diff mbox

platform/x86: intel-hid: Power button suspend on Dell Latitude 7275

Message ID 20170917225712.12136-1-jerome.debretagne@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: Darren Hart
Headers show

Commit Message

Jérôme de Bretagne Sept. 17, 2017, 10:57 p.m. UTC
From: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>

On Dell Latitude 7275 the 5-button array is not exposed in the
ACPI tables, but still notifies are sent to the Intel HID device
object (device ID INT33D5) in response to power button actions.
They were ignored as the intel-hid driver was not prepared to
take care of them until recently.

Power button wakeup from suspend-to-idle was added in:
635173a17b03 ("intel-hid: Wake up Dell Latitude 7275 from
suspend-to-idle"). However power button suspend doesn't work
yet on this platform so it would be good to add it also.

On the affected platform (for which priv->array is NULL), add
a new upfront check against the power button press notification
(0xCE) to notify_handler(), outside the wakeup mode this time,
which allows to report the power button press event and
trigger the suspend. Also catch and ignore the corresponding
power button release notification (0xCF) to stop it from being
reported as an "unknown event" in the logs.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196115
Tested-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

Comments

Limonciello, Mario Sept. 18, 2017, 9:29 p.m. UTC | #1
> -----Original Message-----

> From: Jérôme de Bretagne [mailto:jerome.debretagne@gmail.com]

> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2017 5:57 PM

> To: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org

> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>;

> Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>; Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>;

> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>; Limonciello, Mario

> <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>; Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>

> Subject: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel-hid: Power button suspend on Dell Latitude

> 7275

> 

> From: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>

> 

> On Dell Latitude 7275 the 5-button array is not exposed in the

> ACPI tables, but still notifies are sent to the Intel HID device

> object (device ID INT33D5) in response to power button actions.

> They were ignored as the intel-hid driver was not prepared to

> take care of them until recently.

> 

> Power button wakeup from suspend-to-idle was added in:

> 635173a17b03 ("intel-hid: Wake up Dell Latitude 7275 from

> suspend-to-idle"). However power button suspend doesn't work

> yet on this platform so it would be good to add it also.

> 

> On the affected platform (for which priv->array is NULL), add

> a new upfront check against the power button press notification

> (0xCE) to notify_handler(), outside the wakeup mode this time,

> which allows to report the power button press event and

> trigger the suspend. Also catch and ignore the corresponding

> power button release notification (0xCF) to stop it from being

> reported as an "unknown event" in the logs.

> 

> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196115

> Tested-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>

> Signed-off-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>

> ---

>  drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++

>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

> 

> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c

> index a782c78e7c63..b19f8dcf9d8c 100644

> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c

> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c

> @@ -226,6 +226,22 @@ static void notify_handler(acpi_handle handle, u32 event,

> void *context)

>  		return;

>  	}

> 

> +	/*

> +	 * Needed for suspend to work on some platforms that don't expose

> +	 * the 5-button array, but still send notifies with power button

> +	 * event code to this device object on power button actions.

> +	 *

> +	 * Report the power button press; catch and ignore the button release.

> +	 */

> +	if (!priv->array) {

> +		if (event == 0xce) {

> +			input_report_key(priv->input_dev, KEY_POWER, 1);

> +			input_sync(priv->input_dev);

> +			return;

> +		} else if (event == 0xcf)

> +			return;

> +	}

> +

>  	/* 0xC0 is for HID events, other values are for 5 button array */

>  	if (event != 0xc0) {

>  		if (!priv->array ||


LGTM, it's improved from what you posted to that bug already.

Acked-By: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>
Jérôme de Bretagne Sept. 18, 2017, 10:40 p.m. UTC | #2
2017-09-18 23:29 GMT+02:00  <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com>:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jérôme de Bretagne [mailto:jerome.debretagne@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2017 5:57 PM
>> To: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>;
>> Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>; Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>;
>> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>; Limonciello, Mario
>> <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>; Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel-hid: Power button suspend on Dell Latitude
>> 7275
>>
>> From: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
>>
>> On Dell Latitude 7275 the 5-button array is not exposed in the
>> ACPI tables, but still notifies are sent to the Intel HID device
>> object (device ID INT33D5) in response to power button actions.
>> They were ignored as the intel-hid driver was not prepared to
>> take care of them until recently.
>>
>> Power button wakeup from suspend-to-idle was added in:
>> 635173a17b03 ("intel-hid: Wake up Dell Latitude 7275 from
>> suspend-to-idle"). However power button suspend doesn't work
>> yet on this platform so it would be good to add it also.
>>
>> On the affected platform (for which priv->array is NULL), add
>> a new upfront check against the power button press notification
>> (0xCE) to notify_handler(), outside the wakeup mode this time,
>> which allows to report the power button press event and
>> trigger the suspend. Also catch and ignore the corresponding
>> power button release notification (0xCF) to stop it from being
>> reported as an "unknown event" in the logs.
>>
>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196115
>> Tested-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c
>> index a782c78e7c63..b19f8dcf9d8c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c
>> @@ -226,6 +226,22 @@ static void notify_handler(acpi_handle handle, u32 event,
>> void *context)
>>               return;
>>       }
>>
>> +     /*
>> +      * Needed for suspend to work on some platforms that don't expose
>> +      * the 5-button array, but still send notifies with power button
>> +      * event code to this device object on power button actions.
>> +      *
>> +      * Report the power button press; catch and ignore the button release.
>> +      */
>> +     if (!priv->array) {
>> +             if (event == 0xce) {
>> +                     input_report_key(priv->input_dev, KEY_POWER, 1);
>> +                     input_sync(priv->input_dev);
>> +                     return;
>> +             } else if (event == 0xcf)
>> +                     return;
>> +     }
>> +
>>       /* 0xC0 is for HID events, other values are for 5 button array */
>>       if (event != 0xc0) {
>>               if (!priv->array ||
>
> LGTM, it's improved from what you posted to that bug already.
>
> Acked-By: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>

