diff mbox series

[net-next,3/4] ipv4: Reject routes specifying ECN bits in rtm_tos

Message ID e59d6861e3c230c9fd1f24f116de38a73fa27773.1643981839.git.gnault@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit f55fbb6afb8d701e3185e31e73f5ea9503a66744
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series inet: Separate DSCP from ECN bits using new dscp_t type | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 2049 this patch: 2049
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 7 of 7 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 297 this patch: 297
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 2180 this patch: 2180
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 167 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Guillaume Nault Feb. 4, 2022, 1:58 p.m. UTC 
Use the new dscp_t type to replace the fc_tos field of fib_config, to
ensure IPv4 routes aren't influenced by ECN bits when configured with
non-zero rtm_tos.

Before this patch, IPv4 routes specifying an rtm_tos with some of the
ECN bits set were accepted. However they wouldn't work (never match) as
IPv4 normally clears the ECN bits with IPTOS_RT_MASK before doing a FIB
lookup (although a few buggy code paths don't).

After this patch, IPv4 routes specifying an rtm_tos with any ECN bit
set is rejected.

Note: IPv6 routes ignore rtm_tos altogether, any rtm_tos is accepted,
but treated as if it were 0.

Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
---
Shuah, FYI, this is the patch I was refering to in our discussion about
testing invalid tos values:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220202232555.GC15826@pc-4.home/

 include/net/ip_fib.h                     |  3 +-
 net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c                  | 11 +++-
 net/ipv4/fib_trie.c                      |  7 ++-
 tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Shuah Khan Feb. 4, 2022, 6:19 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 2/4/22 6:58 AM, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> Use the new dscp_t type to replace the fc_tos field of fib_config, to
> ensure IPv4 routes aren't influenced by ECN bits when configured with
> non-zero rtm_tos.
> 
> Before this patch, IPv4 routes specifying an rtm_tos with some of the
> ECN bits set were accepted. However they wouldn't work (never match) as
> IPv4 normally clears the ECN bits with IPTOS_RT_MASK before doing a FIB
> lookup (although a few buggy code paths don't).
> 
> After this patch, IPv4 routes specifying an rtm_tos with any ECN bit
> set is rejected.
> 
> Note: IPv6 routes ignore rtm_tos altogether, any rtm_tos is accepted,
> but treated as if it were 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
> ---
> Shuah, FYI, this is the patch I was refering to in our discussion about
> testing invalid tos values:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220202232555.GC15826@pc-4.home/
> 

This give me context. Thank you.

thanks,
-- Shuah
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/net/ip_fib.h b/include/net/ip_fib.h
index c4297704bbcb..6a82bcb8813b 100644
--- a/include/net/ip_fib.h
+++ b/include/net/ip_fib.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 #include <net/fib_notifier.h>
 #include <net/fib_rules.h>
+#include <net/inet_dscp.h>
 #include <net/inetpeer.h>
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <linux/notifier.h>
@@ -24,7 +25,7 @@ 
 
 struct fib_config {
 	u8			fc_dst_len;
-	u8			fc_tos;
+	dscp_t			fc_dscp;
 	u8			fc_protocol;
 	u8			fc_scope;
 	u8			fc_type;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
index 4d61ddd8a0ec..c60e1d1ed2b0 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 
+#include <net/inet_dscp.h>
 #include <net/ip.h>
 #include <net/protocol.h>
 #include <net/route.h>
@@ -735,8 +736,16 @@  static int rtm_to_fib_config(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	memset(cfg, 0, sizeof(*cfg));
 
 	rtm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
+
+	if (!inet_validate_dscp(rtm->rtm_tos)) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
+			       "Invalid dsfield (tos): ECN bits must be 0");
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto errout;
+	}
+	cfg->fc_dscp = inet_dsfield_to_dscp(rtm->rtm_tos);
+
 	cfg->fc_dst_len = rtm->rtm_dst_len;
-	cfg->fc_tos = rtm->rtm_tos;
 	cfg->fc_table = rtm->rtm_table;
 	cfg->fc_protocol = rtm->rtm_protocol;
 	cfg->fc_scope = rtm->rtm_scope;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
index 8060524f4256..d937eeebb812 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/notifier.h>
 #include <net/net_namespace.h>
+#include <net/inet_dscp.h>
 #include <net/ip.h>
 #include <net/protocol.h>
 #include <net/route.h>
@@ -1210,9 +1211,9 @@  int fib_table_insert(struct net *net, struct fib_table *tb,
 	struct fib_info *fi;
 	u8 plen = cfg->fc_dst_len;
 	u8 slen = KEYLENGTH - plen;
-	u8 tos = cfg->fc_tos;
 	u32 key;
 	int err;
+	u8 tos;
 
 	key = ntohl(cfg->fc_dst);
 
@@ -1227,6 +1228,7 @@  int fib_table_insert(struct net *net, struct fib_table *tb,
 		goto err;
 	}
 
