature bits NETIF_F_HW_ESP and
+The NIC driver offering ipsec offload will need to implement callbacks
+relevant to supported offload to make the offload available to the network
+stack's XFRM subsystem. Additionally, the feature bits NETIF_F_HW_ESP and
 NETIF_F_HW_ESP_TX_CSUM will signal the availability of the offload.
 
 
@@ -79,7 +109,8 @@  and an indication of whether it is for Rx or Tx.  The driver should
 
 		===========   ===================================
 		0             success
-		-EOPNETSUPP   offload not supported, try SW IPsec
+		-EOPNETSUPP   offload not supported, try SW IPsec,
+                              not applicable for packet offload mode
 		other         fail the request
 		===========   ===================================
 
@@ -96,6 +127,7 @@  will serviceable.  This can check the packet information to be sure the
 offload can be supported (e.g. IPv4 or IPv6, no IPv4 options, etc) and
 return true of false to signify its support.
 
+Crypto offload mode:
 When ready to send, the driver needs to inspect the Tx packet for the
 offload information, including the opaque context, and set up the packet
 send accordingly::
@@ -139,13 +171,25 @@  the stack in xfrm_input().
 In ESN mode, xdo_dev_state_advance_esn() is called from xfrm_replay_advance_esn().
 Driver will check packet seq number and update HW ESN state machine if needed.
 
+Full offload mode:
+HW adds and deletes XFRM headers. So in RX path, XFRM stack is bypassed if HW
+reported success. In TX path, the packet lefts kernel without extra header
+and not encrypted, the HW is responsible to perform it.
+
 When the SA is removed by the user, the driver's xdo_dev_state_delete()
-is asked to disable the offload.  Later, xdo_dev_state_free() is called
-from a garbage collection routine after all reference counts to the state
+and xdo_dev_policy_delete() are asked to disable the offload.  Later,
+xdo_dev_state_free() and xdo_dev_policy_free() are called from a garbage
+collection routine after all reference counts to the state and policy
 have been removed and any remaining resources can be cleared for the
 offload state.  How these are used by the driver will depend on specific
 hardware needs.
 
 As a netdev is set to DOWN the XFRM stack's netdev listener will call
-xdo_dev_state_delete() and xdo_dev_state_free() on any remaining offloaded
-states.
+xdo_dev_state_delete(), xdo_dev_policy_delete(), xdo_dev_state_free() and
+xdo_dev_policy_free() on any remaining offloaded states.
+
+Outcome of HW handling packets, the XFRM core can't count hard, soft limits.
+The HW/driver are responsible to perform it and provide accurate data when
+xdo_dev_state_update_curlft() is called. In case of one of these limits
+occuried, the driver needs to call to xfrm_state_check_expire() to make sure
+that XFRM performs rekeying sequence.