diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v1,2/3] bpf: btf: Ensure natural alignment of .BTF_ids section

Message ID 714d7ab8a48172c67ddc027c85b2a0dad0312a74.1726806756.git.tony.ambardar@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Improve .BTF_ids patching and alignment | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 226 this patch: 226
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 13 of 13 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 291 this patch: 291
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 6867 this patch: 6867
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: unnecessary whitespace before a quoted newline
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 fail Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 fail Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 fail Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17

Commit Message

Tony Ambardar Sept. 20, 2024, 7:49 a.m. UTC
While building of vmlinux employs a linker script to align the .BTF_ids
section to 4 bytes, other usage leaves .BTF_ids unaligned and may lead to
problems (e.g. [1]). Post-processing and libelf-based endian translation by
resolve_btfids may also potentially suffer from misalignment.

Update encoding macros in btf_ids.h to always align BTF ID data to 4 bytes.

[1]: 3effc06a4dde ("selftests/bpf: Fix alignment of .BTF_ids")

Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/btf_ids.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Eduard Zingerman Sept. 21, 2024, 9:46 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 2024-09-20 at 00:49 -0700, Tony Ambardar wrote:
> While building of vmlinux employs a linker script to align the .BTF_ids
> section to 4 bytes, other usage leaves .BTF_ids unaligned and may lead to
> problems (e.g. [1]). Post-processing and libelf-based endian translation by
> resolve_btfids may also potentially suffer from misalignment.
> 
> Update encoding macros in btf_ids.h to always align BTF ID data to 4 bytes.
> 
> [1]: 3effc06a4dde ("selftests/bpf: Fix alignment of .BTF_ids")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/btf_ids.h | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/btf_ids.h b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> index c0e3e1426a82..c10b163dc340 100644
> --- a/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> +++ b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ word							\
>  #define __BTF_ID_LIST(name, scope)			\
>  asm(							\
>  ".pushsection " BTF_IDS_SECTION ",\"a\";       \n"	\
> +".balign 4, 0;                                 \n"	\
>  "." #scope " " #name ";                        \n"	\
>  #name ":;                                      \n"	\
>  ".popsection;                                  \n");

This forces all id list symbols to be aligned on 4 bytes.
Should the same be done for __BTF_SET_START?

Also, is it guaranteed that all btf ids are organized in lists and sets?
Grepping through the code it seems they are, but it looks like resolve_btfids
does not really enforce this, simply looking for symbols matching a special name
__BTF_ID__<type>__<symbol>[__<id>] .
Jiri Olsa Sept. 23, 2024, 10:54 a.m. UTC | #2
On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 02:46:17AM -0700, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-09-20 at 00:49 -0700, Tony Ambardar wrote:
> > While building of vmlinux employs a linker script to align the .BTF_ids
> > section to 4 bytes, other usage leaves .BTF_ids unaligned and may lead to
> > problems (e.g. [1]). Post-processing and libelf-based endian translation by
> > resolve_btfids may also potentially suffer from misalignment.
> > 
> > Update encoding macros in btf_ids.h to always align BTF ID data to 4 bytes.
> > 
> > [1]: 3effc06a4dde ("selftests/bpf: Fix alignment of .BTF_ids")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/btf_ids.h | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/btf_ids.h b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> > index c0e3e1426a82..c10b163dc340 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> > @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ word							\
> >  #define __BTF_ID_LIST(name, scope)			\
> >  asm(							\
> >  ".pushsection " BTF_IDS_SECTION ",\"a\";       \n"	\
> > +".balign 4, 0;                                 \n"	\
> >  "." #scope " " #name ";                        \n"	\
> >  #name ":;                                      \n"	\
> >  ".popsection;                                  \n");
> 
> This forces all id list symbols to be aligned on 4 bytes.
> Should the same be done for __BTF_SET_START?

it seems all the set macros use __BTF_ID_LIST, so it should be taken
care of by that

> 
> Also, is it guaranteed that all btf ids are organized in lists and sets?
> Grepping through the code it seems they are, but it looks like resolve_btfids
> does not really enforce this, simply looking for symbols matching a special name
> __BTF_ID__<type>__<symbol>[__<id>] .

yes, you need the BTF_ID to be part of list or set to be able to access it

resolve_btfids does not enforce some loose BTF_ID definition without list/set,
but that does not seem to be a problem

thanks,
jirka
Eduard Zingerman Sept. 23, 2024, 11:39 a.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, 2024-09-23 at 12:54 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:

[...]

> > > diff --git a/include/linux/btf_ids.h b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> > > index c0e3e1426a82..c10b163dc340 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> > > @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ word							\
> > >  #define __BTF_ID_LIST(name, scope)			\
> > >  asm(							\
> > >  ".pushsection " BTF_IDS_SECTION ",\"a\";       \n"	\
> > > +".balign 4, 0;                                 \n"	\
> > >  "." #scope " " #name ";                        \n"	\
> > >  #name ":;                                      \n"	\
> > >  ".popsection;                                  \n");
> > 
> > This forces all id list symbols to be aligned on 4 bytes.
> > Should the same be done for __BTF_SET_START?
> 
> it seems all the set macros use __BTF_ID_LIST, so it should be taken
> care of by that

Apologies, I don't know how I missed __BTF_ID_LIST invocation in
the __BTF_SET_START definition :(

> > Also, is it guaranteed that all btf ids are organized in lists and sets?
> > Grepping through the code it seems they are, but it looks like resolve_btfids
> > does not really enforce this, simply looking for symbols matching a special name
> > __BTF_ID__<type>__<symbol>[__<id>] .
> 
> yes, you need the BTF_ID to be part of list or set to be able to access it
> 
> resolve_btfids does not enforce some loose BTF_ID definition without list/set,
> but that does not seem to be a problem

Understood, thank you.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/btf_ids.h b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
index c0e3e1426a82..c10b163dc340 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf_ids.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@  word							\
 #define __BTF_ID_LIST(name, scope)			\
 asm(							\
 ".pushsection " BTF_IDS_SECTION ",\"a\";       \n"	\
+".balign 4, 0;                                 \n"	\
 "." #scope " " #name ";                        \n"	\
 #name ":;                                      \n"	\
 ".popsection;                                  \n");