diff mbox series

[Kernel,Bug] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request in const_folio_flags

Message ID CALf2hKtnFskBvmZeigK_=mqq9Vd4TWT+YOXcwfNNt1ydOY=0Yg@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [Kernel,Bug] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request in const_folio_flags | expand

Commit Message

Zhiyu Zhang March 22, 2025, 5:52 p.m. UTC
Dear Developers and Maintainers,

We would like to report a Linux kernel bug titled "BUG: unable to
handle kernel paging request in const_folio_flags" found in
Linux-6.14-rc7 by our modified tool. We have reproduced the crash and
applied a patch that can avoid the kernel panic. Here are the relevant
attachments:

kernel config: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vHuHlQyiKlXbyuo03sZTiuaA5jZ5MtV6/view?usp=sharing
report: https://drive.google.com/file/d/11LD1uFid1u3r7brsvd85-SrBzvXwH-w2/view?usp=sharing
syz reproducer:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10v3FtkewHcAnTjsUGqFCDl7k7hiCJ12-/view?usp=sharing
C reproducer: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L9WTVbO2pfqXLjXyQcMy4f-Am3obTJcN/view?usp=sharing
crash log: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zwYU3061pnTSVIEpuZ-EBR7FYvWPxX4z/view?usp=sharing

We speculate this vulnerability arises from a missing check for error
pointers in the array folios[i] within the function
ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(). When the kernel fails to write or
allocate folios for writing (e.g., due to OOM), the wc->w_folios[i]
may be assigned an error pointer (e.g., -ENOMEM) in
fs/ocfs2/aops.c:1075, which is then returned as an error to
ocfs2_write_begin_nolock(). Within ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(),
there is no proper handling for error pointers, so the function
attempts to process folios[i] directly. This results in the kernel
attempting to dereference an invalid pointer during the call chain:
ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios->folio_unlock->folio_test_locked->const_folio_flags.
Specifically, during debugging, we observe that the kernel attempts to
read data from rbx+0x8 (where rbx = 0xfffffffffffffff4), causing a
page fault and kernel panic.

I tested the following patch, which prevents the kernel panic by
checking for error pointers before accessing folios[i]:

                folio_unlock(folios[i]);
                folio_mark_accessed(folios[i]);

However, I am not sure if the analysis and patch are appropriate.
Could you check this issue? With the verification, I would like to
submit a patch.

Wish you a nice day!

Best,
Zhiyu Zhang
diff mbox series

Patch

--- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
@@ -767,7 +767,7 @@  void ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(struct folio
**folios, int num_folios)
        int i;

        for(i = 0; i < num_folios; i++) {
-               if (!folios[i])
+               if (!folios[i] || IS_ERR(folios[i]))    // or use
IS_ERR_OR_NULL instead
                        continue;