@@ -804,11 +804,13 @@ static int ocfs2_inode_is_valid_to_delete(struct inode *inode)
goto bail;
}
- /* If we're coming from downconvert_thread we can't go into our own
- * voting [hello, deadlock city!], so unforuntately we just
- * have to skip deleting this guy. That's OK though because
- * the node who's doing the actual deleting should handle it
- * anyway. */
+ /*
+ * If we're coming from downconvert_thread we can't go into our own
+ * voting [hello, deadlock city!] so we cannot delete the inode. But
+ * since we dropped last inode ref when downconverting dentry lock,
+ * we cannot have the file open and thus the node doing unlink will
+ * take care of deleting the inode.
+ */
if (current == osb->dc_task)
goto bail;
@@ -954,8 +956,6 @@ static void ocfs2_delete_inode(struct inode *inode)
if (is_bad_inode(inode) || !OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_blkno)
goto bail;
- dquot_initialize(inode);
-
if (!ocfs2_inode_is_valid_to_delete(inode)) {
/* It's probably not necessary to truncate_inode_pages
* here but we do it for safety anyway (it will most
@@ -964,6 +964,8 @@ static void ocfs2_delete_inode(struct inode *inode)
goto bail;
}
+ dquot_initialize(inode);
+
/* We want to block signals in delete_inode as the lock and
* messaging paths may return us -ERESTARTSYS. Which would
* cause us to exit early, resulting in inodes being orphaned