diff mbox series

[v2,06/14] jbd2: replace ll_rw_block()

Message ID 20220901133505.2510834-7-yi.zhang@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series fs/buffer: remove ll_rw_block() | expand

Commit Message

Zhang Yi Sept. 1, 2022, 1:34 p.m. UTC
ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot
guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We
could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has
been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in
journal_get_superblock(). We also switch to new bh_readahead_batch()
for the buffer array readahead path.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
---
 fs/jbd2/journal.c  | 15 ++++++---------
 fs/jbd2/recovery.c | 16 ++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Comments

Jan Kara Sept. 1, 2022, 3:50 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu 01-09-22 21:34:57, Zhang Yi wrote:
> ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot
> guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We
> could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has
> been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in
> journal_get_superblock(). We also switch to new bh_readahead_batch()
> for the buffer array readahead path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>

Looks good to me. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/jbd2/journal.c  | 15 ++++++---------
>  fs/jbd2/recovery.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> index 6350d3857c89..140b070471c0 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> @@ -1893,19 +1893,16 @@ static int journal_get_superblock(journal_t *journal)
>  {
>  	struct buffer_head *bh;
>  	journal_superblock_t *sb;
> -	int err = -EIO;
> +	int err;
>  
>  	bh = journal->j_sb_buffer;
>  
>  	J_ASSERT(bh != NULL);
> -	if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
> -		ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh);
> -		wait_on_buffer(bh);
> -		if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
> -			printk(KERN_ERR
> -				"JBD2: IO error reading journal superblock\n");
> -			goto out;
> -		}
> +	err = bh_read(bh, 0);
> +	if (err < 0) {
> +		printk(KERN_ERR
> +			"JBD2: IO error reading journal superblock\n");
> +		goto out;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (buffer_verified(bh))
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/recovery.c b/fs/jbd2/recovery.c
> index f548479615c6..1f878c315b03 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/recovery.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/recovery.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static int do_readahead(journal_t *journal, unsigned int start)
>  		if (!buffer_uptodate(bh) && !buffer_locked(bh)) {
>  			bufs[nbufs++] = bh;
>  			if (nbufs == MAXBUF) {
> -				ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, nbufs, bufs);
> +				bh_readahead_batch(nbufs, bufs, 0);
>  				journal_brelse_array(bufs, nbufs);
>  				nbufs = 0;
>  			}
> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static int do_readahead(journal_t *journal, unsigned int start)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (nbufs)
> -		ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, nbufs, bufs);
> +		bh_readahead_batch(nbufs, bufs, 0);
>  	err = 0;
>  
>  failed:
> @@ -152,9 +152,14 @@ static int jread(struct buffer_head **bhp, journal_t *journal,
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
> -		/* If this is a brand new buffer, start readahead.
> -                   Otherwise, we assume we are already reading it.  */
> -		if (!buffer_req(bh))
> +		/*
> +		 * If this is a brand new buffer, start readahead.
> +		 * Otherwise, we assume we are already reading it.
> +		 */
> +		bool need_readahead = !buffer_req(bh);
> +
> +		bh_read_nowait(bh, 0);
> +		if (need_readahead)
>  			do_readahead(journal, offset);
>  		wait_on_buffer(bh);
>  	}
> @@ -687,7 +692,6 @@ static int do_one_pass(journal_t *journal,
>  					mark_buffer_dirty(nbh);
>  					BUFFER_TRACE(nbh, "marking uptodate");
>  					++info->nr_replays;
> -					/* ll_rw_block(WRITE, 1, &nbh); */
>  					unlock_buffer(nbh);
>  					brelse(obh);
>  					brelse(nbh);
> -- 
> 2.31.1
>
Christoph Hellwig Sept. 5, 2022, 5:54 a.m. UTC | #2
Looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Theodore Ts'o Sept. 5, 2022, 8:23 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 09:34:57PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot
> guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We
> could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has
> been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in
> journal_get_superblock(). We also switch to new bh_readahead_batch()
> for the buffer array readahead path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>

Thanks, looks good.

Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>


					- Ted
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
index 6350d3857c89..140b070471c0 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
@@ -1893,19 +1893,16 @@  static int journal_get_superblock(journal_t *journal)
 {
 	struct buffer_head *bh;
 	journal_superblock_t *sb;
-	int err = -EIO;
+	int err;
 
 	bh = journal->j_sb_buffer;
 
 	J_ASSERT(bh != NULL);
-	if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
-		ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh);
-		wait_on_buffer(bh);
-		if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
-			printk(KERN_ERR
-				"JBD2: IO error reading journal superblock\n");
-			goto out;
-		}
+	err = bh_read(bh, 0);
+	if (err < 0) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR
+			"JBD2: IO error reading journal superblock\n");
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	if (buffer_verified(bh))
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/recovery.c b/fs/jbd2/recovery.c
index f548479615c6..1f878c315b03 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/recovery.c
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@  static int do_readahead(journal_t *journal, unsigned int start)
 		if (!buffer_uptodate(bh) && !buffer_locked(bh)) {
 			bufs[nbufs++] = bh;
 			if (nbufs == MAXBUF) {
-				ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, nbufs, bufs);
+				bh_readahead_batch(nbufs, bufs, 0);
 				journal_brelse_array(bufs, nbufs);
 				nbufs = 0;
 			}
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@  static int do_readahead(journal_t *journal, unsigned int start)
 	}
 
 	if (nbufs)
-		ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, nbufs, bufs);
+		bh_readahead_batch(nbufs, bufs, 0);
 	err = 0;
 
 failed:
@@ -152,9 +152,14 @@  static int jread(struct buffer_head **bhp, journal_t *journal,
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
-		/* If this is a brand new buffer, start readahead.
-                   Otherwise, we assume we are already reading it.  */
-		if (!buffer_req(bh))
+		/*
+		 * If this is a brand new buffer, start readahead.
+		 * Otherwise, we assume we are already reading it.
+		 */
+		bool need_readahead = !buffer_req(bh);
+
+		bh_read_nowait(bh, 0);
+		if (need_readahead)
 			do_readahead(journal, offset);
 		wait_on_buffer(bh);
 	}
@@ -687,7 +692,6 @@  static int do_one_pass(journal_t *journal,
 					mark_buffer_dirty(nbh);
 					BUFFER_TRACE(nbh, "marking uptodate");
 					++info->nr_replays;
-					/* ll_rw_block(WRITE, 1, &nbh); */
 					unlock_buffer(nbh);
 					brelse(obh);
 					brelse(nbh);