Thanks Mario.

In fact, I updated my initial fix proposal on the 12th in [1] and
this patch matches exactly the updated version. You didn't receive
the update notification from Bugzilla?

[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196115#c12
Limonciello, Mario Sept. 20, 2017, 8:07 p.m. UTC | #3
> -----Original Message-----

> From: Jérôme de Bretagne [mailto:jerome.debretagne@gmail.com]

> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 5:41 PM

> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>

> Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org; Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>;

> LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-

> acpi@vger.kernel.org>; Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>; Andy Shevchenko

> <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>; Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>

> Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel-hid: Power button suspend on Dell

> Latitude 7275

> 

> 2017-09-18 23:29 GMT+02:00  <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com>:

> >> -----Original Message-----

> >> From: Jérôme de Bretagne [mailto:jerome.debretagne@gmail.com]

> >> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2017 5:57 PM

> >> To: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org

> >> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>;

> >> Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>; Rafael J. Wysocki

> <rjw@rjwysocki.net>;

> >> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>; Limonciello, Mario

> >> <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>; Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>

> >> Subject: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel-hid: Power button suspend on Dell Latitude

> >> 7275

> >>

> >> From: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>

> >>

> >> On Dell Latitude 7275 the 5-button array is not exposed in the

> >> ACPI tables, but still notifies are sent to the Intel HID device

> >> object (device ID INT33D5) in response to power button actions.

> >> They were ignored as the intel-hid driver was not prepared to

> >> take care of them until recently.

> >>

> >> Power button wakeup from suspend-to-idle was added in:

> >> 635173a17b03 ("intel-hid: Wake up Dell Latitude 7275 from

> >> suspend-to-idle"). However power button suspend doesn't work

> >> yet on this platform so it would be good to add it also.

> >>

> >> On the affected platform (for which priv->array is NULL), add

> >> a new upfront check against the power button press notification

> >> (0xCE) to notify_handler(), outside the wakeup mode this time,

> >> which allows to report the power button press event and

> >> trigger the suspend. Also catch and ignore the corresponding

> >> power button release notification (0xCF) to stop it from being

> >> reported as an "unknown event" in the logs.

> >>

> >> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196115

> >> Tested-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>

> >> Signed-off-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>

> >> ---

> >>  drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++

> >>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

> >>

> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c

> >> index a782c78e7c63..b19f8dcf9d8c 100644

> >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c

> >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c

> >> @@ -226,6 +226,22 @@ static void notify_handler(acpi_handle handle, u32

> event,

> >> void *context)

> >>               return;

> >>       }

> >>

> >> +     /*

> >> +      * Needed for suspend to work on some platforms that don't expose

> >> +      * the 5-button array, but still send notifies with power button

> >> +      * event code to this device object on power button actions.

> >> +      *

> >> +      * Report the power button press; catch and ignore the button release.

> >> +      */

> >> +     if (!priv->array) {

> >> +             if (event == 0xce) {

> >> +                     input_report_key(priv->input_dev, KEY_POWER, 1);

> >> +                     input_sync(priv->input_dev);

> >> +                     return;

> >> +             } else if (event == 0xcf)

> >> +                     return;

> >> +     }

> >> +

> >>       /* 0xC0 is for HID events, other values are for 5 button array */

> >>       if (event != 0xc0) {

> >>               if (!priv->array ||

> >

> > LGTM, it's improved from what you posted to that bug already.

> >

> > Acked-By: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>

> 

> Thanks Mario.

> 

> In fact, I updated my initial fix proposal on the 12th in [1] and

> this patch matches exactly the updated version. You didn't receive

> the update notification from Bugzilla?

