diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v6,4/5] bpf: selftests: Move xfrm tunnel test to test_progs

Message ID a350db9e08520c64544562d88ec005a039124d9b.1702593901.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit e7adc8291a9e9c232d600d82465cbbb682164ca3
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Add bpf_xdp_get_xfrm_state() kfunc | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/ynl success SINGLE THREAD; Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 2 maintainers not CCed: liuhangbin@gmail.com cehrig@cloudflare.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success net selftest script(s) already in Makefile
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: Possible repeated word: 'Antony' WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst WARNING: line length of 81 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 83 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 84 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 85 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: quoted string split across lines
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail merge-conflict
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat

Commit Message

Daniel Xu Dec. 14, 2023, 10:49 p.m. UTC 
test_progs is better than a shell script b/c C is a bit easier to
maintain than shell. Also it's easier to use new infra like memory
mapped global variables from C via bpf skeleton.

Co-developed-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tunnel.c    | 143 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c    |  11 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tunnel.sh    |  92 -----------
 3 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tunnel.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tunnel.c
index b57d48219d0b..2d7f8fa82ebd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tunnel.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tunnel.c
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ 
  */
 
 #include <arpa/inet.h>
+#include <linux/if_link.h>
 #include <linux/if_tun.h>
 #include <linux/limits.h>
 #include <linux/sysctl.h>
@@ -92,6 +93,11 @@ 
 #define IPIP_TUNL_DEV0 "ipip00"
 #define IPIP_TUNL_DEV1 "ipip11"
 
+#define XFRM_AUTH "0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111"
+#define XFRM_ENC "0x22222222222222222222222222222222"
+#define XFRM_SPI_IN_TO_OUT 0x1
+#define XFRM_SPI_OUT_TO_IN 0x2
+
 #define PING_ARGS "-i 0.01 -c 3 -w 10 -q"
 
 static int config_device(void)
@@ -264,6 +270,92 @@  static void delete_ipip_tunnel(void)
 	SYS_NOFAIL("ip fou del port 5555 2> /dev/null");
 }
 
