diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v3] bpftool: Check map name length when map create

Message ID tencent_AF066A426F591F977D2A73AF00A34A883808@qq.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next,v3] bpftool: Check map name length when map create | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / GCC BPF / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-meta / x86_64-gcc veristat_meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-44 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-50 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-51 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat-meta
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-43 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat-kernel / x86_64-gcc veristat_kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat-kernel
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / GCC BPF / GCC BPF
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-45 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-49 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / GCC BPF / GCC BPF
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 26 (+1) this patch: 26 (+1)
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 14 of 14 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-47 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-48 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-46 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Rong Tao Feb. 12, 2025, 1:20 a.m. UTC
From: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>

The size of struct bpf_map::name is BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN (16).

bpf(2) {
  map_create() {
    bpf_obj_name_cpy(map->name, attr->map_name, sizeof(attr->map_name));
  }
}

When specifying a map name using bpftool map create name, no error is
reported if the name length is greater than 15.

    $ sudo bpftool map create /sys/fs/bpf/12345678901234567890 \
        type array key 4 value 4 entries 5 name 12345678901234567890

Users will think that 12345678901234567890 is legal, but this name cannot
be used to index a map.

    $ sudo bpftool map show name 12345678901234567890
    Error: can't parse name

    $ sudo bpftool map show
    ...
    1249: array  name 123456789012345  flags 0x0
    	key 4B  value 4B  max_entries 5  memlock 304B

    $ sudo bpftool map show name 123456789012345
    1249: array  name 123456789012345  flags 0x0
    	key 4B  value 4B  max_entries 5  memlock 304B

The map name provided in the command line is truncated, but no warning is
reported. This submission checks the length of the map name.

Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
---
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/tencent_26592A2BAF08A3A688A50600421559929708@qq.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/tencent_1C4444032C2188ACD04B4995B0D78F510607@qq.com/
---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Comments

Quentin Monnet Feb. 12, 2025, 11:23 a.m. UTC | #1
2025-02-12 09:20 UTC+0800 ~ Rong Tao <rtoax@foxmail.com>
> From: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
> 
> The size of struct bpf_map::name is BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN (16).
> 
> bpf(2) {
>   map_create() {
>     bpf_obj_name_cpy(map->name, attr->map_name, sizeof(attr->map_name));
>   }
> }
> 
> When specifying a map name using bpftool map create name, no error is
> reported if the name length is greater than 15.
> 
>     $ sudo bpftool map create /sys/fs/bpf/12345678901234567890 \
>         type array key 4 value 4 entries 5 name 12345678901234567890
> 
> Users will think that 12345678901234567890 is legal, but this name cannot
> be used to index a map.
> 
>     $ sudo bpftool map show name 12345678901234567890
>     Error: can't parse name
> 
>     $ sudo bpftool map show
>     ...
>     1249: array  name 123456789012345  flags 0x0
>     	key 4B  value 4B  max_entries 5  memlock 304B
> 
>     $ sudo bpftool map show name 123456789012345
>     1249: array  name 123456789012345  flags 0x0
>     	key 4B  value 4B  max_entries 5  memlock 304B
> 
> The map name provided in the command line is truncated, but no warning is
> reported. This submission checks the length of the map name.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
> ---
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/tencent_26592A2BAF08A3A688A50600421559929708@qq.com/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/tencent_1C4444032C2188ACD04B4995B0D78F510607@qq.com/
> ---
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
> index ed4a9bd82931..9617e64d3d11 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
> @@ -1270,6 +1270,10 @@ static int do_create(int argc, char **argv)
>  		} else if (is_prefix(*argv, "name")) {
>  			NEXT_ARG();
>  			map_name = GET_ARG();
> +			if (strlen(map_name) > BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN - 1) {
> +				p_info("Warning: map name is longer than %d characters, it will be truncated.\n",


Change looks mostly good, thanks! Two small things to address with this
message string:

- Please remove the trailing '\n', p_info() adds it already.
- Please replace %d with %u. The value is unsigned, and we've merged a
commit to clean these up recently, 17c3dc50294b ("bpftool: Using the
right format specifiers").


> +				      BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN - 1);
> +			}
>  		} else if (is_prefix(*argv, "key")) {
>  			if (parse_u32_arg(&argc, &argv, &key_size,
>  					  "key size"))
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
index ed4a9bd82931..9617e64d3d11 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
@@ -1270,6 +1270,10 @@  static int do_create(int argc, char **argv)
 		} else if (is_prefix(*argv, "name")) {
 			NEXT_ARG();
 			map_name = GET_ARG();
+			if (strlen(map_name) > BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN - 1) {
+				p_info("Warning: map name is longer than %d characters, it will be truncated.\n",
+				      BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN - 1);
+			}
 		} else if (is_prefix(*argv, "key")) {
 			if (parse_u32_arg(&argc, &argv, &key_size,
 					  "key size"))