Message ID | 523ECBD4.1000403@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Acked-by: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 06:52:04PM +0800, Younger Liu wrote: > If group_bh is not initialized, there is no need to release. > This problem does not cause anything wrong, but the patch > would make the code more logical. > > Signed-off-by: Younger Liu <younger.liu@huawei.com> > --- > fs/ocfs2/resize.c | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/resize.c b/fs/ocfs2/resize.c > index 376750f..822ebc1 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/resize.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/resize.c > @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ int ocfs2_group_add(struct inode *inode, struct ocfs2_new_group_input *input) > ret = ocfs2_verify_group_and_input(main_bm_inode, fe, input, group_bh); > if (ret) { > mlog_errno(ret); > - goto out_unlock; > + goto out_free_group_bh; > } > > trace_ocfs2_group_add((unsigned long long)input->group, > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ int ocfs2_group_add(struct inode *inode, struct ocfs2_new_group_input *input) > if (IS_ERR(handle)) { > mlog_errno(PTR_ERR(handle)); > ret = -EINVAL; > - goto out_unlock; > + goto out_free_group_bh; > } > > cl_bpc = le16_to_cpu(fe->id2.i_chain.cl_bpc); > @@ -577,8 +577,11 @@ int ocfs2_group_add(struct inode *inode, struct ocfs2_new_group_input *input) > > out_commit: > ocfs2_commit_trans(osb, handle); > -out_unlock: > + > +out_free_group_bh: > brelse(group_bh); > + > +out_unlock: > brelse(main_bm_bh); > > ocfs2_inode_unlock(main_bm_inode, 1); > -- > 1.7.9.7 > > > _______________________________________________ > Ocfs2-devel mailing list > Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com > https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/resize.c b/fs/ocfs2/resize.c index 376750f..822ebc1 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/resize.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/resize.c @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ int ocfs2_group_add(struct inode *inode, struct ocfs2_new_group_input *input) ret = ocfs2_verify_group_and_input(main_bm_inode, fe, input, group_bh); if (ret) { mlog_errno(ret); - goto out_unlock; + goto out_free_group_bh; } trace_ocfs2_group_add((unsigned long long)input->group, @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ int ocfs2_group_add(struct inode *inode, struct ocfs2_new_group_input *input) if (IS_ERR(handle)) { mlog_errno(PTR_ERR(handle)); ret = -EINVAL; - goto out_unlock; + goto out_free_group_bh; } cl_bpc = le16_to_cpu(fe->id2.i_chain.cl_bpc); @@ -577,8 +577,11 @@ int ocfs2_group_add(struct inode *inode, struct ocfs2_new_group_input *input) out_commit: ocfs2_commit_trans(osb, handle); -out_unlock: + +out_free_group_bh: brelse(group_bh); + +out_unlock: brelse(main_bm_bh); ocfs2_inode_unlock(main_bm_inode, 1);
If group_bh is not initialized, there is no need to release. This problem does not cause anything wrong, but the patch would make the code more logical. Signed-off-by: Younger Liu <younger.liu@huawei.com> --- fs/ocfs2/resize.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)