+static int add_xfrm_tunnel(void)
+{
+	/* at_ns0 namespace
+	 * at_ns0 -> root
+	 */
+	SYS(fail,
+	    "ip netns exec at_ns0 "
+		"ip xfrm state add src %s dst %s proto esp "
+			"spi %d reqid 1 mode tunnel "
+			"auth-trunc 'hmac(sha1)' %s 96 enc 'cbc(aes)' %s",
+	    IP4_ADDR_VETH0, IP4_ADDR1_VETH1, XFRM_SPI_IN_TO_OUT, XFRM_AUTH, XFRM_ENC);
+	SYS(fail,
+	    "ip netns exec at_ns0 "
+		"ip xfrm policy add src %s/32 dst %s/32 dir out "
+			"tmpl src %s dst %s proto esp reqid 1 "
+			"mode tunnel",
+	    IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV0, IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV1, IP4_ADDR_VETH0, IP4_ADDR1_VETH1);
+
+	/* root -> at_ns0 */
+	SYS(fail,
+	    "ip netns exec at_ns0 "
+		"ip xfrm state add src %s dst %s proto esp "
+			"spi %d reqid 2 mode tunnel "
+			"auth-trunc 'hmac(sha1)' %s 96 enc 'cbc(aes)' %s",
+	    IP4_ADDR1_VETH1, IP4_ADDR_VETH0, XFRM_SPI_OUT_TO_IN, XFRM_AUTH, XFRM_ENC);
+	SYS(fail,
+	    "ip netns exec at_ns0 "
+		"ip xfrm policy add src %s/32 dst %s/32 dir in "
+			"tmpl src %s dst %s proto esp reqid 2 "
+			"mode tunnel",
+	    IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV1, IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV0, IP4_ADDR1_VETH1, IP4_ADDR_VETH0);
+
+	/* address & route */
+	SYS(fail, "ip netns exec at_ns0 ip addr add dev veth0 %s/32",
+	    IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV0);
+	SYS(fail, "ip netns exec at_ns0 ip route add %s dev veth0 via %s src %s",
+	    IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV1, IP4_ADDR1_VETH1, IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV0);
+
+	/* root namespace
+	 * at_ns0 -> root
+	 */
+	SYS(fail,
+	    "ip xfrm state add src %s dst %s proto esp "
+		    "spi %d reqid 1 mode tunnel "
+		    "auth-trunc 'hmac(sha1)' %s 96  enc 'cbc(aes)' %s",
+	    IP4_ADDR_VETH0, IP4_ADDR1_VETH1, XFRM_SPI_IN_TO_OUT, XFRM_AUTH, XFRM_ENC);
+	SYS(fail,
+	    "ip xfrm policy add src %s/32 dst %s/32 dir in "
+		    "tmpl src %s dst %s proto esp reqid 1 "
+		    "mode tunnel",
+	    IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV0, IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV1, IP4_ADDR_VETH0, IP4_ADDR1_VETH1);
+
+	/* root -> at_ns0 */
+	SYS(fail,
+	    "ip xfrm state add src %s dst %s proto esp "
+		    "spi %d reqid 2 mode tunnel "
+		    "auth-trunc 'hmac(sha1)' %s 96  enc 'cbc(aes)' %s",
+	    IP4_ADDR1_VETH1, IP4_ADDR_VETH0, XFRM_SPI_OUT_TO_IN, XFRM_AUTH, XFRM_ENC);
+	SYS(fail,
+	    "ip xfrm policy add src %s/32 dst %s/32 dir out "
+		    "tmpl src %s dst %s proto esp reqid 2 "
+		    "mode tunnel",
+	    IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV1, IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV0, IP4_ADDR1_VETH1, IP4_ADDR_VETH0);
+
+	/* address & route */
+	SYS(fail, "ip addr add dev veth1 %s/32", IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV1);
+	SYS(fail, "ip route add %s dev veth1 via %s src %s",
+	    IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV0, IP4_ADDR_VETH0, IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV1);
+
+	return 0;
+fail:
+	return -1;
+}
+
+static void delete_xfrm_tunnel(void)
+{
+	SYS_NOFAIL("ip xfrm policy delete dir out src %s/32 dst %s/32 2> /dev/null",
+		   IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV1, IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV0);
+	SYS_NOFAIL("ip xfrm policy delete dir in src %s/32 dst %s/32 2> /dev/null",
+		   IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV0, IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV1);
+	SYS_NOFAIL("ip xfrm state delete src %s dst %s proto esp spi %d 2> /dev/null",
+		   IP4_ADDR_VETH0, IP4_ADDR1_VETH1, XFRM_SPI_IN_TO_OUT);
+	SYS_NOFAIL("ip xfrm state delete src %s dst %s proto esp spi %d 2> /dev/null",
+		   IP4_ADDR1_VETH1, IP4_ADDR_VETH0, XFRM_SPI_OUT_TO_IN);
+}
+
 static int test_ping(int family, const char *addr)
 {
 	SYS(fail, "%s %s %s > /dev/null", ping_command(family), PING_ARGS, addr);
@@ -532,6 +624,56 @@  static void test_ipip_tunnel(enum ipip_encap encap)
 		test_tunnel_kern__destroy(skel);
 }
 
