diff mbox series

[net-next,10/11] net: mctp: tests: Test that outgoing skbs have flow data populated

Message ID 73b3194049ea75649cc22c17f7d11fa6f9487894.1708071380.git.jk@codeconstruct.com.au (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series MCTP core protocol updates, minor fixes & tests | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 6 of 6 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 148 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/contest success net-next-2024-02-16--21-00 (tests: 1448)

Commit Message

Jeremy Kerr Feb. 16, 2024, 8:19 a.m. UTC
When CONFIG_MCTP_FLOWS is enabled, outgoing skbs should have their
SKB_EXT_MCTP extension set for drivers to consume.

Add two tests for local-to-output routing that check for the flow
extensions: one for the simple single-packet case, and one for
fragmentation.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>
---
 net/mctp/test/route-test.c | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 136 insertions(+)

Comments

Jakub Kicinski Feb. 16, 2024, 2:23 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:19:20 +0800 Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> +static void mctp_test_packet_flow(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	kunit_skip(test, "Requires CONFIG_MCTP_FLOWS=y");
> +}
> +
> +static void mctp_test_fragment_flow(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	kunit_skip(test, "Requires CONFIG_MCTP_FLOWS=y");
> +}

These two get skipped when running:

./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --alltests

Is it possible to make all-test include the right config option
automatically, so they can run?
Jeremy Kerr Feb. 17, 2024, 3:32 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Jakub,

> > +static void mctp_test_packet_flow(struct kunit *test)
> > +{
> > +       kunit_skip(test, "Requires CONFIG_MCTP_FLOWS=y");
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void mctp_test_fragment_flow(struct kunit *test)
> > +{
> > +       kunit_skip(test, "Requires CONFIG_MCTP_FLOWS=y");
> > +}
> 
> These two get skipped when running:
> 
> ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --alltests
> 
> Is it possible to make all-test include the right config option
> automatically, so they can run?

Sure! I assume that's just a matter of adding to all_tests.config, and
getting the dependencies sorted. I will send an update shortly.

Would you prefer a v2 of the series, or just that one patch?

Cheers,


Jeremy
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/mctp/test/route-test.c b/net/mctp/test/route-test.c
index bad084525f17..eb7e9ac95612 100644
--- a/net/mctp/test/route-test.c
+++ b/net/mctp/test/route-test.c
@@ -837,6 +837,140 @@  static void mctp_test_route_input_multiple_nets_key(struct kunit *test)
 	mctp_test_route_input_multiple_nets_key_fini(test, &t2);
 }
 
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MCTP_FLOWS)
+
+static void mctp_test_flow_init(struct kunit *test,
+				struct mctp_test_dev **devp,
+				struct mctp_test_route **rtp,
+				struct socket **sock,
+				struct sk_buff **skbp,
+				unsigned int len)
+{
+	struct mctp_test_route *rt;
+	struct mctp_test_dev *dev;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+	/* we have a slightly odd routing setup here; the test route
+	 * is for EID 8, which is our local EID. We don't do a routing
+	 * lookup, so that's fine - all we require is a path through
+	 * mctp_local_output, which will call rt->output on whatever
+	 * route we provide
+	 */
+	__mctp_route_test_init(test, &dev, &rt, sock, MCTP_NET_ANY);
+
+	/* Assign a single EID. ->addrs is freed on mctp netdev release */
+	dev->mdev->addrs = kmalloc(sizeof(u8), GFP_KERNEL);
+	dev->mdev->num_addrs = 1;
+	dev->mdev->addrs[0] = 8;
+
+	skb = alloc_skb(len + sizeof(struct mctp_hdr) + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, skb);
+	__mctp_cb(skb);
+	skb_reserve(skb, sizeof(struct mctp_hdr) + 1);
+	memset(skb_put(skb, len), 0, len);
+
+	/* take a ref for the route, we'll decrement in local output */
+	refcount_inc(&rt->rt.refs);
+
+	*devp = dev;
+	*rtp = rt;
+	*skbp = skb;
+}
+
+static void mctp_test_flow_fini(struct kunit *test,
+				struct mctp_test_dev *dev,
+				struct mctp_test_route *rt,
+				struct socket *sock)
+{
+	__mctp_route_test_fini(test, dev, rt, sock);
+}
+
+/* test that an outgoing skb has the correct MCTP extension data set */
+static void mctp_test_packet_flow(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb, *skb2;
+	struct mctp_test_route *rt;
+	struct mctp_test_dev *dev;
+	struct mctp_flow *flow;
+	struct socket *sock;
+	u8 dst = 8;
+	int n, rc;
+
+	mctp_test_flow_init(test, &dev, &rt, &sock, &skb, 30);
+
+	rc = mctp_local_output(sock->sk, &rt->rt, skb, dst, MCTP_TAG_OWNER);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, rc, 0);
+
+	n = rt->pkts.qlen;
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, n, 1);
+
+	skb2 = skb_dequeue(&rt->pkts);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, skb2);
+
+	flow = skb_ext_find(skb2, SKB_EXT_MCTP);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, flow);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, flow->key);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, flow->key->sk, sock->sk);
+
+	kfree_skb(skb2);
+	mctp_test_flow_fini(test, dev, rt, sock);
+}
+
+/* test that outgoing skbs, after fragmentation, all have the correct MCTP
+ * extension data set.
+ */
+static void mctp_test_fragment_flow(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct mctp_flow *flows[2];
+	struct sk_buff *tx_skbs[2];
+	struct mctp_test_route *rt;
+	struct mctp_test_dev *dev;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	struct socket *sock;
+	u8 dst = 8;
+	int n, rc;
+
+	mctp_test_flow_init(test, &dev, &rt, &sock, &skb, 100);
+
+	rc = mctp_local_output(sock->sk, &rt->rt, skb, dst, MCTP_TAG_OWNER);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, rc, 0);
+
+	n = rt->pkts.qlen;
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, n, 2);
+
+	/* both resulting packets should have the same flow data */
+	tx_skbs[0] = skb_dequeue(&rt->pkts);
+	tx_skbs[1] = skb_dequeue(&rt->pkts);
+
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, tx_skbs[0]);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, tx_skbs[1]);
+
+	flows[0] = skb_ext_find(tx_skbs[0], SKB_EXT_MCTP);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, flows[0]);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, flows[0]->key);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, flows[0]->key->sk, sock->sk);
+
+	flows[1] = skb_ext_find(tx_skbs[1], SKB_EXT_MCTP);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, flows[1]);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, flows[1]->key, flows[0]->key);
+
+	kfree_skb(tx_skbs[0]);
+	kfree_skb(tx_skbs[1]);
+	mctp_test_flow_fini(test, dev, rt, sock);
+}
+
+#else
+static void mctp_test_packet_flow(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	kunit_skip(test, "Requires CONFIG_MCTP_FLOWS=y");
+}
+
+static void mctp_test_fragment_flow(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	kunit_skip(test, "Requires CONFIG_MCTP_FLOWS=y");
+}
+#endif
+
 static struct kunit_case mctp_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(mctp_test_fragment, mctp_frag_gen_params),
 	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(mctp_test_rx_input, mctp_rx_input_gen_params),
@@ -847,6 +981,8 @@  static struct kunit_case mctp_test_cases[] = {
 			 mctp_route_input_sk_keys_gen_params),
 	KUNIT_CASE(mctp_test_route_input_multiple_nets_bind),
 	KUNIT_CASE(mctp_test_route_input_multiple_nets_key),
+	KUNIT_CASE(mctp_test_packet_flow),
+	KUNIT_CASE(mctp_test_fragment_flow),
 	{}
 };