diff mbox series

[net-next] net: phy: improve phy_read_poll_timeout

Message ID 6d8274ac-4344-23b4-d9a3-cad4c39517d4@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 0194b64578e905dc8f112e641a71c306bd58ddde
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [net-next] net: phy: improve phy_read_poll_timeout | expand

Commit Message

Heiner Kallweit March 6, 2023, 9:51 p.m. UTC
cond sometimes is (val & MASK) what may result in a false positive
if val is a negative errno. We shouldn't evaluate cond if val < 0.
This has no functional impact here, but it's not nice.
Therefore switch order of the checks.

Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/phy.h | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Simon Horman March 7, 2023, 3:42 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 10:51:35PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> cond sometimes is (val & MASK) what may result in a false positive
> if val is a negative errno. We shouldn't evaluate cond if val < 0.
> This has no functional impact here, but it's not nice.
> Therefore switch order of the checks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Andrew Lunn March 8, 2023, 1:56 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 10:51:35PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> cond sometimes is (val & MASK) what may result in a false positive
> if val is a negative errno. We shouldn't evaluate cond if val < 0.
> This has no functional impact here, but it's not nice.
> Therefore switch order of the checks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>

    Andrew
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org March 8, 2023, 2:30 a.m. UTC | #3
Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 22:51:35 +0100 you wrote:
> cond sometimes is (val & MASK) what may result in a false positive
> if val is a negative errno. We shouldn't evaluate cond if val < 0.
> This has no functional impact here, but it's not nice.
> Therefore switch order of the checks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] net: phy: improve phy_read_poll_timeout
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/0194b64578e9

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/phy.h b/include/linux/phy.h
index 36bf0bbc8..fefd5091b 100644
--- a/include/linux/phy.h
+++ b/include/linux/phy.h
@@ -1130,16 +1130,15 @@  static inline int phy_read(struct phy_device *phydev, u32 regnum)
 #define phy_read_poll_timeout(phydev, regnum, val, cond, sleep_us, \
 				timeout_us, sleep_before_read) \
 ({ \
-	int __ret = read_poll_timeout(phy_read, val, (cond) || val < 0, \
+	int __ret = read_poll_timeout(phy_read, val, val < 0 || (cond), \
 		sleep_us, timeout_us, sleep_before_read, phydev, regnum); \
-	if (val <  0) \
+	if (val < 0) \
 		__ret = val; \
 	if (__ret) \
 		phydev_err(phydev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, __ret); \
 	__ret; \
 })
 
-
 /**
  * __phy_read - convenience function for reading a given PHY register
  * @phydev: the phy_device struct