From patchwork Fri Jun 24 01:05:45 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Duoming Zhou X-Patchwork-Id: 12893281 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35083C43334 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 01:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230257AbiFXBGQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2022 21:06:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51986 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229694AbiFXBGP (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2022 21:06:15 -0400 Received: from zju.edu.cn (mail.zju.edu.cn [61.164.42.155]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82B25DF0F; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 18:06:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ubuntu.localdomain (unknown [10.190.64.135]) by mail-app2 (Coremail) with SMTP id by_KCgCHjorsDbViLh+JAg--.57370S4; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:06:05 +0800 (CST) From: Duoming Zhou To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Duoming Zhou Subject: [PATCH net v3 2/2] net: rose: fix null-ptr-deref caused by rose_kill_by_neigh Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:05:45 +0800 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: X-CM-TRANSID: by_KCgCHjorsDbViLh+JAg--.57370S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxJw1fGr1kXFyrXw4fAFWfGrg_yoW5uF43pr 9xKrW3Grs7Jw4DWF4DJF1Uur40vF1q9F9rJrW09F92y3Z8GrWjvrykKFWUWr15XFsrGFya gF1UW34SyrnFyw7anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUk21xkIjI8I6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AE w4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2 IY67AKxVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2 jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52 x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWU GwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI4 8JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErcIFxwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCF04k20xvE74AGY7Cv 6cx26r4fKr1UJr1l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGw C20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1q6r43MIIYrxkI7VAKI48J MIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6F4UMI IF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E 87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjfUoOJ5UUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: qssqjiasttq6lmxovvfxof0/1tbiAg4KAVZdtaXsswA3s0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org When the link layer connection is broken, the rose->neighbour is set to null. But rose->neighbour could be used by rose_connection() and rose_release() later, because there is no synchronization among them. As a result, the null-ptr-deref bugs will happen. One of the null-ptr-deref bugs is shown below: (thread 1) | (thread 2) | rose_connect rose_kill_by_neigh | lock_sock(sk) spin_lock_bh(&rose_list_lock) | if (!rose->neighbour) rose->neighbour = NULL;//(1) | | rose->neighbour->use++;//(2) The rose->neighbour is set to null in position (1) and dereferenced in position (2). The KASAN report triggered by POC is shown below: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000028-0x000000000000002f] ... RIP: 0010:rose_connect+0x6c2/0xf30 RSP: 0018:ffff88800ab47d60 EFLAGS: 00000206 RAX: 0000000000000005 RBX: 000000000000002a RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff88800ab38000 RSI: ffff88800ab47e48 RDI: ffff88800ab38309 RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffed1001567062 R10: dfffe91001567063 R11: 1ffff11001567061 R12: 1ffff11000d17cd0 R13: ffff8880068be680 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 1ffff11000d17cd0 ... Call Trace: ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x54/0x80 ? selinux_netlbl_socket_connect+0x26/0x30 ? rose_bind+0x5b0/0x5b0 __sys_connect+0x216/0x280 __x64_sys_connect+0x71/0x80 do_syscall_64+0x43/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 This patch adds lock_sock() in rose_kill_by_neigh() in order to synchronize with rose_connect() and rose_release(). Meanwhile, this patch adds sock_hold() protected by rose_list_lock that could synchronize with rose_remove_socket() in order to mitigate UAF bug caused by lock_sock() we add. What's more, there is no need using rose_neigh_list_lock to protect rose_kill_by_neigh(). Because we have already used rose_neigh_list_lock to protect the state change of rose_neigh in rose_link_failed(), which is well synchronized. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou --- Changes since v2: - v2: Fix refcount leak of sock. net/rose/af_rose.c | 6 ++++++ net/rose/rose_route.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/rose/af_rose.c b/net/rose/af_rose.c index bf2d986a6bc..5caa222c490 100644 --- a/net/rose/af_rose.c +++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c @@ -169,9 +169,15 @@ void rose_kill_by_neigh(struct rose_neigh *neigh) struct rose_sock *rose = rose_sk(s); if (rose->neighbour == neigh) { + sock_hold(s); rose_disconnect(s, ENETUNREACH, ROSE_OUT_OF_ORDER, 0); rose->neighbour->use--; + spin_unlock_bh(&rose_list_lock); + lock_sock(s); rose->neighbour = NULL; + release_sock(s); + spin_lock_bh(&rose_list_lock); + sock_put(s); } } spin_unlock_bh(&rose_list_lock); diff --git a/net/rose/rose_route.c b/net/rose/rose_route.c index fee6409c2bb..b116828b422 100644 --- a/net/rose/rose_route.c +++ b/net/rose/rose_route.c @@ -827,7 +827,9 @@ void rose_link_failed(ax25_cb *ax25, int reason) ax25_cb_put(ax25); rose_del_route_by_neigh(rose_neigh); + spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock); rose_kill_by_neigh(rose_neigh); + return; } spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock); }