@@ -9633,13 +9633,13 @@ static ssize_t charge_control_end_threshold_store(struct device *dev,
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(charge_control_start_threshold);
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(charge_control_end_threshold);
-struct device_attribute dev_attr_charge_start_threshold = __ATTR(
+static struct device_attribute dev_attr_charge_start_threshold = __ATTR(
charge_start_threshold,
0644,
charge_control_start_threshold_show,
charge_control_start_threshold_store
);
-struct device_attribute dev_attr_charge_stop_threshold = __ATTR(
+static struct device_attribute dev_attr_charge_stop_threshold = __ATTR(
charge_stop_threshold,
0644,
charge_control_end_threshold_show,
The sparse tool complains as follows: drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c:9636:25: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_charge_start_threshold' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c:9642:25: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_charge_stop_threshold' was not declared. Should it be static? Those variables are not used outside of thinkpad_acpi.c, so this commit marks them static. Fixes: e33929537b76 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: use standard charge control attribute names") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> --- drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)