+	tos = inet_dscp_to_dsfield(cfg->fc_dscp);
 	l = fib_find_node(t, &tp, key);
 	fa = l ? fib_find_alias(&l->leaf, slen, tos, fi->fib_priority,
 				tb->tb_id, false) : NULL;
@@ -1703,8 +1705,8 @@  int fib_table_delete(struct net *net, struct fib_table *tb,
 	struct key_vector *l, *tp;
 	u8 plen = cfg->fc_dst_len;
 	u8 slen = KEYLENGTH - plen;
-	u8 tos = cfg->fc_tos;
 	u32 key;
+	u8 tos;
 
 	key = ntohl(cfg->fc_dst);
 
@@ -1715,6 +1717,7 @@  int fib_table_delete(struct net *net, struct fib_table *tb,
 	if (!l)
 		return -ESRCH;
 
+	tos = inet_dscp_to_dsfield(cfg->fc_dscp);
 	fa = fib_find_alias(&l->leaf, slen, tos, 0, tb->tb_id, false);
 	if (!fa)
 		return -ESRCH;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh
index 996af1ae3d3d..bb73235976b3 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh
@@ -1447,6 +1447,81 @@  ipv4_local_rt_cache()
 	log_test $? 0 "Cached route removed from VRF port device"
 }
 
+ipv4_rt_dsfield()
+{
+	echo
+	echo "IPv4 route with dsfield tests"
+
+	run_cmd "$IP route flush 172.16.102.0/24"
+
+	# New routes should reject dsfield options that interfere with ECN
+	run_cmd "$IP route add 172.16.102.0/24 dsfield 0x01 via 172.16.101.2"
+	log_test $? 2 "Reject route with dsfield 0x01"
+
+	run_cmd "$IP route add 172.16.102.0/24 dsfield 0x02 via 172.16.101.2"
+	log_test $? 2 "Reject route with dsfield 0x02"
+
+	run_cmd "$IP route add 172.16.102.0/24 dsfield 0x03 via 172.16.101.2"
+	log_test $? 2 "Reject route with dsfield 0x03"
+
+	# A generic route that doesn't take DSCP into account
+	run_cmd "$IP route add 172.16.102.0/24 via 172.16.101.2"
+
+	# A more specific route for DSCP 0x10
+	run_cmd "$IP route add 172.16.102.0/24 dsfield 0x10 via 172.16.103.2"
+
+	# DSCP 0x10 should match the specific route, no matter the ECN bits
+	$IP route get fibmatch 172.16.102.1 dsfield 0x10 | \
+		grep -q "via 172.16.103.2"
+	log_test $? 0 "IPv4 route with DSCP and ECN:Not-ECT"
+
+	$IP route get fibmatch 172.16.102.1 dsfield 0x11 | \
+		grep -q "via 172.16.103.2"
+	log_test $? 0 "IPv4 route with DSCP and ECN:ECT(1)"
+
+	$IP route get fibmatch 172.16.102.1 dsfield 0x12 | \
+		grep -q "via 172.16.103.2"
+	log_test $? 0 "IPv4 route with DSCP and ECN:ECT(0)"
+
+	$IP route get fibmatch 172.16.102.1 dsfield 0x13 | \
+		grep -q "via 172.16.103.2"
+	log_test $? 0 "IPv4 route with DSCP and ECN:CE"
+
+	# Unknown DSCP should match the generic route, no matter the ECN bits
+	$IP route get fibmatch 172.16.102.1 dsfield 0x14 | \
+		grep -q "via 172.16.101.2"
+	log_test $? 0 "IPv4 route with unknown DSCP and ECN:Not-ECT"
+
+	$IP route get fibmatch 172.16.102.1 dsfield 0x15 | \
+		grep -q "via 172.16.101.2"
+	log_test $? 0 "IPv4 route with unknown DSCP and ECN:ECT(1)"
+
+	$IP route get fibmatch 172.16.102.1 dsfield 0x16 | \
+		grep -q "via 172.16.101.2"
+	log_test $? 0 "IPv4 route with unknown DSCP and ECN:ECT(0)"
+
+	$IP route get fibmatch 172.16.102.1 dsfield 0x17 | \
+		grep -q "via 172.16.101.2"
+	log_test $? 0 "IPv4 route with unknown DSCP and ECN:CE"
+
+	# Null DSCP should match the generic route, no matter the ECN bits
+	$IP route get fibmatch 172.16.102.1 dsfield 0x00 | \
+		grep -q "via 172.16.101.2"
+	log_test $? 0 "IPv4 route with no DSCP and ECN:Not-ECT"
+
+	$IP route get fibmatch 172.16.102.1 dsfield 0x01 | \
+		grep -q "via 172.16.101.2"
+	log_test $? 0 "IPv4 route with no DSCP and ECN:ECT(1)"
+
+	$IP route get fibmatch 172.16.102.1 dsfield 0x02 | \
+		grep -q "via 172.16.101.2"
+	log_test $? 0 "IPv4 route with no DSCP and ECN:ECT(0)"
+
+	$IP route get fibmatch 172.16.102.1 dsfield 0x03 | \
+		grep -q "via 172.16.101.2"
+	log_test $? 0 "IPv4 route with no DSCP and ECN:CE"
+}
+
 ipv4_route_test()
 {
 	route_setup
@@ -1454,6 +1529,7 @@  ipv4_route_test()
 	ipv4_rt_add
 	ipv4_rt_replace
 	ipv4_local_rt_cache
+	ipv4_rt_dsfield
 
 	route_cleanup
 }