@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <linux/stddef.h>
#include <linux/bpfptr.h>
#include <linux/btf.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate_trace.h>
struct bpf_verifier_env;
struct bpf_verifier_log;
@@ -1372,6 +1373,8 @@ extern struct bpf_empty_prog_array bpf_empty_prog_array;
struct bpf_prog_array *bpf_prog_array_alloc(u32 prog_cnt, gfp_t flags);
void bpf_prog_array_free(struct bpf_prog_array *progs);
+/* Use when traversal over the bpf_prog_array uses tasks_trace rcu */
+void bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable(struct bpf_prog_array *progs);
int bpf_prog_array_length(struct bpf_prog_array *progs);
bool bpf_prog_array_is_empty(struct bpf_prog_array *array);
int bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user(struct bpf_prog_array *progs,
@@ -1463,6 +1466,55 @@ bpf_prog_run_array(const struct bpf_prog_array *array,
return ret;
}
+/* Notes on RCU design for bpf_prog_arrays containing sleepable programs:
+ *
+ * We use the tasks_trace rcu flavor read section to protect the bpf_prog_array
+ * overall. As a result, we must use the bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable
+ * in order to use the tasks_trace rcu grace period.
+ *
+ * When a non-sleepable program is inside the array, we take the rcu read
+ * section and disable preemption for that program alone, so it can access
+ * rcu-protected dynamically sized maps.
+ */
+static __always_inline u32
+bpf_prog_run_array_sleepable(const struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *array_rcu,
+ const void *ctx, bpf_prog_run_fn run_prog)
+{
+ const struct bpf_prog_array_item *item;
+ const struct bpf_prog *prog;
+ const struct bpf_prog_array *array;
+ struct bpf_run_ctx *old_run_ctx;
+ struct bpf_trace_run_ctx run_ctx;
+ u32 ret = 1;
+
+ might_fault();
+
+ rcu_read_lock_trace();
+ migrate_disable();
+
+ array = rcu_dereference_check(array_rcu, rcu_read_lock_trace_held());
+ if (unlikely(!array))
+ goto out;
+ old_run_ctx = bpf_set_run_ctx(&run_ctx.run_ctx);
+ item = &array->items[0];
+ while ((prog = READ_ONCE(item->prog))) {
+ if (!prog->aux->sleepable)
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+ run_ctx.bpf_cookie = item->bpf_cookie;
+ ret &= run_prog(prog, ctx);
+ item++;
+
+ if (!prog->aux->sleepable)
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ }
+ bpf_reset_run_ctx(old_run_ctx);
+out:
+ migrate_enable();
+ rcu_read_unlock_trace();
+ return ret;
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_prog_active);
extern struct mutex bpf_stats_enabled_mutex;
@@ -2279,6 +2279,21 @@ void bpf_prog_array_free(struct bpf_prog_array *progs)
kfree_rcu(progs, rcu);
}
+static void __bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable_cb(struct rcu_head *rcu)
+{
+ struct bpf_prog_array *progs;
+
+ progs = container_of(rcu, struct bpf_prog_array, rcu);
+ kfree_rcu(progs, rcu);
+}
+
+void bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable(struct bpf_prog_array *progs)
+{
+ if (!progs || progs == &bpf_empty_prog_array.hdr)
+ return;
+ call_rcu_tasks_trace(&progs->rcu, __bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable_cb);
+}
+
int bpf_prog_array_length(struct bpf_prog_array *array)
{
struct bpf_prog_array_item *item;
@@ -1936,7 +1936,7 @@ int perf_event_attach_bpf_prog(struct perf_event *event,
event->prog = prog;
event->bpf_cookie = bpf_cookie;
rcu_assign_pointer(event->tp_event->prog_array, new_array);
- bpf_prog_array_free(old_array);
+ bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable(old_array);
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&bpf_event_mutex);
@@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@ void perf_event_detach_bpf_prog(struct perf_event *event)
bpf_prog_array_delete_safe(old_array, event->prog);
} else {
rcu_assign_pointer(event->tp_event->prog_array, new_array);
- bpf_prog_array_free(old_array);
+ bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable(old_array);
}
bpf_prog_put(event->prog);
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/namei.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/rculist.h>
+#include <linux/filter.h>
#include "trace_dynevent.h"
#include "trace_probe.h"
@@ -1346,9 +1347,7 @@ static void __uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
if (bpf_prog_array_valid(call)) {
u32 ret;
- preempt_disable();
- ret = trace_call_bpf(call, regs);
- preempt_enable();
+ ret = bpf_prog_run_array_sleepable(call->prog_array, regs, bpf_prog_run);
if (!ret)
return;
}
uprobes work by raising a trap, setting a task flag from within the interrupt handler, and processing the actual work for the uprobe on the way back to userspace. As a result, uprobe handlers already execute in a might_fault/_sleep context. The primary obstacle to sleepable bpf uprobe programs is therefore on the bpf side. Namely, the bpf_prog_array attached to the uprobe is protected by normal rcu. In order for uprobe bpf programs to become sleepable, it has to be protected by the tasks_trace rcu flavor instead (and kfree() called after a corresponding grace period). Therefore, the free path for bpf_prog_array now chains a tasks_trace and normal grace periods one after the other. Users who iterate under tasks_trace read section would be safe, as would users who iterate under normal read sections (from non-sleepable locations). The downside is that the tasks_trace latency affects all perf_event-attached bpf programs (and not just uprobe ones). This is deemed safe given the possible attach rates for kprobe/uprobe/tp programs. Separately, non-sleepable programs need access to dynamically sized rcu-protected maps, so bpf_run_prog_array_sleepables now conditionally takes an rcu read section, in addition to the overarching tasks_trace section. Signed-off-by: Delyan Kratunov <delyank@fb.com> --- include/linux/bpf.h | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/bpf/core.c | 15 +++++++++++ kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 4 +-- kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 5 ++-- 4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)