+static void test_xfrm_tunnel(void)
+{
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_hook, tc_hook,
+			    .attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS);
+	struct test_tunnel_kern *skel = NULL;
+	struct nstoken *nstoken;
+	int tc_prog_fd;
+	int ifindex;
+	int err;
+
+	err = add_xfrm_tunnel();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "add_xfrm_tunnel"))
+		return;
+
+	skel = test_tunnel_kern__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_tunnel_kern__open_and_load"))
+		goto done;
+
+	ifindex = if_nametoindex("veth1");
+	if (!ASSERT_NEQ(ifindex, 0, "veth1 ifindex"))
+		goto done;
+
+	/* attach tc prog to tunnel dev */
+	tc_hook.ifindex = ifindex;
+	tc_prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.xfrm_get_state);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(tc_prog_fd, 0, "bpf_program__fd"))
+		goto done;
+	if (attach_tc_prog(&tc_hook, tc_prog_fd, -1))
+		goto done;
+
+	/* ping from at_ns0 namespace test */
+	nstoken = open_netns("at_ns0");
+	err = test_ping(AF_INET, IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV1);
+	close_netns(nstoken);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_ping"))
+		goto done;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->xfrm_reqid, 1, "req_id"))
+		goto done;
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->xfrm_spi, XFRM_SPI_IN_TO_OUT, "spi"))
+		goto done;
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->xfrm_remote_ip, 0xac100164, "remote_ip"))
+		goto done;
+
+done:
+	delete_xfrm_tunnel();
+	if (skel)
+		test_tunnel_kern__destroy(skel);
+}
+
 #define RUN_TEST(name, ...)						\
 	({								\
 		if (test__start_subtest(#name)) {			\
@@ -548,6 +690,7 @@  static void *test_tunnel_run_tests(void *arg)
 	RUN_TEST(ipip_tunnel, NONE);
 	RUN_TEST(ipip_tunnel, FOU);
 	RUN_TEST(ipip_tunnel, GUE);
+	RUN_TEST(xfrm_tunnel);
 
 	return NULL;
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c
index b320fb7bb080..3a59eb9c34de 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c
@@ -929,6 +929,10 @@  int ip6ip6_get_tunnel(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 	return TC_ACT_OK;
 }
 
+volatile int xfrm_reqid = 0;
+volatile int xfrm_spi = 0;
+volatile int xfrm_remote_ip = 0;
+
 SEC("tc")
 int xfrm_get_state(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 {
@@ -939,9 +943,10 @@  int xfrm_get_state(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return TC_ACT_OK;
 
-	bpf_printk("reqid %d spi 0x%x remote ip 0x%x\n",
-		   x.reqid, bpf_ntohl(x.spi),
-		   bpf_ntohl(x.remote_ipv4));
+	xfrm_reqid = x.reqid;
+	xfrm_spi = bpf_ntohl(x.spi);
+	xfrm_remote_ip = bpf_ntohl(x.remote_ipv4);
+
 	return TC_ACT_OK;
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tunnel.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tunnel.sh
index 2dec7dbf29a2..d9661b9988ba 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tunnel.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tunnel.sh
@@ -517,90 +517,6 @@  test_ip6ip6()
         echo -e ${GREEN}"PASS: ip6$TYPE"${NC}
 }
 
