diff mbox series

[net,v2,1/2] ax25: change kfree in ax25_dev_free to ax25_dev_free

Message ID 81bc171fb2246201236c341e9b7d799f509d7dd4.1714690906.git.duoming@zju.edu.cn (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series ax25: fix reference counting issue of ax25_dev | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag present in non-next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 926 this patch: 926
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 7 of 7 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 937 this patch: 937
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 937 this patch: 937
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 8 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/contest success net-next-2024-05-03--15-00 (tests: 1001)

Commit Message

Duoming Zhou May 2, 2024, 11:36 p.m. UTC
The ax25_dev is managed by reference counting, so it should not be
deallocated directly by kfree() in ax25_dev_free(), replace it with
ax25_dev_put() instead.

Fixes: d01ffb9eee4a ("ax25: add refcount in ax25_dev to avoid UAF bugs")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
---
 net/ax25/ax25_dev.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Markus Elfring May 3, 2024, 5:36 a.m. UTC | #1
> The ax25_dev is managed by reference counting, so it should not be
> deallocated directly by kfree() in ax25_dev_free(), replace it with
> ax25_dev_put() instead.

You repeated a wording mistake in the summary phrase from a previous cover letter.
Please avoid confusion about desired code replacements.
How do you think about to append parentheses to involved function names?


Would you find the following change description a bit nicer?

   The object “ax25_dev” is managed by reference counting.
   Thus it should not be directly released by a kfree() call in ax25_dev_free().
   Replace it with a ax25_dev_put() call instead.


Would you like to extend patch version descriptions (or changelogs) accordingly?

Regards,
Markus
Dan Carpenter May 3, 2024, 11:33 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 07:36:54AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > The ax25_dev is managed by reference counting, so it should not be
> > deallocated directly by kfree() in ax25_dev_free(), replace it with
> > ax25_dev_put() instead.
> 
> You repeated a wording mistake in the summary phrase from a previous cover letter.

Yeah.  That's true.  The subject should be changed to:

Subject: [PATCH] ax25: change kfree() in ax25_dev_free() to ax25_dev_put()

Another option would be:

Subject: [PATCH] ax25: use ax25_dev_put() in ax25_dev_free()

Otherwise the commit message is okay as-is.

regards,
dan carpenter
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c b/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c
index 282ec581c07..07723095c60 100644
--- a/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c
+++ b/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@  void __exit ax25_dev_free(void)
 		s        = ax25_dev;
 		netdev_put(ax25_dev->dev, &ax25_dev->dev_tracker);
 		ax25_dev = ax25_dev->next;
-		kfree(s);
+		ax25_dev_put(s);
 	}
 	ax25_dev_list = NULL;
 	spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_dev_lock);