diff mbox series

[bpf] bpf: skip non existing key in generic_map_lookup_batch

Message ID Z6OYbS4WqQnmzi2z@debian.debian (mailing list archive)
State New
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf] bpf: skip non existing key in generic_map_lookup_batch | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-kernel / x86_64-gcc veristat_kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-32 fail Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-meta / x86_64-gcc veristat_meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-46 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-45 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-kernel
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag present in non-next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 26 (+1) this patch: 26 (+1)
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 18 of 18 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 4 this patch: 4
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 83 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 84 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 85 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-11 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-12 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-17 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-20 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-18 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-19 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-21 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-43 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-44 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-47 pending Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-48 pending Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-50 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-49 pending Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-51 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-7 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-10 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release

Commit Message

Yan Zhai Feb. 5, 2025, 4:57 p.m. UTC
The generic_map_lookup_batch currently returns EINTR if it fails with
ENOENT and retries several times on bpf_map_copy_value. The next batch
would start from the same location, presuming it's a transient issue.
This is incorrect if a map can actually have "holes", i.e.
"get_next_key" can return a key that does not point to a valid value. At
least the array of maps type may contain such holes legitly. Right now
these holes show up, generic batch lookup cannot proceed any more. It
will always fail with EINTR errors.

Rather, do not retry in generic_map_lookup_batch. If it finds a non
existing element, skip to the next key.

Fixes: cb4d03ab499d ("bpf: Add generic support for lookup batch op")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Z6JXtA1M5jAZx8xD@debian.debian/
Signed-off-by: Yan Zhai <yan@cloudflare.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c                          | 16 ++----
 .../bpf/map_tests/map_in_map_batch_ops.c      | 54 ++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index c420edbfb7c8..5691fc0d370d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1979,7 +1979,7 @@  int generic_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
 	void __user *values = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.values);
 	void __user *keys = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.keys);
 	void *buf, *buf_prevkey, *prev_key, *key, *value;
-	int err, retry = MAP_LOOKUP_RETRIES;
+	int err;
 	u32 value_size, cp, max_count;
 
 	if (attr->batch.elem_flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK)
@@ -2026,14 +2026,8 @@  int generic_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
 		err = bpf_map_copy_value(map, key, value,
 					 attr->batch.elem_flags);
 
-		if (err == -ENOENT) {
-			if (retry) {
-				retry--;
-				continue;
-			}
-			err = -EINTR;
-			break;
-		}
+		if (err == -ENOENT)
+			goto next_key;
 
 		if (err)
 			goto free_buf;
@@ -2048,12 +2042,12 @@  int generic_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
 			goto free_buf;
 		}
 
+		cp++;
+next_key:
 		if (!prev_key)
 			prev_key = buf_prevkey;
 
 		swap(prev_key, key);
-		retry = MAP_LOOKUP_RETRIES;
-		cp++;
 		cond_resched();
 	}
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/map_in_map_batch_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/map_in_map_batch_ops.c
index 66191ae9863c..b38be71f06be 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/map_in_map_batch_ops.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/map_in_map_batch_ops.c
@@ -120,11 +120,12 @@  static void validate_fetch_results(int outer_map_fd,
 
 static void fetch_and_validate(int outer_map_fd,
 			       struct bpf_map_batch_opts *opts,
-			       __u32 batch_size, bool delete_entries)
+			       __u32 batch_size, bool delete_entries,
+			       bool has_holes)
 {
+	int err, max_entries = OUTER_MAP_ENTRIES - !!has_holes;
 	__u32 *fetched_keys, *fetched_values, total_fetched = 0;
 	__u32 batch_key = 0, fetch_count, step_size;
-	int err, max_entries = OUTER_MAP_ENTRIES;
 	__u32 value_size = sizeof(__u32);
 