> 

> [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196115#c12


No I didn't get one (or some enterprise spam filter helpfully avoided
letting it into my inbox).
Darren Hart Sept. 22, 2017, 11:45 p.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:57:12AM +0200, Jérôme de Bretagne wrote:
> From: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
> 
> On Dell Latitude 7275 the 5-button array is not exposed in the
> ACPI tables, but still notifies are sent to the Intel HID device
> object (device ID INT33D5) in response to power button actions.
> They were ignored as the intel-hid driver was not prepared to
> take care of them until recently.
> 
> Power button wakeup from suspend-to-idle was added in:
> 635173a17b03 ("intel-hid: Wake up Dell Latitude 7275 from
> suspend-to-idle"). However power button suspend doesn't work
> yet on this platform so it would be good to add it also.
> 
> On the affected platform (for which priv->array is NULL), add
> a new upfront check against the power button press notification
> (0xCE) to notify_handler(), outside the wakeup mode this time,
> which allows to report the power button press event and
> trigger the suspend. Also catch and ignore the corresponding
> power button release notification (0xCF) to stop it from being
> reported as an "unknown event" in the logs.
> 
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196115
> Tested-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c
> index a782c78e7c63..b19f8dcf9d8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,22 @@ static void notify_handler(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *context)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Needed for suspend to work on some platforms that don't expose
> +	 * the 5-button array, but still send notifies with power button
> +	 * event code to this device object on power button actions.
> +	 *
> +	 * Report the power button press; catch and ignore the button release.
> +	 */
> +	if (!priv->array) {
> +		if (event == 0xce) {
> +			input_report_key(priv->input_dev, KEY_POWER, 1);
> +			input_sync(priv->input_dev);
> +			return;
> +		} else if (event == 0xcf)
> +			return;

Minor CodingStyle nit. If the if block uses parens, so does the else block. In
this case, since the if returns, just skip the else entirely.

See Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
The example immediatley *before* 3.1) Spaces.

I've made this change and queued for testing.

> +	}
> +
>  	/* 0xC0 is for HID events, other values are for 5 button array */
>  	if (event != 0xc0) {
>  		if (!priv->array ||
>
Andy Shevchenko Sept. 25, 2017, 10:57 a.m. UTC | #5
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:57:12AM +0200, Jérôme de Bretagne wrote:

>> +             if (event == 0xce) {
>> +                     input_report_key(priv->input_dev, KEY_POWER, 1);
>> +                     input_sync(priv->input_dev);
>> +                     return;
>> +             } else if (event == 0xcf)
>> +                     return;
>
> Minor CodingStyle nit. If the if block uses parens, so does the else block. In
> this case, since the if returns, just skip the else entirely.
>
> See Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
> The example immediatley *before* 3.1) Spaces.
>
> I've made this change and queued for testing.
>
>> +     }

Actually in this case even 'else' is redundant.
Darren Hart Sept. 27, 2017, 7:31 a.m. UTC | #6
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 01:57:48PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:57:12AM +0200, Jérôme de Bretagne wrote:
> 
> >> +             if (event == 0xce) {
> >> +                     input_report_key(priv->input_dev, KEY_POWER, 1);
> >> +                     input_sync(priv->input_dev);
> >> +                     return;
> >> +             } else if (event == 0xcf)
> >> +                     return;
> >
> > Minor CodingStyle nit. If the if block uses parens, so does the else block. In
> > this case, since the if returns, just skip the else entirely.
> >
> > See Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
> > The example immediatley *before* 3.1) Spaces.
> >
> > I've made this change and queued for testing.
> >
> >> +     }
> 
> Actually in this case even 'else' is redundant.

Yes, this is what I meant above by "skip the else entirely", and is the
change I made prior to committing. I was just pointing out the coding
style at the same time :-)
Andy Shevchenko Sept. 27, 2017, 8:58 a.m. UTC | #7
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 01:57:48PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:57:12AM +0200, Jérôme de Bretagne wrote:
>>
>> >> +             if (event == 0xce) {
>> >> +                     input_report_key(priv->input_dev, KEY_POWER, 1);
>> >> +                     input_sync(priv->input_dev);
>> >> +                     return;
>> >> +             } else if (event == 0xcf)
>> >> +                     return;
>> >
>> > Minor CodingStyle nit. If the if block uses parens, so does the else block. In
>> > this case, since the if returns, just skip the else entirely.
>> >
>> > See Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
>> > The example immediatley *before* 3.1) Spaces.
>> >
>> > I've made this change and queued for testing.
>> >
>> >> +     }
>>
>> Actually in this case even 'else' is redundant.
>
> Yes, this is what I meant above by "skip the else entirely", and is the
> change I made prior to committing. I was just pointing out the coding
> style at the same time :-)

Good we are on the same page WRT such pattern.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c
index a782c78e7c63..b19f8dcf9d8c 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c
@@ -226,6 +226,22 @@  static void notify_handler(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *context)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Needed for suspend to work on some platforms that don't expose
+	 * the 5-button array, but still send notifies with power button
+	 * event code to this device object on power button actions.
+	 *
+	 * Report the power button press; catch and ignore the button release.
+	 */
+	if (!priv->array) {
+		if (event == 0xce) {
+			input_report_key(priv->input_dev, KEY_POWER, 1);
+			input_sync(priv->input_dev);
+			return;
+		} else if (event == 0xcf)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/* 0xC0 is for HID events, other values are for 5 button array */
 	if (event != 0xc0) {
 		if (!priv->array ||