From patchwork Fri Jan 28 04:47:15 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Duoming Zhou X-Patchwork-Id: 12727929 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E10CC433FE for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 04:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346133AbiA1Ezu (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2022 23:55:50 -0500 Received: from mail.zju.edu.cn ([61.164.42.155]:40516 "EHLO zju.edu.cn" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346148AbiA1EzU (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2022 23:55:20 -0500 Received: from ubuntu.localdomain (unknown [10.15.192.164]) by mail-app2 (Coremail) with SMTP id by_KCgBHTIRXdfNhomB5AQ--.44160S3; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 12:47:25 +0800 (CST) From: Duoming Zhou To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org Cc: jreuter@yaina.de, ralf@linux-mips.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Duoming Zhou Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ax25: improve the incomplete fix to avoid UAF and NPD bugs Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 12:47:15 +0800 Message-Id: <87e509950a15e85274f902f29311f6234ee9f59f.1643343397.git.duoming@zju.edu.cn> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: X-CM-TRANSID: by_KCgBHTIRXdfNhomB5AQ--.44160S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7AF1kZr18CF4kCFyktFy8Grg_yoW5JryrpF WUGF4FgFZrGF4Y9rsxGa97XF10vF4UK398Gr15Zan3u3s8JF95XFyktrWjq34YyrZ5JF18 ZasrK34fXw4jva7anT9S1TB71UUUUUDqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUka1xkIjI8I6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AE w4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2 IY67AKxVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2 z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcV Aq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1Y 6r17McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64 vIr41lF7I21c0EjII2zVCS5cI20VAGYxC7MxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxAIw28IcVCjz48v 1sIEY20_GFWkJr1UJwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r 18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jw0_GFylIxkGc2Ij64vI r41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUCVW8JwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr 1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE x4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x0JUp6wZUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: qssqjiasttq6lmxovvfxof0/ Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org The previous commit 1ade48d0c27d ("ax25: NPD bug when detaching AX25 device") introduce lock_sock() into ax25_kill_by_device to prevent NPD bug. But the concurrency NPD or UAF bug will occur, when lock_sock() or release_sock() dereferences the ax25_cb->sock. The NULL pointer dereference bug can be shown as below: ax25_kill_by_device() | ax25_release() | ax25_destroy_socket() | ax25_cb_del() ... | ... | ax25->sk=NULL; lock_sock(s->sk); //(1) | s->ax25_dev = NULL; | ... release_sock(s->sk); //(2) | ... | The root cause is that the sock is set to null before dereference site (1) or (2). Therefore, this patch extracts the ax25_cb->sock in advance, and uses ax25_list_lock to protect it, which can synchronize with ax25_cb_del() and ensure the value of sock is not null before dereference sites. The concurrency UAF bug can be shown as below: ax25_kill_by_device() | ax25_release() | ax25_destroy_socket() ... | ... | sock_put(sk); //FREE lock_sock(s->sk); //(1) | s->ax25_dev = NULL; | ... release_sock(s->sk); //(2) | ... | The root cause is that the sock is released before dereference site (1) or (2). Therefore, this patch uses sock_hold() to increase the refcount of sock and uses ax25_list_lock to protect it, which can synchronize with ax25_cb_del() in ax25_destroy_socket() and ensure the sock wil not be released before dereference sites. Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou --- net/ax25/af_ax25.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c index 02f43f3e2c5..44a8730c26a 100644 --- a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c +++ b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static void ax25_kill_by_device(struct net_device *dev) { ax25_dev *ax25_dev; ax25_cb *s; + struct sock *sk; if ((ax25_dev = ax25_dev_ax25dev(dev)) == NULL) return; @@ -85,13 +86,15 @@ static void ax25_kill_by_device(struct net_device *dev) again: ax25_for_each(s, &ax25_list) { if (s->ax25_dev == ax25_dev) { + sk = s->sk; + sock_hold(sk); spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock); - lock_sock(s->sk); + lock_sock(sk); s->ax25_dev = NULL; - release_sock(s->sk); + release_sock(sk); ax25_disconnect(s, ENETUNREACH); spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock); - + sock_put(sk); /* The entry could have been deleted from the * list meanwhile and thus the next pointer is * no longer valid. Play it safe and restart