-setup_xfrm_tunnel()
-{
-	auth=0x$(printf '1%.0s' {1..40})
-	enc=0x$(printf '2%.0s' {1..32})
-	spi_in_to_out=0x1
-	spi_out_to_in=0x2
-	# at_ns0 namespace
-	# at_ns0 -> root
-	ip netns exec at_ns0 \
-		ip xfrm state add src 172.16.1.100 dst 172.16.1.200 proto esp \
-			spi $spi_in_to_out reqid 1 mode tunnel \
-			auth-trunc 'hmac(sha1)' $auth 96 enc 'cbc(aes)' $enc
-	ip netns exec at_ns0 \
-		ip xfrm policy add src 10.1.1.100/32 dst 10.1.1.200/32 dir out \
-		tmpl src 172.16.1.100 dst 172.16.1.200 proto esp reqid 1 \
-		mode tunnel
-	# root -> at_ns0
-	ip netns exec at_ns0 \
-		ip xfrm state add src 172.16.1.200 dst 172.16.1.100 proto esp \
-			spi $spi_out_to_in reqid 2 mode tunnel \
-			auth-trunc 'hmac(sha1)' $auth 96 enc 'cbc(aes)' $enc
-	ip netns exec at_ns0 \
-		ip xfrm policy add src 10.1.1.200/32 dst 10.1.1.100/32 dir in \
-		tmpl src 172.16.1.200 dst 172.16.1.100 proto esp reqid 2 \
-		mode tunnel
-	# address & route
-	ip netns exec at_ns0 \
-		ip addr add dev veth0 10.1.1.100/32
-	ip netns exec at_ns0 \
-		ip route add 10.1.1.200 dev veth0 via 172.16.1.200 \
-			src 10.1.1.100
-
-	# root namespace
-	# at_ns0 -> root
-	ip xfrm state add src 172.16.1.100 dst 172.16.1.200 proto esp \
-		spi $spi_in_to_out reqid 1 mode tunnel \
-		auth-trunc 'hmac(sha1)' $auth 96  enc 'cbc(aes)' $enc
-	ip xfrm policy add src 10.1.1.100/32 dst 10.1.1.200/32 dir in \
-		tmpl src 172.16.1.100 dst 172.16.1.200 proto esp reqid 1 \
-		mode tunnel
-	# root -> at_ns0
-	ip xfrm state add src 172.16.1.200 dst 172.16.1.100 proto esp \
-		spi $spi_out_to_in reqid 2 mode tunnel \
-		auth-trunc 'hmac(sha1)' $auth 96  enc 'cbc(aes)' $enc
-	ip xfrm policy add src 10.1.1.200/32 dst 10.1.1.100/32 dir out \
-		tmpl src 172.16.1.200 dst 172.16.1.100 proto esp reqid 2 \
-		mode tunnel
-	# address & route
-	ip addr add dev veth1 10.1.1.200/32
-	ip route add 10.1.1.100 dev veth1 via 172.16.1.100 src 10.1.1.200
-}
-
-test_xfrm_tunnel()
-{
-	if [[ -e /sys/kernel/tracing/trace ]]; then
-		TRACE=/sys/kernel/tracing/trace
-	else
-		TRACE=/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
-	fi
-	config_device
-	> ${TRACE}
-	setup_xfrm_tunnel
-	mkdir -p ${BPF_PIN_TUNNEL_DIR}
-	bpftool prog loadall ${BPF_FILE} ${BPF_PIN_TUNNEL_DIR}
-	tc qdisc add dev veth1 clsact
-	tc filter add dev veth1 proto ip ingress bpf da object-pinned \
-		${BPF_PIN_TUNNEL_DIR}/xfrm_get_state
-	ip netns exec at_ns0 ping $PING_ARG 10.1.1.200
-	sleep 1
-	grep "reqid 1" ${TRACE}
-	check_err $?
-	grep "spi 0x1" ${TRACE}
-	check_err $?
-	grep "remote ip 0xac100164" ${TRACE}
-	check_err $?
-	cleanup
-
-	if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then
-		echo -e ${RED}"FAIL: xfrm tunnel"${NC}
-		return 1
-	fi
-	echo -e ${GREEN}"PASS: xfrm tunnel"${NC}
-}
-
 attach_bpf()
 {
 	DEV=$1
@@ -630,10 +546,6 @@  cleanup()
 	ip link del ip6geneve11 2> /dev/null
 	ip link del erspan11 2> /dev/null
 	ip link del ip6erspan11 2> /dev/null
-	ip xfrm policy delete dir out src 10.1.1.200/32 dst 10.1.1.100/32 2> /dev/null
-	ip xfrm policy delete dir in src 10.1.1.100/32 dst 10.1.1.200/32 2> /dev/null
-	ip xfrm state delete src 172.16.1.100 dst 172.16.1.200 proto esp spi 0x1 2> /dev/null
-	ip xfrm state delete src 172.16.1.200 dst 172.16.1.100 proto esp spi 0x2 2> /dev/null
 }
 
 cleanup_exit()
@@ -716,10 +628,6 @@  bpf_tunnel_test()
 	test_ip6ip6
 	errors=$(( $errors + $? ))
 
-	echo "Testing IPSec tunnel..."
-	test_xfrm_tunnel
-	errors=$(( $errors + $? ))
-
 	return $errors
 }