 	/* Total entries needs to be fetched */
@@ -135,9 +136,9 @@  static void fetch_and_validate(int outer_map_fd,
 	      "error=%s\n", strerror(errno));
 
 	for (step_size = batch_size;
-	     step_size <= max_entries;
+	     step_size < max_entries + batch_size; /* allow read partial */
 	     step_size += batch_size) {
-		fetch_count = step_size;
+		fetch_count = batch_size;
 		err = delete_entries
 		      ? bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(outer_map_fd,
 				      total_fetched ? &batch_key : NULL,
@@ -184,18 +185,19 @@  static void fetch_and_validate(int outer_map_fd,
 }
 
 static void _map_in_map_batch_ops(enum bpf_map_type outer_map_type,
-				  enum bpf_map_type inner_map_type)
+				  enum bpf_map_type inner_map_type,
+				  bool has_holes)
 {
+	__u32 max_entries = OUTER_MAP_ENTRIES - !!has_holes;
 	__u32 *outer_map_keys, *inner_map_fds;
-	__u32 max_entries = OUTER_MAP_ENTRIES;
 	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_batch_opts, opts);
 	__u32 value_size = sizeof(__u32);
 	int batch_size[2] = {5, 10};
 	__u32 map_index, op_index;
 	int outer_map_fd, ret;
 
-	outer_map_keys = calloc(max_entries, value_size);
-	inner_map_fds = calloc(max_entries, value_size);
+	outer_map_keys = calloc(OUTER_MAP_ENTRIES, value_size);
+	inner_map_fds = calloc(OUTER_MAP_ENTRIES, value_size);
 	CHECK((!outer_map_keys || !inner_map_fds),
 	      "Memory allocation failed for outer_map_keys or inner_map_fds",
 	      "error=%s\n", strerror(errno));
@@ -209,6 +211,24 @@  static void _map_in_map_batch_ops(enum bpf_map_type outer_map_type,
 			((outer_map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS)
 			 ? 9 : 1000) - map_index;
 
+	/* This condition is only meaningful for array of maps.
+	 *
+	 * max_entries == OUTER_MAP_ENTRIES - 1 if it is true. Say
+	 * max_entries is short for n, then outer_map_keys looks like:
+	 *
+	 *   [n, n-1, ... 2, 1]
+	 *
+	 * We change it to
+	 *
+	 *   [n, n-1, ... 2, 0]
+	 *
+	 * So it will leave key 1 as a hole. It will serve to test the
+	 * correctness when batch on an array: a "non-exist" key might be
+	 * actually allocated and returned from key iteration.
+	 */
+	if (has_holes)
+		outer_map_keys[max_entries - 1]--;
+
 	/* batch operation - map_update */
 	ret = bpf_map_update_batch(outer_map_fd, outer_map_keys,
 				   inner_map_fds, &max_entries, &opts);
@@ -219,12 +239,14 @@  static void _map_in_map_batch_ops(enum bpf_map_type outer_map_type,
 	/* batch operation - map_lookup */
 	for (op_index = 0; op_index < 2; ++op_index)
 		fetch_and_validate(outer_map_fd, &opts,
-				   batch_size[op_index], false);
+				   batch_size[op_index], false,
+				   has_holes);
 
 	/* batch operation - map_lookup_delete */
 	if (outer_map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS)
 		fetch_and_validate(outer_map_fd, &opts,
-				   max_entries, true /*delete*/);
+				   max_entries, true /*delete*/,
+				   has_holes);
 
 	/* close all map fds */
 	for (map_index = 0; map_index < max_entries; map_index++)
@@ -237,16 +259,20 @@  static void _map_in_map_batch_ops(enum bpf_map_type outer_map_type,
 
 void test_map_in_map_batch_ops_array(void)
 {
-	_map_in_map_batch_ops(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+	_map_in_map_batch_ops(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, false);
 	printf("%s:PASS with inner ARRAY map\n", __func__);
-	_map_in_map_batch_ops(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+	_map_in_map_batch_ops(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, false);
 	printf("%s:PASS with inner HASH map\n", __func__);
+	_map_in_map_batch_ops(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, true);
+	printf("%s:PASS with inner ARRAY map with holes\n", __func__);
+	_map_in_map_batch_ops(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, true);
+	printf("%s:PASS with inner HASH map with holes\n", __func__);
 }
 
 void test_map_in_map_batch_ops_hash(void)
 {
-	_map_in_map_batch_ops(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+	_map_in_map_batch_ops(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, false);
 	printf("%s:PASS with inner ARRAY map\n", __func__);
-	_map_in_map_batch_ops(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+	_map_in_map_batch_ops(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, false);
 	printf("%s:PASS with inner HASH map\n", __func__);
 }